Emily H Ho, Berivan Ece, Caroline Clingan, Anne Zola, Zutima Tuladhar, Magdalena Ewa Kupczyk, Linda S Adair, Richard Gershon
{"title":"3-17岁社区儿童远程家庭血压振荡监测的可靠性。","authors":"Emily H Ho, Berivan Ece, Caroline Clingan, Anne Zola, Zutima Tuladhar, Magdalena Ewa Kupczyk, Linda S Adair, Richard Gershon","doi":"10.3389/fped.2025.1565266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As hypertension becomes more prevalent, remote assessment of blood pressure (BP) has been proposed as a method to improve BP management in the pediatric population. We investigated the reliability of at-home BP monitoring in children ages 3-17.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted at six sites across the United States. Children participated in three BP measurements on one occasion by caregivers at home and, on another separate occasion, by trained examiners in a clinic setting. The results were averaged and classified according to the 2017 Pediatric Hypertension Guidelines as normal BP, elevated BP, stage 1 hypertension, or stage 2 hypertension. We collapsed participants with elevated BP, stage 1 hypertension, or stage 2 hypertension into one group: above-normal. We examined the agreement between the caregivers' and examiners' BP readings and the ease of the measurement process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred eighteen (118) children participated in this study (48.3% male; mean age 9.65 ± 4.52 years). Most caregivers (78%-93%) and examiners (88%-99%) rated elements of BP measurement as \"easy\" or \"very easy\". Caregiver and examiners' agreement on BP classification as normal or above-normal ranged from 75.00% to 90.16% across age groups. Caregiver and examiner BP concordance significantly differed by age group (<i>p</i> = .03) and was lower among children with above-normal BPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, most aspects of the remote BP measurement process were rated as easy, suggesting that remote monitoring of BP in children is feasible. Concordance of BP measurements by caregivers and examiners was high for children in the normal BP range. More research is needed on the reliability of home BP monitoring across the pediatric age range for those with above-normal BP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"13 ","pages":"1565266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of remote at-home oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in community-dwelling children aged 3-17.\",\"authors\":\"Emily H Ho, Berivan Ece, Caroline Clingan, Anne Zola, Zutima Tuladhar, Magdalena Ewa Kupczyk, Linda S Adair, Richard Gershon\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fped.2025.1565266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As hypertension becomes more prevalent, remote assessment of blood pressure (BP) has been proposed as a method to improve BP management in the pediatric population. We investigated the reliability of at-home BP monitoring in children ages 3-17.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted at six sites across the United States. Children participated in three BP measurements on one occasion by caregivers at home and, on another separate occasion, by trained examiners in a clinic setting. The results were averaged and classified according to the 2017 Pediatric Hypertension Guidelines as normal BP, elevated BP, stage 1 hypertension, or stage 2 hypertension. We collapsed participants with elevated BP, stage 1 hypertension, or stage 2 hypertension into one group: above-normal. We examined the agreement between the caregivers' and examiners' BP readings and the ease of the measurement process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred eighteen (118) children participated in this study (48.3% male; mean age 9.65 ± 4.52 years). Most caregivers (78%-93%) and examiners (88%-99%) rated elements of BP measurement as \\\"easy\\\" or \\\"very easy\\\". Caregiver and examiners' agreement on BP classification as normal or above-normal ranged from 75.00% to 90.16% across age groups. Caregiver and examiner BP concordance significantly differed by age group (<i>p</i> = .03) and was lower among children with above-normal BPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, most aspects of the remote BP measurement process were rated as easy, suggesting that remote monitoring of BP in children is feasible. Concordance of BP measurements by caregivers and examiners was high for children in the normal BP range. More research is needed on the reliability of home BP monitoring across the pediatric age range for those with above-normal BP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1565266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174106/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1565266\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1565266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliability of remote at-home oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in community-dwelling children aged 3-17.
Background: As hypertension becomes more prevalent, remote assessment of blood pressure (BP) has been proposed as a method to improve BP management in the pediatric population. We investigated the reliability of at-home BP monitoring in children ages 3-17.
Methods: This study was conducted at six sites across the United States. Children participated in three BP measurements on one occasion by caregivers at home and, on another separate occasion, by trained examiners in a clinic setting. The results were averaged and classified according to the 2017 Pediatric Hypertension Guidelines as normal BP, elevated BP, stage 1 hypertension, or stage 2 hypertension. We collapsed participants with elevated BP, stage 1 hypertension, or stage 2 hypertension into one group: above-normal. We examined the agreement between the caregivers' and examiners' BP readings and the ease of the measurement process.
Results: One hundred eighteen (118) children participated in this study (48.3% male; mean age 9.65 ± 4.52 years). Most caregivers (78%-93%) and examiners (88%-99%) rated elements of BP measurement as "easy" or "very easy". Caregiver and examiners' agreement on BP classification as normal or above-normal ranged from 75.00% to 90.16% across age groups. Caregiver and examiner BP concordance significantly differed by age group (p = .03) and was lower among children with above-normal BPs.
Conclusions: Overall, most aspects of the remote BP measurement process were rated as easy, suggesting that remote monitoring of BP in children is feasible. Concordance of BP measurements by caregivers and examiners was high for children in the normal BP range. More research is needed on the reliability of home BP monitoring across the pediatric age range for those with above-normal BP.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.