土壤健康和社区福祉:可持续农业无形成果的框架。

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Claire Friedrichsen, Hailey Wilmer, Courtney Hammond Wagner, Alia DeLong
{"title":"土壤健康和社区福祉:可持续农业无形成果的框架。","authors":"Claire Friedrichsen, Hailey Wilmer, Courtney Hammond Wagner, Alia DeLong","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social outcomes of agricultural practice adoption are often excluded from adoption studies, particularly outcomes related to community well-being. In large part, this is because assessing the social well-being outcomes of sustainable agricultural practices lacks a widely accepted framework. This study fills the gap by identifying community well-being domains and attributes related to the impacts of agricultural management. Semi-structured interviews via Zoom with 42 underrepresented producers across the United States during the winter of 2021 captured producers' perceived broader community well-being outcomes of soil health management. Producers were selected to represent Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network sites and interests, a national network of diverse cropping, livestock, and integrated agricultural research sites. Two rounds of coding, first inductive and then deductive, were based on the community well-being framework and the 4Cs of ecosystem assessment: conditions, capabilities, connections, and crosscutting. The data revealed three major domains of how soil health management contributes to the conditions, capabilities, and connections that underlie community well-being, aligning with the 4Cs framework. Within these three domains, we identify 16 attributes specific to agricultural management, including sense of place, recreation and tourism, and community safety, among others. These domains and associated attributes notably expand the range of measurable outcomes of soil health practice adoption. The new data contribute to the development of social sustainability indicators and efforts to foster diversity, equity, and inclusion within agricultural innovation. Additionally, this research provides an empirical, theoretically based framework of social sustainability indicators for agricultural sustainability assessments across the LTAR network.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil health and community well-being: A framework of intangible outcomes of sustainable agriculture.\",\"authors\":\"Claire Friedrichsen, Hailey Wilmer, Courtney Hammond Wagner, Alia DeLong\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeq2.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Social outcomes of agricultural practice adoption are often excluded from adoption studies, particularly outcomes related to community well-being. In large part, this is because assessing the social well-being outcomes of sustainable agricultural practices lacks a widely accepted framework. This study fills the gap by identifying community well-being domains and attributes related to the impacts of agricultural management. Semi-structured interviews via Zoom with 42 underrepresented producers across the United States during the winter of 2021 captured producers' perceived broader community well-being outcomes of soil health management. Producers were selected to represent Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network sites and interests, a national network of diverse cropping, livestock, and integrated agricultural research sites. Two rounds of coding, first inductive and then deductive, were based on the community well-being framework and the 4Cs of ecosystem assessment: conditions, capabilities, connections, and crosscutting. The data revealed three major domains of how soil health management contributes to the conditions, capabilities, and connections that underlie community well-being, aligning with the 4Cs framework. Within these three domains, we identify 16 attributes specific to agricultural management, including sense of place, recreation and tourism, and community safety, among others. These domains and associated attributes notably expand the range of measurable outcomes of soil health practice adoption. The new data contribute to the development of social sustainability indicators and efforts to foster diversity, equity, and inclusion within agricultural innovation. Additionally, this research provides an empirical, theoretically based framework of social sustainability indicators for agricultural sustainability assessments across the LTAR network.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70049\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业实践采用的社会结果往往被排除在采用研究之外,特别是与社区福祉有关的结果。在很大程度上,这是因为评估可持续农业实践的社会福祉结果缺乏一个被广泛接受的框架。本研究通过确定与农业管理影响相关的社区福祉领域和属性来填补这一空白。在2021年冬季,通过Zoom对美国42名代表性不足的生产者进行了半结构化访谈,捕捉了生产者对土壤健康管理的更广泛的社区福祉结果的看法。生产者被选中代表长期农业生态系统研究(LTAR)网络站点和利益,这是一个由多种作物、牲畜和综合农业研究站点组成的国家网络。两轮编码,首先是归纳,然后是演绎,基于社区福祉框架和生态系统评估的4c:条件、能力、联系和横切。数据揭示了土壤健康管理如何促进构成社区福祉基础的条件、能力和联系的三个主要领域,与4c框架保持一致。在这三个领域中,我们确定了农业管理特有的16个属性,包括场所感、娱乐和旅游、社区安全等。这些领域和相关属性显著扩大了采用土壤健康实践可衡量成果的范围。新数据有助于制定社会可持续性指标,并有助于在农业创新中促进多样性、公平性和包容性。此外,本研究还为LTAR网络的农业可持续性评估提供了一个实证的、基于理论的社会可持续性指标框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soil health and community well-being: A framework of intangible outcomes of sustainable agriculture.

Social outcomes of agricultural practice adoption are often excluded from adoption studies, particularly outcomes related to community well-being. In large part, this is because assessing the social well-being outcomes of sustainable agricultural practices lacks a widely accepted framework. This study fills the gap by identifying community well-being domains and attributes related to the impacts of agricultural management. Semi-structured interviews via Zoom with 42 underrepresented producers across the United States during the winter of 2021 captured producers' perceived broader community well-being outcomes of soil health management. Producers were selected to represent Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network sites and interests, a national network of diverse cropping, livestock, and integrated agricultural research sites. Two rounds of coding, first inductive and then deductive, were based on the community well-being framework and the 4Cs of ecosystem assessment: conditions, capabilities, connections, and crosscutting. The data revealed three major domains of how soil health management contributes to the conditions, capabilities, and connections that underlie community well-being, aligning with the 4Cs framework. Within these three domains, we identify 16 attributes specific to agricultural management, including sense of place, recreation and tourism, and community safety, among others. These domains and associated attributes notably expand the range of measurable outcomes of soil health practice adoption. The new data contribute to the development of social sustainability indicators and efforts to foster diversity, equity, and inclusion within agricultural innovation. Additionally, this research provides an empirical, theoretically based framework of social sustainability indicators for agricultural sustainability assessments across the LTAR network.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信