Nada Ibrahim Hendi, Yaser AbuSammour, Mohamed Khaled, Ahmed S Mohamed, Ahmed Mostafa Amin, Mohamed Saleh Fallaha, Basma Kamel, Yehia Nabil Abdalla Helmy, Mohamed Ali Saeed Hassan, Mostafa Meshref
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激对难治性癫痫患者癫痫控制的疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Nada Ibrahim Hendi, Yaser AbuSammour, Mohamed Khaled, Ahmed S Mohamed, Ahmed Mostafa Amin, Mohamed Saleh Fallaha, Basma Kamel, Yehia Nabil Abdalla Helmy, Mohamed Ali Saeed Hassan, Mostafa Meshref","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03657-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug-resistant epilepsy is a challenging condition that affects around 30% of all patients with epilepsy. Evidence regarding treatment options is limited, especially for surgery and invasive techniques. However, non-invasive techniques constitute a promising alternative for these patients. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on seizure frequency management in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. We searched the literature in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to December 2023. We included randomized controlled trials that compared transcranial direct current stimulation with sham stimulation. Our main outcomes of interest were a percentage reduction in seizure frequency and epileptiform discharge frequency. A total of 10 studies with 269 patients were included. Monthly seizure frequency was significantly reduced by an average of -45.39%and -39.34% at week 4 and week 8, respectively. There was a significant reduction in IED in favor of tDCS at week 2 (SMD = -0.87, 95% CI = [- 1.49, - 0.25], P = 0.006), 4 weeks (SMD = -1.17, 95% CI = [- 1.67, - 0.66], P < 0.00001, Moderate quality of evidence) and 8 weeks (SMD = -1.11, 95% CI = [- 1.69, - 0.53], P = 0.0002) of follow-up. There were no serious adverse events associated with the stimulation. Transcranial direct current stimulation was associated with a reduction in both seizure frequency and epileptiform discharges with minimal side effects. Further studies with larger sample sizes and consensus protocol guidelines are needed to verify its long-term safety and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"515"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation on seizure control in patients with refractory epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Nada Ibrahim Hendi, Yaser AbuSammour, Mohamed Khaled, Ahmed S Mohamed, Ahmed Mostafa Amin, Mohamed Saleh Fallaha, Basma Kamel, Yehia Nabil Abdalla Helmy, Mohamed Ali Saeed Hassan, Mostafa Meshref\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03657-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Drug-resistant epilepsy is a challenging condition that affects around 30% of all patients with epilepsy. Evidence regarding treatment options is limited, especially for surgery and invasive techniques. However, non-invasive techniques constitute a promising alternative for these patients. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on seizure frequency management in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. We searched the literature in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to December 2023. We included randomized controlled trials that compared transcranial direct current stimulation with sham stimulation. Our main outcomes of interest were a percentage reduction in seizure frequency and epileptiform discharge frequency. A total of 10 studies with 269 patients were included. Monthly seizure frequency was significantly reduced by an average of -45.39%and -39.34% at week 4 and week 8, respectively. There was a significant reduction in IED in favor of tDCS at week 2 (SMD = -0.87, 95% CI = [- 1.49, - 0.25], P = 0.006), 4 weeks (SMD = -1.17, 95% CI = [- 1.67, - 0.66], P < 0.00001, Moderate quality of evidence) and 8 weeks (SMD = -1.11, 95% CI = [- 1.69, - 0.53], P = 0.0002) of follow-up. There were no serious adverse events associated with the stimulation. Transcranial direct current stimulation was associated with a reduction in both seizure frequency and epileptiform discharges with minimal side effects. Further studies with larger sample sizes and consensus protocol guidelines are needed to verify its long-term safety and effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177013/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03657-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03657-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
耐药癫痫是一种具有挑战性的疾病,约占所有癫痫患者的30%。关于治疗选择的证据有限,特别是手术和侵入性技术。然而,非侵入性技术为这些患者提供了一个有希望的选择。本荟萃分析旨在评估经颅直流电刺激对耐药癫痫患者发作频率管理的有效性。我们在PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science中检索了截至2023年12月的文献。我们纳入了比较经颅直流电刺激和假刺激的随机对照试验。我们感兴趣的主要结果是癫痫发作频率和癫痫样放电频率的百分比降低。共纳入10项研究,269例患者。在第4周和第8周,月癫痫发作频率分别平均降低-45.39%和-39.34%。在第2周(SMD = -0.87, 95% CI = [- 1.49, - 0.25], P = 0.006),第4周(SMD = -1.17, 95% CI = [- 1.67, - 0.66], P
Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation on seizure control in patients with refractory epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Drug-resistant epilepsy is a challenging condition that affects around 30% of all patients with epilepsy. Evidence regarding treatment options is limited, especially for surgery and invasive techniques. However, non-invasive techniques constitute a promising alternative for these patients. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on seizure frequency management in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. We searched the literature in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to December 2023. We included randomized controlled trials that compared transcranial direct current stimulation with sham stimulation. Our main outcomes of interest were a percentage reduction in seizure frequency and epileptiform discharge frequency. A total of 10 studies with 269 patients were included. Monthly seizure frequency was significantly reduced by an average of -45.39%and -39.34% at week 4 and week 8, respectively. There was a significant reduction in IED in favor of tDCS at week 2 (SMD = -0.87, 95% CI = [- 1.49, - 0.25], P = 0.006), 4 weeks (SMD = -1.17, 95% CI = [- 1.67, - 0.66], P < 0.00001, Moderate quality of evidence) and 8 weeks (SMD = -1.11, 95% CI = [- 1.69, - 0.53], P = 0.0002) of follow-up. There were no serious adverse events associated with the stimulation. Transcranial direct current stimulation was associated with a reduction in both seizure frequency and epileptiform discharges with minimal side effects. Further studies with larger sample sizes and consensus protocol guidelines are needed to verify its long-term safety and effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.