内镜超声引导下肛门注射肉毒杆菌毒素治疗小儿便秘的准确性和结果:一项初步研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Brianne Shuler, Alexandra L Kilgore, Paul Tran, Taylor Montminy, Lori Silveira, Jaime Belkind-Gerson, Jacob A Mark
{"title":"内镜超声引导下肛门注射肉毒杆菌毒素治疗小儿便秘的准确性和结果:一项初步研究。","authors":"Brianne Shuler, Alexandra L Kilgore, Paul Tran, Taylor Montminy, Lori Silveira, Jaime Belkind-Gerson, Jacob A Mark","doi":"10.1002/jpn3.70122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Injection of Onabotulinumtoxina (BT) into the internal anal sphincter (IAS) is commonly used for pediatric constipation. Typically, BT injections are guided by anatomic landmarks (standard technique [ST]). This pilot study assessed the accuracy of BT injection placement with ST versus endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance and compared clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children aged 2-18 with chronic functional constipation undergoing BT injections without anorectal anatomic or neurologic abnormalities were eligible. Fifteen children were enrolled in the intervention arm with ST placement and needle location assessment using EUS. Subsequently, EUS-guided injection was specifically placed into the IAS. Additionally, 30 children (controls) received BT by ST without EUS-guidance. A constipation severity questionnaire was administered at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postprocedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial needle tip location was the IAS for 30 placements (50.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.1%-63.5%) and the external anal sphincter in 15 placements (20.3%, 95% CI: 11.8%-32.8%) of a total 59 injections assessed by EUS. Patients reported improvement at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months in both study groups. Constipation scores obtained only after injections were worse in EUS versus control (22.21 vs. 13.83, p < 0.0001) at 2 weeks, with no significant difference at 3 (15.8 vs. 13.57, p = 0.127) or 6 months (13.10 vs. 13.27, p = 0.9322).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows the IAS is injected with BT only 50% of the time with standard technique based on anatomical landmarks.</p>","PeriodicalId":16694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy and outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound guided anal botulinum toxin injections for pediatric constipation: A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Brianne Shuler, Alexandra L Kilgore, Paul Tran, Taylor Montminy, Lori Silveira, Jaime Belkind-Gerson, Jacob A Mark\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jpn3.70122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Injection of Onabotulinumtoxina (BT) into the internal anal sphincter (IAS) is commonly used for pediatric constipation. Typically, BT injections are guided by anatomic landmarks (standard technique [ST]). This pilot study assessed the accuracy of BT injection placement with ST versus endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance and compared clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children aged 2-18 with chronic functional constipation undergoing BT injections without anorectal anatomic or neurologic abnormalities were eligible. Fifteen children were enrolled in the intervention arm with ST placement and needle location assessment using EUS. Subsequently, EUS-guided injection was specifically placed into the IAS. Additionally, 30 children (controls) received BT by ST without EUS-guidance. A constipation severity questionnaire was administered at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postprocedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial needle tip location was the IAS for 30 placements (50.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.1%-63.5%) and the external anal sphincter in 15 placements (20.3%, 95% CI: 11.8%-32.8%) of a total 59 injections assessed by EUS. Patients reported improvement at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months in both study groups. Constipation scores obtained only after injections were worse in EUS versus control (22.21 vs. 13.83, p < 0.0001) at 2 weeks, with no significant difference at 3 (15.8 vs. 13.57, p = 0.127) or 6 months (13.10 vs. 13.27, p = 0.9322).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows the IAS is injected with BT only 50% of the time with standard technique based on anatomical landmarks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.70122\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.70122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:内肛门括约肌注射肉毒杆菌毒素(BT)是治疗小儿便秘的常用方法。通常,BT注射是由解剖标记引导的(标准技术[ST])。这项初步研究评估了ST与内镜超声(EUS)引导下BT注射放置的准确性,并比较了临床结果。方法:年龄2-18岁的慢性功能性便秘儿童接受BT注射,无肛门直肠解剖或神经异常。15名儿童被纳入干预组,使用EUS进行ST放置和针位评估。随后,eus引导注射被专门放置在IAS中。另外,30名儿童(对照组)在没有eus指导的情况下接受ST治疗。术后2周、3个月和6个月进行便秘严重程度问卷调查。结果:在EUS评估的59次注射中,30次初始针尖位置为IAS(50.1%, 95%可信区间[CI]: 38.1%-63.5%), 15次初始针尖位置为肛门外括约肌(20.3%,95% CI: 11.8%-32.8%)。在两个研究组中,患者报告在2周、3个月和6个月时均有改善。与对照组相比,仅注射后获得的便秘评分更差(22.21比13.83,p)。结论:本研究表明,采用基于解剖标志的标准技术,IAS注射BT的时间仅为50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy and outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound guided anal botulinum toxin injections for pediatric constipation: A pilot study.

Objectives: Injection of Onabotulinumtoxina (BT) into the internal anal sphincter (IAS) is commonly used for pediatric constipation. Typically, BT injections are guided by anatomic landmarks (standard technique [ST]). This pilot study assessed the accuracy of BT injection placement with ST versus endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance and compared clinical outcomes.

Methods: Children aged 2-18 with chronic functional constipation undergoing BT injections without anorectal anatomic or neurologic abnormalities were eligible. Fifteen children were enrolled in the intervention arm with ST placement and needle location assessment using EUS. Subsequently, EUS-guided injection was specifically placed into the IAS. Additionally, 30 children (controls) received BT by ST without EUS-guidance. A constipation severity questionnaire was administered at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postprocedure.

Results: The initial needle tip location was the IAS for 30 placements (50.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.1%-63.5%) and the external anal sphincter in 15 placements (20.3%, 95% CI: 11.8%-32.8%) of a total 59 injections assessed by EUS. Patients reported improvement at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months in both study groups. Constipation scores obtained only after injections were worse in EUS versus control (22.21 vs. 13.83, p < 0.0001) at 2 weeks, with no significant difference at 3 (15.8 vs. 13.57, p = 0.127) or 6 months (13.10 vs. 13.27, p = 0.9322).

Conclusions: This study shows the IAS is injected with BT only 50% of the time with standard technique based on anatomical landmarks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
467
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (JPGN) provides a forum for original papers and reviews dealing with pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, including normal and abnormal functions of the alimentary tract and its associated organs, including the salivary glands, pancreas, gallbladder, and liver. Particular emphasis is on development and its relation to infant and childhood nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信