IMSA101是一种新型环二核苷酸STING激动剂,用于晚期实体恶性肿瘤患者的i期临床剂量递增研究。

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Jay Jacoby, Deva Mahalingam, Angela Alistar, Edward Garmey, Syed Kazmi, Teresa Mooneyham, Lijun Sun, Timothy A Yap, Peter Vu, Justin Moser
{"title":"IMSA101是一种新型环二核苷酸STING激动剂,用于晚期实体恶性肿瘤患者的i期临床剂量递增研究。","authors":"Jay Jacoby, Deva Mahalingam, Angela Alistar, Edward Garmey, Syed Kazmi, Teresa Mooneyham, Lijun Sun, Timothy A Yap, Peter Vu, Justin Moser","doi":"10.1136/jitc-2025-011572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite progress in cancer therapeutics, there remains an unmet need for treatment of advanced solid tumors. The cGAS-cGAMP-STING pathway plays a pivotal role in innate antitumor immunity processes. IMSA101 is a small molecule analog of cGAMP and a potent STING agonist. Preclinical studies demonstrate antitumor activity of IMSA101 alone and in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IMSA101-101 was an open-label, multicenter, phase 1 first-in-human dose-escalation study to establish a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of IMSA101 both as monotherapy and in combination with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-(L)1)-ICI. Secondary objectives were to evaluate safety, tolerability and antitumor activity, and to characterize pharmacokinetics. Adult patients with advanced solid tumors with ≥2 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors evaluable lesions, at least one of these suitable for injection, were enrolled. IMSA101 was administered by intratumoral injection with weekly injections for the first 3 weeks, followed by biweekly injections. The dose escalation explored doses of 100-1,200 µg (monotherapy) and 800-2,400 µg (combination therapy with ICI) in a 3+3 design. No formal statistical analysis was planned for this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>40 patients (22 monotherapy, 18 combination therapy) received at least one dose of IMSA101. IMSA101 1,200 µg (monotherapy) and 2,400 µg (combination therapy) doses, well-tolerated and associated with signs of antitumor activity, were selected as provisional RP2Ds. The most common IMSA101-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were injection site pain (8 (36.4%)) and fatigue (4 (18.2%)) for monotherapy and chills (3 (16.7%)), injection site pain (2 (11.1%)), and fever (2 (11.1%)) for combination therapy. No clear dose-response relationship between IMSA101 and occurrence of TEAEs was observed. The elimination half-life of plasma IMSA101 was approximately 1.5-2 hours, with no reported plasma accumulation. With monotherapy, no patients achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), so overall response rate (ORR) was not determined; 17 (77.3%) patients had progressive disease (PD) and one patient (4.5%, 400 µg cohort) had stable disease (SD) as best response. With combination therapy, ORR was 5.6%; remaining patients had PD (10 (55.6%)) and SD (2 (11.1%)) as their best response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IMSA101 doses of 1,200 µg (monotherapy arm) and 2,400 µg (combination therapy arm) were well tolerated but demonstrated minimal signals of antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04020185.</p>","PeriodicalId":14820,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase 1 first-in-human dose-escalation study of IMSA101, a novel cyclic di-nucleotide STING agonist, for patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies.\",\"authors\":\"Jay Jacoby, Deva Mahalingam, Angela Alistar, Edward Garmey, Syed Kazmi, Teresa Mooneyham, Lijun Sun, Timothy A Yap, Peter Vu, Justin Moser\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jitc-2025-011572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite progress in cancer therapeutics, there remains an unmet need for treatment of advanced solid tumors. The cGAS-cGAMP-STING pathway plays a pivotal role in innate antitumor immunity processes. IMSA101 is a small molecule analog of cGAMP and a potent STING agonist. Preclinical studies demonstrate antitumor activity of IMSA101 alone and in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IMSA101-101 was an open-label, multicenter, phase 1 first-in-human dose-escalation study to establish a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of IMSA101 both as monotherapy and in combination with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-(L)1)-ICI. Secondary objectives were to evaluate safety, tolerability and antitumor activity, and to characterize pharmacokinetics. Adult patients with advanced solid tumors with ≥2 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors evaluable lesions, at least one of these suitable for injection, were enrolled. IMSA101 was administered by intratumoral injection with weekly injections for the first 3 weeks, followed by biweekly injections. The dose escalation explored doses of 100-1,200 µg (monotherapy) and 800-2,400 µg (combination therapy with ICI) in a 3+3 design. No formal statistical analysis was planned for this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>40 patients (22 monotherapy, 18 combination therapy) received at least one dose of IMSA101. IMSA101 1,200 µg (monotherapy) and 2,400 µg (combination therapy) doses, well-tolerated and associated with signs of antitumor activity, were selected as provisional RP2Ds. The most common IMSA101-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were injection site pain (8 (36.4%)) and fatigue (4 (18.2%)) for monotherapy and chills (3 (16.7%)), injection site pain (2 (11.1%)), and fever (2 (11.1%)) for combination therapy. No clear dose-response relationship between IMSA101 and occurrence of TEAEs was observed. The elimination half-life of plasma IMSA101 was approximately 1.5-2 hours, with no reported plasma accumulation. With monotherapy, no patients achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), so overall response rate (ORR) was not determined; 17 (77.3%) patients had progressive disease (PD) and one patient (4.5%, 400 µg cohort) had stable disease (SD) as best response. With combination therapy, ORR was 5.6%; remaining patients had PD (10 (55.6%)) and SD (2 (11.1%)) as their best response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IMSA101 doses of 1,200 µg (monotherapy arm) and 2,400 µg (combination therapy arm) were well tolerated but demonstrated minimal signals of antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04020185.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182170/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2025-011572\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2025-011572","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管癌症治疗取得了进展,但晚期实体瘤的治疗需求仍未得到满足。cGAS-cGAMP-STING通路在先天抗肿瘤免疫过程中起关键作用。IMSA101是cGAMP的小分子类似物,也是一种有效的STING激动剂。临床前研究表明,IMSA101单独使用和与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合使用具有抗肿瘤活性。方法:IMSA101-101是一项开放标签、多中心、1期首次人体剂量递增研究,旨在建立IMSA101的推荐2期剂量(RP2D),既可作为单药治疗,也可与程序性死亡配体1 (PD-(L)1)- ici联合使用。次要目的是评估安全性、耐受性和抗肿瘤活性,并表征药代动力学。入选的成年晚期实体瘤患者在可评估的实体瘤病变中具有≥2个应答评价标准,其中至少有一个适合注射。IMSA101采用瘤内注射,前3周每周注射一次,随后每两周注射一次。剂量递增研究采用3+3设计,分别为100- 1200µg(单药治疗)和800- 2400µg (ICI联合治疗)。本研究未计划进行正式的统计分析。结果:40例患者(22例单药治疗,18例联合治疗)接受了至少一剂IMSA101治疗。选择IMSA101 1200µg(单一治疗)和2400µg(联合治疗)剂量作为临时RP2Ds,耐受性良好且具有抗肿瘤活性的迹象。最常见的与imsa101相关的治疗不良事件(teae)是单药治疗的注射部位疼痛(8例(36.4%))和疲劳(4例(18.2%)),联合治疗的寒战(3例(16.7%)),注射部位疼痛(2例(11.1%))和发热(2例(11.1%))。IMSA101与teae的发生没有明显的剂量-反应关系。血浆IMSA101的消除半衰期约为1.5-2小时,无血浆积累的报道。在单药治疗中,没有患者达到完全缓解(CR)或部分缓解(PR),因此无法确定总缓解率(ORR);17例(77.3%)患者病情进展(PD), 1例(4.5%,400µg队列)患者病情稳定(SD)为最佳反应。联合治疗的ORR为5.6%;其余患者以PD(10例(55.6%))和SD(2例(11.1%))为最佳缓解。结论:IMSA101剂量1200µg(单一治疗组)和2400µg(联合治疗组)耐受性良好,但在晚期实体瘤患者中显示出最小的抗肿瘤活性信号。试验注册号:NCT04020185。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phase 1 first-in-human dose-escalation study of IMSA101, a novel cyclic di-nucleotide STING agonist, for patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies.

