{"title":"心力衰竭患者活动受限的严重程度和不良后果。","authors":"Kotaro Iwatsu, Kensuke Takabayashi, Tomoyuki Hamada, Toru Kubo, Tsutomu Ikeda, Shoji Kitaguchi, Tetsuhisa Kitamura, Takeshi Kimura, Hiroaki Kitaoka, Ryuji Nohara","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobility limitation is prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF), but the dose-response relationship between its severity and adverse outcomes remains unquantified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a patient-level pooled analysis of two prospective Japanese cohort studies, including 2103 hospitalised patients with HF with no exclusion criteria. Mobility limitation at discharge was categorised into four levels: category I (independent outdoor walking), category II (indoor independence but requiring outdoor assistance), category III (requiring indoor assistance) and category IV (unable to walk). The primary endpoint was a 2-year composite of HF rehospitalisation or all-cause mortality. Adjusted analyses accounted for age, sex, comorbidities, biomarkers and medications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2820.7 person-years of follow-up, 998 composite outcomes occurred. Incidence rates per 100 person-years for the primary outcome increased with mobility limitation severity: 24.9 (category I), 47.0 (II), 59.3 (III) and 84.8 (IV) (p for trend <0.001). Adjusted HRs (95% CI) using category I as reference were 1.22 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.45) for II, 1.39 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.73) for III and 1.71 (95% CI 1.34 to 2.20) for IV. While the graded association was clear for mortality, it was less evident for HF rehospitalisation alone, likely reflecting competing mortality risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates a strong and graded association between mobility limitation severity and adverse outcomes in HF, suggesting its utility for refined risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":12835,"journal":{"name":"Heart","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Severity of mobility limitation and adverse outcomes in heart failure.\",\"authors\":\"Kotaro Iwatsu, Kensuke Takabayashi, Tomoyuki Hamada, Toru Kubo, Tsutomu Ikeda, Shoji Kitaguchi, Tetsuhisa Kitamura, Takeshi Kimura, Hiroaki Kitaoka, Ryuji Nohara\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobility limitation is prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF), but the dose-response relationship between its severity and adverse outcomes remains unquantified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a patient-level pooled analysis of two prospective Japanese cohort studies, including 2103 hospitalised patients with HF with no exclusion criteria. Mobility limitation at discharge was categorised into four levels: category I (independent outdoor walking), category II (indoor independence but requiring outdoor assistance), category III (requiring indoor assistance) and category IV (unable to walk). The primary endpoint was a 2-year composite of HF rehospitalisation or all-cause mortality. Adjusted analyses accounted for age, sex, comorbidities, biomarkers and medications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2820.7 person-years of follow-up, 998 composite outcomes occurred. Incidence rates per 100 person-years for the primary outcome increased with mobility limitation severity: 24.9 (category I), 47.0 (II), 59.3 (III) and 84.8 (IV) (p for trend <0.001). Adjusted HRs (95% CI) using category I as reference were 1.22 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.45) for II, 1.39 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.73) for III and 1.71 (95% CI 1.34 to 2.20) for IV. While the graded association was clear for mortality, it was less evident for HF rehospitalisation alone, likely reflecting competing mortality risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates a strong and graded association between mobility limitation severity and adverse outcomes in HF, suggesting its utility for refined risk stratification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325120\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Severity of mobility limitation and adverse outcomes in heart failure.
Background: Mobility limitation is prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF), but the dose-response relationship between its severity and adverse outcomes remains unquantified.
Methods: We conducted a patient-level pooled analysis of two prospective Japanese cohort studies, including 2103 hospitalised patients with HF with no exclusion criteria. Mobility limitation at discharge was categorised into four levels: category I (independent outdoor walking), category II (indoor independence but requiring outdoor assistance), category III (requiring indoor assistance) and category IV (unable to walk). The primary endpoint was a 2-year composite of HF rehospitalisation or all-cause mortality. Adjusted analyses accounted for age, sex, comorbidities, biomarkers and medications.
Results: Among 2820.7 person-years of follow-up, 998 composite outcomes occurred. Incidence rates per 100 person-years for the primary outcome increased with mobility limitation severity: 24.9 (category I), 47.0 (II), 59.3 (III) and 84.8 (IV) (p for trend <0.001). Adjusted HRs (95% CI) using category I as reference were 1.22 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.45) for II, 1.39 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.73) for III and 1.71 (95% CI 1.34 to 2.20) for IV. While the graded association was clear for mortality, it was less evident for HF rehospitalisation alone, likely reflecting competing mortality risks.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates a strong and graded association between mobility limitation severity and adverse outcomes in HF, suggesting its utility for refined risk stratification.
期刊介绍:
Heart is an international peer reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with important research advances in cardiovascular disease. New scientific developments are highlighted in editorials and put in context with concise review articles. There is one free Editor’s Choice article in each issue, with open access options available to authors for all articles. Education in Heart articles provide a comprehensive, continuously updated, cardiology curriculum.