一项多地点、随机、平行组、对照试验:虚拟递送霎哈嘉三摩地冥想治疗慢性疼痛患者的中度抑郁症状

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-06-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S515229
Darren K Cheng, Robert Simpson, Rahim Moineddin, Joel Katz, Benoit H Mulsant, Akshya Vasudev, Michelle Greiver, Fardous Hosseiny, Marco Inzitari, Ronnie I Newman, Leon Rivlin, Kirk D Foat, Andrea D Furlan, John Francis Flannery, Deanna Telner, Rachael Bosma, Michelle Naimer, Chadwick Chung, Andrew D Pinto, Michelle L A Nelson, Ross Upshur, Abhimanyu Sud
{"title":"一项多地点、随机、平行组、对照试验:虚拟递送霎哈嘉三摩地冥想治疗慢性疼痛患者的中度抑郁症状","authors":"Darren K Cheng, Robert Simpson, Rahim Moineddin, Joel Katz, Benoit H Mulsant, Akshya Vasudev, Michelle Greiver, Fardous Hosseiny, Marco Inzitari, Ronnie I Newman, Leon Rivlin, Kirk D Foat, Andrea D Furlan, John Francis Flannery, Deanna Telner, Rachael Bosma, Michelle Naimer, Chadwick Chung, Andrew D Pinto, Michelle L A Nelson, Ross Upshur, Abhimanyu Sud","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S515229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain (CP) often co-occurs with depression, but promising scalable interventions have been under-investigated. We assessed the effectiveness of the virtually-delivered Sahaj Samadhi Meditation (SSM) program in reducing depressive symptoms in people with CP and moderate depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing SSM to the Health Enhancement Program (HEP), an active control. Participants were recruited from multiple sites in the Greater Toronto Area and virtually. Both 12-week programs were delivered virtually in groups by appropriately trained facilitators. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04039568.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 108 participants enrolled, 89 were randomized to SSM (n=43) or HEP (n=46). Between-group differences for the PHQ-9 were not significant. Within-group mean differences for SSM were significant and greater than the minimal clinically important difference at both 12 weeks and 24 weeks (-3.97 (95% CI -6.69 to -1.24) and -4.96 (-8.36 to -1.56), respectively), while within-group mean differences were not significant for HEP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests potential benefits of SSM for individuals with comorbid CP and depression. Future trials should include larger sample sizes in non-pandemic conditions to better evaluate the effectiveness of SSM. Further research should also explore pragmatic trial designs and the integration of mind-body interventions in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"2925-2946"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multi-Site, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Controlled Trial of Virtually-Delivered Sahaj Samadhi Meditation for the Management of Moderate Depressive Symptoms in Chronic Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Darren K Cheng, Robert Simpson, Rahim Moineddin, Joel Katz, Benoit H Mulsant, Akshya Vasudev, Michelle Greiver, Fardous Hosseiny, Marco Inzitari, Ronnie I Newman, Leon Rivlin, Kirk D Foat, Andrea D Furlan, John Francis Flannery, Deanna Telner, Rachael Bosma, Michelle Naimer, Chadwick Chung, Andrew D Pinto, Michelle L A Nelson, Ross Upshur, Abhimanyu Sud\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S515229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain (CP) often co-occurs with depression, but promising scalable interventions have been under-investigated. We assessed the effectiveness of the virtually-delivered Sahaj Samadhi Meditation (SSM) program in reducing depressive symptoms in people with CP and moderate depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing SSM to the Health Enhancement Program (HEP), an active control. Participants were recruited from multiple sites in the Greater Toronto Area and virtually. Both 12-week programs were delivered virtually in groups by appropriately trained facilitators. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04039568.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 108 participants enrolled, 89 were randomized to SSM (n=43) or HEP (n=46). Between-group differences for the PHQ-9 were not significant. Within-group mean differences for SSM were significant and greater than the minimal clinically important difference at both 12 weeks and 24 weeks (-3.97 (95% CI -6.69 to -1.24) and -4.96 (-8.36 to -1.56), respectively), while within-group mean differences were not significant for HEP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests potential benefits of SSM for individuals with comorbid CP and depression. Future trials should include larger sample sizes in non-pandemic conditions to better evaluate the effectiveness of SSM. Further research should also explore pragmatic trial designs and the integration of mind-body interventions in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2925-2946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174915/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S515229\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S515229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性疼痛(CP)通常与抑郁症同时发生,但有希望的可扩展干预措施尚未得到充分研究。我们评估了虚拟递送的Sahaj Samadhi Meditation (SSM)项目在减轻CP患者和中度抑郁症状方面的有效性。方法:我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较SSM和健康增强计划(HEP),一个主动对照。参与者是从大多伦多地区的多个地点招募的。这两个为期12周的项目都是由经过适当培训的辅导员分组进行的。在基线、12周和24周使用患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)评估抑郁症状。ClinicalTrials.gov注册号:NCT04039568。结果:在108名参与者中,89名被随机分配到SSM组(n=43)或HEP组(n=46)。PHQ-9组间差异无统计学意义。SSM组内平均差异显著,大于12周和24周的最小临床重要差异(分别为-3.97 (95% CI -6.69至-1.24)和-4.96 (95% CI -8.36至-1.56)),而HEP组内平均差异无统计学意义。结论:本研究提示SSM对合并CP和抑郁症的个体有潜在的益处。未来的试验应包括在非大流行条件下的更大样本量,以更好地评估SSM的有效性。进一步的研究还应该探索实用的试验设计和在临床环境中整合身心干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Multi-Site, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Controlled Trial of Virtually-Delivered Sahaj Samadhi Meditation for the Management of Moderate Depressive Symptoms in Chronic Pain.

Background: Chronic pain (CP) often co-occurs with depression, but promising scalable interventions have been under-investigated. We assessed the effectiveness of the virtually-delivered Sahaj Samadhi Meditation (SSM) program in reducing depressive symptoms in people with CP and moderate depressive symptoms.

Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing SSM to the Health Enhancement Program (HEP), an active control. Participants were recruited from multiple sites in the Greater Toronto Area and virtually. Both 12-week programs were delivered virtually in groups by appropriately trained facilitators. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04039568.

Results: Of 108 participants enrolled, 89 were randomized to SSM (n=43) or HEP (n=46). Between-group differences for the PHQ-9 were not significant. Within-group mean differences for SSM were significant and greater than the minimal clinically important difference at both 12 weeks and 24 weeks (-3.97 (95% CI -6.69 to -1.24) and -4.96 (-8.36 to -1.56), respectively), while within-group mean differences were not significant for HEP.

Conclusion: This study suggests potential benefits of SSM for individuals with comorbid CP and depression. Future trials should include larger sample sizes in non-pandemic conditions to better evaluate the effectiveness of SSM. Further research should also explore pragmatic trial designs and the integration of mind-body interventions in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信