Catello Vollono, Marina Romozzi, Antonio Munafò, Giulia Vigani, Francesco De Cesaris, Paolo Calabresi, Luigi Francesco Iannone
{"title":"曲坦类药物使用对抗cgrp单克隆抗体反应的影响：一项前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Catello Vollono, Marina Romozzi, Antonio Munafò, Giulia Vigani, Francesco De Cesaris, Paolo Calabresi, Luigi Francesco Iannone","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13202-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the differences in clinical characteristics and response to monoclonal antibodies against CGRP (anti-CGRP mAbs) between patients who habitually used triptans (TRIPTANS group) and patients who were non-current users (NO-TRIPTANS group).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, all consecutive outpatients treated with anti-CGRP mAbs for 12 months were included. Clinical data were collected at baseline and monthly: number of headache days (MHDs), the absolute number of analgesics (AMNs), and the number of days with at least one analgesic (AMDs), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaires. The outcomes were to evaluate the differences between TRIPTANS and NO-TRIPTANS groups (users or non-users of triptans in the 6 months before and during anti-CGRP mAb treatment) in MHDs and the other clinical variables during treatment. Response rates were assessed based on reductions in MHDs (≤ 25%, ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 336 patients treated with mAbs were included. At baseline, NO-TRIPTANS group had higher MHDs (24.7 ± 6.7) compared to the TRIPTANS group (21.8 ± 6.9), p < 0.001. Comparative and normalized analyses showed significant and sustained lower MHDs in the TRIPTANS group during treatment. The MIDAS score was also significantly lower in the TRIPTANS group at month-3, 6, 9, 12, and lower AMDs and AMNs compared to NO-TRIPTANS group were seen in most of the time-points. The number of patients with ≥ 50% reduction of MHDs was significantly higher in the TRIPTANS group at months 1 and 12.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed greater effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAb in habitual triptans users, possibly due to a common and/or synergistic action.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 7","pages":"468"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of triptans use on anti-CGRP mAbs response: a prospective, cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Catello Vollono, Marina Romozzi, Antonio Munafò, Giulia Vigani, Francesco De Cesaris, Paolo Calabresi, Luigi Francesco Iannone\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-025-13202-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the differences in clinical characteristics and response to monoclonal antibodies against CGRP (anti-CGRP mAbs) between patients who habitually used triptans (TRIPTANS group) and patients who were non-current users (NO-TRIPTANS group).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, all consecutive outpatients treated with anti-CGRP mAbs for 12 months were included. Clinical data were collected at baseline and monthly: number of headache days (MHDs), the absolute number of analgesics (AMNs), and the number of days with at least one analgesic (AMDs), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaires. The outcomes were to evaluate the differences between TRIPTANS and NO-TRIPTANS groups (users or non-users of triptans in the 6 months before and during anti-CGRP mAb treatment) in MHDs and the other clinical variables during treatment. Response rates were assessed based on reductions in MHDs (≤ 25%, ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 336 patients treated with mAbs were included. At baseline, NO-TRIPTANS group had higher MHDs (24.7 ± 6.7) compared to the TRIPTANS group (21.8 ± 6.9), p < 0.001. Comparative and normalized analyses showed significant and sustained lower MHDs in the TRIPTANS group during treatment. The MIDAS score was also significantly lower in the TRIPTANS group at month-3, 6, 9, 12, and lower AMDs and AMNs compared to NO-TRIPTANS group were seen in most of the time-points. The number of patients with ≥ 50% reduction of MHDs was significantly higher in the TRIPTANS group at months 1 and 12.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed greater effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAb in habitual triptans users, possibly due to a common and/or synergistic action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 7\",\"pages\":\"468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13202-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13202-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of triptans use on anti-CGRP mAbs response: a prospective, cohort study.
Background: This study aimed to compare the differences in clinical characteristics and response to monoclonal antibodies against CGRP (anti-CGRP mAbs) between patients who habitually used triptans (TRIPTANS group) and patients who were non-current users (NO-TRIPTANS group).
Methods: In this prospective cohort study, all consecutive outpatients treated with anti-CGRP mAbs for 12 months were included. Clinical data were collected at baseline and monthly: number of headache days (MHDs), the absolute number of analgesics (AMNs), and the number of days with at least one analgesic (AMDs), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaires. The outcomes were to evaluate the differences between TRIPTANS and NO-TRIPTANS groups (users or non-users of triptans in the 6 months before and during anti-CGRP mAb treatment) in MHDs and the other clinical variables during treatment. Response rates were assessed based on reductions in MHDs (≤ 25%, ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%).
Results: A total of 336 patients treated with mAbs were included. At baseline, NO-TRIPTANS group had higher MHDs (24.7 ± 6.7) compared to the TRIPTANS group (21.8 ± 6.9), p < 0.001. Comparative and normalized analyses showed significant and sustained lower MHDs in the TRIPTANS group during treatment. The MIDAS score was also significantly lower in the TRIPTANS group at month-3, 6, 9, 12, and lower AMDs and AMNs compared to NO-TRIPTANS group were seen in most of the time-points. The number of patients with ≥ 50% reduction of MHDs was significantly higher in the TRIPTANS group at months 1 and 12.
Conclusions: This study showed greater effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAb in habitual triptans users, possibly due to a common and/or synergistic action.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
