沉思反刍预测晚年抑郁症的认知功能降低:多变量多元回归分析。

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kiara Baker, Warren D Taylor, Sarah M Szymkowicz
{"title":"沉思反刍预测晚年抑郁症的认知功能降低:多变量多元回归分析。","authors":"Kiara Baker, Warren D Taylor, Sarah M Szymkowicz","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2520356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Late-life depression (LLD) is associated with cognitive deficits, particularly in memory and executive functions. Rumination, namely brooding, may also negatively impact cognition. Few studies have investigated multivariate relationships between depressive symptoms and different types of rumination on cognition in LLD, which was the focus of the current study. We also explored whether relationships differed by gender and depression age of onset.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cognition was measured via five cognitive composites (Attention/Working Memory, Processing Speed, Language, Episodic Recall, and Executive Functions). LLD who completed both the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) was used in analyses (<i>n</i> = 91). RRS subscales included Brooding and Reflection rumination. Two separate bootstrapped multivariate multiple regressions examined whether MADRS, Brooding, or Reflection, and their respective interactions predicted cognitive performance after covariate adjustments and Bonferroni correction. Exploratory analyses using similar models but stratified by gender and depression age of onset were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only Brooding significantly predicted cognitive performance in the multivariate omnibus models (<i>F</i>(7,78) = 3.52, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Follow-up univariate analyses showed significant relationships for Language (<i>p</i> = 0.005, BCa 95% CI [-0.09 to -0.02]) and Episodic Recall (<i>p</i> < 0.001, BCa 95% CI [-0.012 to -0.04]) domains, with higher Brooding associated with lower cognitive performances. Exploratory analyses demonstrated a significant multivariate effect of Brooding in both men and women; however, the only significant univariate effect was for Episodic Recall in women (<i>p</i> = 0.025, BCa 95% CI [-0.11 to 0.01]). Age of depression onset was not significant for any of the multivariate models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated Brooding (and not depressive symptoms, Reflection rumination, or their interactions) was associated with lower language and memory functions in LLD. This effect may be greater in women, particularly for memory. Interventions aimed at improving brooding rumination in LLD may also benefit cognitive performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brooding rumination predicts lower cognitive functioning in late-life depression: multivariate multiple regression analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Kiara Baker, Warren D Taylor, Sarah M Szymkowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13803395.2025.2520356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Late-life depression (LLD) is associated with cognitive deficits, particularly in memory and executive functions. Rumination, namely brooding, may also negatively impact cognition. Few studies have investigated multivariate relationships between depressive symptoms and different types of rumination on cognition in LLD, which was the focus of the current study. We also explored whether relationships differed by gender and depression age of onset.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cognition was measured via five cognitive composites (Attention/Working Memory, Processing Speed, Language, Episodic Recall, and Executive Functions). LLD who completed both the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) was used in analyses (<i>n</i> = 91). RRS subscales included Brooding and Reflection rumination. Two separate bootstrapped multivariate multiple regressions examined whether MADRS, Brooding, or Reflection, and their respective interactions predicted cognitive performance after covariate adjustments and Bonferroni correction. Exploratory analyses using similar models but stratified by gender and depression age of onset were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only Brooding significantly predicted cognitive performance in the multivariate omnibus models (<i>F</i>(7,78) = 3.52, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Follow-up univariate analyses showed significant relationships for Language (<i>p</i> = 0.005, BCa 95% CI [-0.09 to -0.02]) and Episodic Recall (<i>p</i> < 0.001, BCa 95% CI [-0.012 to -0.04]) domains, with higher Brooding associated with lower cognitive performances. Exploratory analyses demonstrated a significant multivariate effect of Brooding in both men and women; however, the only significant univariate effect was for Episodic Recall in women (<i>p</i> = 0.025, BCa 95% CI [-0.11 to 0.01]). Age of depression onset was not significant for any of the multivariate models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated Brooding (and not depressive symptoms, Reflection rumination, or their interactions) was associated with lower language and memory functions in LLD. This effect may be greater in women, particularly for memory. Interventions aimed at improving brooding rumination in LLD may also benefit cognitive performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2520356\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2520356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年抑郁症(LLD)与认知缺陷有关,特别是在记忆和执行功能方面。沉思,即沉思,也可能对认知产生负面影响。研究抑郁症患者抑郁症状与不同类型的认知反刍之间的多变量关系的研究较少,这是当前研究的重点。我们还探讨了性别和抑郁发病年龄是否会造成关系的差异。方法:通过五种认知组合(注意/工作记忆、处理速度、语言、情景回忆和执行功能)来测量认知。完成Montgomery Asberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)和反思反应量表(RRS)的LLD被用于分析(n = 91)。RRS子量表包括沉思和反思反刍。两个独立的自举多元回归检验了MADRS、broding或Reflection及其各自的相互作用是否预测了协变量调整和Bonferroni校正后的认知表现。探索性分析使用类似的模型,但分层的性别和抑郁症的发病年龄也进行了。结果:在多元综合模型中,只有忧郁能显著预测认知表现(F(7,78) = 3.52, p = 0.006)。随访单变量分析显示语言(p = 0.005, BCa 95% CI[-0.09 ~ -0.02])和情景回忆(p = 0.025, BCa 95% CI[-0.11 ~ 0.01])之间存在显著相关性。抑郁症发病年龄在任何多变量模型中都不显著。结论:升高的沉思(而不是抑郁症状、反思反刍或它们的相互作用)与LLD患者较低的语言和记忆功能有关。这种影响在女性身上可能更大,尤其是在记忆力方面。旨在改善LLD的沉思反刍的干预措施也可能有利于认知表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brooding rumination predicts lower cognitive functioning in late-life depression: multivariate multiple regression analyses.

Introduction: Late-life depression (LLD) is associated with cognitive deficits, particularly in memory and executive functions. Rumination, namely brooding, may also negatively impact cognition. Few studies have investigated multivariate relationships between depressive symptoms and different types of rumination on cognition in LLD, which was the focus of the current study. We also explored whether relationships differed by gender and depression age of onset.

Method: Cognition was measured via five cognitive composites (Attention/Working Memory, Processing Speed, Language, Episodic Recall, and Executive Functions). LLD who completed both the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) was used in analyses (n = 91). RRS subscales included Brooding and Reflection rumination. Two separate bootstrapped multivariate multiple regressions examined whether MADRS, Brooding, or Reflection, and their respective interactions predicted cognitive performance after covariate adjustments and Bonferroni correction. Exploratory analyses using similar models but stratified by gender and depression age of onset were also conducted.

Results: Only Brooding significantly predicted cognitive performance in the multivariate omnibus models (F(7,78) = 3.52, p = 0.006). Follow-up univariate analyses showed significant relationships for Language (p = 0.005, BCa 95% CI [-0.09 to -0.02]) and Episodic Recall (p < 0.001, BCa 95% CI [-0.012 to -0.04]) domains, with higher Brooding associated with lower cognitive performances. Exploratory analyses demonstrated a significant multivariate effect of Brooding in both men and women; however, the only significant univariate effect was for Episodic Recall in women (p = 0.025, BCa 95% CI [-0.11 to 0.01]). Age of depression onset was not significant for any of the multivariate models.

Conclusion: Elevated Brooding (and not depressive symptoms, Reflection rumination, or their interactions) was associated with lower language and memory functions in LLD. This effect may be greater in women, particularly for memory. Interventions aimed at improving brooding rumination in LLD may also benefit cognitive performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信