{"title":"超声引导椎前筋膜切口加C5根水解剖治疗神经源性胸廓出口综合征的应用研究。","authors":"Zhenlan Liao, Yajing Zhou, Wen Cao","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S524917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of the C5 nerve root, in combination with prevertebral fascia incision, as a treatment for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2023 and January 2024, a total of 34 patients diagnosed with NTOS were enrolled in the treatment group, all of whom underwent ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of the C5 nerve root and prevertebral fascia incision. A control group consisting of 34 healthy participants was also included for comparative purposes. Preoperative and postoperative ultrasound measurements were taken at 1 and 6 weeks, including the thickness of the prevertebral fascia, the distance between the C5 nerve root and fascia, and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the C5 nerve root. Pain intensity and functional status were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative measurements in the NTOS group showed increased prevertebral fascia thickness (median: 0.1 mm [IQR 0.08-0.12]), reduced distance between the C5 nerve root and the fascia (median: 0.13 mm [IQR 0.10-0.16]), and a larger CSA of the C5 nerve root (median: 0.08 mm² [IQR 0.06-0.10]). Post-treatment, VAS scores significantly improved from a median of 7 (IQR 6-8) to 2 (IQR 2-3) at 1 week and remained stable at 6 weeks, while DASH scores improved from 85 (IQR 82-89) to 34 (IQR 31-36) at 1 week and 33 at 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of the C5 nerve root, along with prevertebral fascia incision, is an effective, minimally invasive treatment for NTOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"2973-2982"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-Guided the Prevertebral Fascia Incise and the C5 Root Hydrodissection for the Treatment of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: an Application Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zhenlan Liao, Yajing Zhou, Wen Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S524917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of the C5 nerve root, in combination with prevertebral fascia incision, as a treatment for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2023 and January 2024, a total of 34 patients diagnosed with NTOS were enrolled in the treatment group, all of whom underwent ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of the C5 nerve root and prevertebral fascia incision. A control group consisting of 34 healthy participants was also included for comparative purposes. Preoperative and postoperative ultrasound measurements were taken at 1 and 6 weeks, including the thickness of the prevertebral fascia, the distance between the C5 nerve root and fascia, and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the C5 nerve root. Pain intensity and functional status were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative measurements in the NTOS group showed increased prevertebral fascia thickness (median: 0.1 mm [IQR 0.08-0.12]), reduced distance between the C5 nerve root and the fascia (median: 0.13 mm [IQR 0.10-0.16]), and a larger CSA of the C5 nerve root (median: 0.08 mm² [IQR 0.06-0.10]). Post-treatment, VAS scores significantly improved from a median of 7 (IQR 6-8) to 2 (IQR 2-3) at 1 week and remained stable at 6 weeks, while DASH scores improved from 85 (IQR 82-89) to 34 (IQR 31-36) at 1 week and 33 at 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of the C5 nerve root, along with prevertebral fascia incision, is an effective, minimally invasive treatment for NTOS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2973-2982\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176125/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S524917\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S524917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:回顾性研究超声引导下C5神经根水解剖联合椎前筋膜切开治疗神经源性胸廓出口综合征(NTOS)的疗效。方法:2023年1月至2024年1月,选取34例确诊为NTOS的患者作为治疗组,均行超声引导下C5神经根及椎前筋膜切口水解术。为了进行比较,还包括一个由34名健康参与者组成的对照组。术前、术后1、6周分别行超声测量,包括椎前筋膜厚度、C5神经根与筋膜的距离、C5神经根的横截面积(CSA)。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和臂、肩、手残疾(DASH)评分评估疼痛强度和功能状态。结果:NTOS组术前测量显示椎前筋膜厚度增加(中位数:0.1 mm [IQR 0.08-0.12]), C5神经根与筋膜之间的距离缩短(中位数:0.13 mm [IQR 0.10-0.16]), C5神经根CSA增大(中位数:0.08 mm²[IQR 0.06-0.10])。治疗后,VAS评分从1周的中位数7 (IQR 6-8)显著提高到2 (IQR 2-3),并在6周保持稳定,DASH评分从1周的85 (IQR 82-89)提高到34 (IQR 31-36), 6周的33。结论:超声引导下C5神经根水解剖联合椎前筋膜切开是一种有效的微创治疗NTOS的方法。
Ultrasound-Guided the Prevertebral Fascia Incise and the C5 Root Hydrodissection for the Treatment of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: an Application Study.
Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of the C5 nerve root, in combination with prevertebral fascia incision, as a treatment for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS).
Methods: Between January 2023 and January 2024, a total of 34 patients diagnosed with NTOS were enrolled in the treatment group, all of whom underwent ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of the C5 nerve root and prevertebral fascia incision. A control group consisting of 34 healthy participants was also included for comparative purposes. Preoperative and postoperative ultrasound measurements were taken at 1 and 6 weeks, including the thickness of the prevertebral fascia, the distance between the C5 nerve root and fascia, and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the C5 nerve root. Pain intensity and functional status were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores.
Results: Preoperative measurements in the NTOS group showed increased prevertebral fascia thickness (median: 0.1 mm [IQR 0.08-0.12]), reduced distance between the C5 nerve root and the fascia (median: 0.13 mm [IQR 0.10-0.16]), and a larger CSA of the C5 nerve root (median: 0.08 mm² [IQR 0.06-0.10]). Post-treatment, VAS scores significantly improved from a median of 7 (IQR 6-8) to 2 (IQR 2-3) at 1 week and remained stable at 6 weeks, while DASH scores improved from 85 (IQR 82-89) to 34 (IQR 31-36) at 1 week and 33 at 6 weeks.
Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of the C5 nerve root, along with prevertebral fascia incision, is an effective, minimally invasive treatment for NTOS.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.