Background: Despite progress in cancer therapeutics, there remains an unmet need for treatment of advanced solid tumors. The cGAS-cGAMP-STING pathway plays a pivotal role in innate antitumor immunity processes. IMSA101 is a small molecule analog of cGAMP and a potent STING agonist. Preclinical studies demonstrate antitumor activity of IMSA101 alone and in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods: IMSA101-101 was an open-label, multicenter, phase 1 first-in-human dose-escalation study to establish a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of IMSA101 both as monotherapy and in combination with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-(L)1)-ICI. Secondary objectives were to evaluate safety, tolerability and antitumor activity, and to characterize pharmacokinetics. Adult patients with advanced solid tumors with ≥2 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors evaluable lesions, at least one of these suitable for injection, were enrolled. IMSA101 was administered by intratumoral injection with weekly injections for the first 3 weeks, followed by biweekly injections. The dose escalation explored doses of 100-1,200 µg (monotherapy) and 800-2,400 µg (combination therapy with ICI) in a 3+3 design. No formal statistical analysis was planned for this study.

Results: 40 patients (22 monotherapy, 18 combination therapy) received at least one dose of IMSA101. IMSA101 1,200 µg (monotherapy) and 2,400 µg (combination therapy) doses, well-tolerated and associated with signs of antitumor activity, were selected as provisional RP2Ds. The most common IMSA101-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were injection site pain (8 (36.4%)) and fatigue (4 (18.2%)) for monotherapy and chills (3 (16.7%)), injection site pain (2 (11.1%)), and fever (2 (11.1%)) for combination therapy. No clear dose-response relationship between IMSA101 and occurrence of TEAEs was observed. The elimination half-life of plasma IMSA101 was approximately 1.5-2 hours, with no reported plasma accumulation. With monotherapy, no patients achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), so overall response rate (ORR) was not determined; 17 (77.3%) patients had progressive disease (PD) and one patient (4.5%, 400 µg cohort) had stable disease (SD) as best response. With combination therapy, ORR was 5.6%; remaining patients had PD (10 (55.6%)) and SD (2 (11.1%)) as their best response.

Conclusions: IMSA101 doses of 1,200 µg (monotherapy arm) and 2,400 µg (combination therapy arm) were well tolerated but demonstrated minimal signals of antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Trial registration number: NCT04020185.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
4.60%
发文量
522
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) is a peer-reviewed publication that promotes scientific exchange and deepens knowledge in the constantly evolving fields of tumor immunology and cancer immunotherapy. With an open access format, JITC encourages widespread access to its findings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, spanning from basic science to translational and clinical research. Key areas of interest include tumor-host interactions, the intricate tumor microenvironment, animal models, the identification of predictive and prognostic immune biomarkers, groundbreaking pharmaceutical and cellular therapies, innovative vaccines, combination immune-based treatments, and the study of immune-related toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信