{"title":"开放标签安慰剂可以减轻疼痛,但在慢性疼痛患者麸质挑战期间不能缓解消化不良。","authors":"Lena Paschke-Dahl, Regine Klinger","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary interventions have become a management tool for chronic pain conditions over the past few decades. Certain diets, such as gluten-free diets, are perceived as particularly beneficial by patients, although there is no evidence to support this. Studies that have investigated this topic have focused little on possible expectation effects that could be involved in symptom development or pain increase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a 2×2 study design with repeated measurements to test treatment effects, we investigated 26 patients with fibromyalgia (FMS). Additional chronic pain conditions were included and analyzed exploratively. However, the main analysis focused on fibromyalgia patients. Participants underwent an oral food challenge (OFC) with double-blinded gluten or alleged gluten (sham gluten). All of them received an OLP with different instructions to treat negative effects of the porridge. Treatment expectations were modulated by either neutral or positive instructions regarding the OLPs. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups: (1) gluten and neutral instructions; (2) gluten and positive instructions; (3) sham gluten and neutral instructions; and (4) sham gluten and positive instructions. Expectations before (T0) and after the instructions (T0.1) as well as pain and indigestion before (T0) and after the OFC (T1 30min, T2 30-180min, T3 240min) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In FMS patients, a significant interaction with instructions were observed (<i>p</i> = 0.048). Positive instructions led to a decrease in pain (T0-T2) while neutral instructions led to an increase in pain. However, <i>post-hoc</i> comparisons did not reveal significant group differences. No interaction was found with gluten (<i>p</i> = 0.65). Positive instructions increased positive treatment expectations but missed significance marginally (<i>p</i> = 0.06), while negative expectations decreased for all participants regardless of instructions (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A strong correlation was found between expected and actual pain relief (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Digestive discomfort increased temporarily post-intervention (<i>p</i> < 0.004) but returned to baseline after 4 h. No significant effects of gluten (<i>p</i> = 0.15) or instructions (<i>p</i> = 0.8) on indigestion were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the complex interplay of disease type, placebo effects, and expectations in chronic pain conditions during gluten provocation. While gluten itself showed no significant impact on pain or indigestion, positive instructions significantly enhanced perceived pain relief. These findings suggest that expectation effects, rather than gluten, may play a more central role in symptom modulation, at least for pain. Future research should focus on expectation-driven mechanisms to better understand and optimize dietary interventions in chronic pain management and differences across pain diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1572761"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open-Label-Placebos can reduce pain, but not indigestion during gluten challenge in chronic pain patients.\",\"authors\":\"Lena Paschke-Dahl, Regine Klinger\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary interventions have become a management tool for chronic pain conditions over the past few decades. Certain diets, such as gluten-free diets, are perceived as particularly beneficial by patients, although there is no evidence to support this. Studies that have investigated this topic have focused little on possible expectation effects that could be involved in symptom development or pain increase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a 2×2 study design with repeated measurements to test treatment effects, we investigated 26 patients with fibromyalgia (FMS). Additional chronic pain conditions were included and analyzed exploratively. However, the main analysis focused on fibromyalgia patients. Participants underwent an oral food challenge (OFC) with double-blinded gluten or alleged gluten (sham gluten). All of them received an OLP with different instructions to treat negative effects of the porridge. Treatment expectations were modulated by either neutral or positive instructions regarding the OLPs. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups: (1) gluten and neutral instructions; (2) gluten and positive instructions; (3) sham gluten and neutral instructions; and (4) sham gluten and positive instructions. Expectations before (T0) and after the instructions (T0.1) as well as pain and indigestion before (T0) and after the OFC (T1 30min, T2 30-180min, T3 240min) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In FMS patients, a significant interaction with instructions were observed (<i>p</i> = 0.048). Positive instructions led to a decrease in pain (T0-T2) while neutral instructions led to an increase in pain. However, <i>post-hoc</i> comparisons did not reveal significant group differences. No interaction was found with gluten (<i>p</i> = 0.65). Positive instructions increased positive treatment expectations but missed significance marginally (<i>p</i> = 0.06), while negative expectations decreased for all participants regardless of instructions (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A strong correlation was found between expected and actual pain relief (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Digestive discomfort increased temporarily post-intervention (<i>p</i> < 0.004) but returned to baseline after 4 h. No significant effects of gluten (<i>p</i> = 0.15) or instructions (<i>p</i> = 0.8) on indigestion were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the complex interplay of disease type, placebo effects, and expectations in chronic pain conditions during gluten provocation. While gluten itself showed no significant impact on pain or indigestion, positive instructions significantly enhanced perceived pain relief. These findings suggest that expectation effects, rather than gluten, may play a more central role in symptom modulation, at least for pain. Future research should focus on expectation-driven mechanisms to better understand and optimize dietary interventions in chronic pain management and differences across pain diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1572761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174411/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572761\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572761","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在过去的几十年里,饮食干预已经成为慢性疼痛的一种管理工具。某些饮食,如无麸质饮食,被患者认为特别有益,尽管没有证据支持这一点。研究这一主题的研究很少关注可能涉及症状发展或疼痛增加的预期效应。方法:在2×2研究设计中,我们对26例纤维肌痛(FMS)患者进行了重复测量以测试治疗效果。其他慢性疼痛情况也被纳入并进行探索性分析。然而,主要的分析集中在纤维肌痛患者。参与者接受了双盲谷蛋白或所谓谷蛋白(假谷蛋白)的口服食物挑战(OFC)。所有人都接受了一个OLP,上面有不同的指示来治疗粥的负面影响。治疗预期由中性或积极的olp指示调节。参与者被随机分为四组:(1)麸质和中性指令;(2)面筋和正面说明;(3)假面筋和中性说明;(4)假谷蛋白和阳性说明。评估指导前(T0)和指导后(T0.1)的预期以及OFC前(T0)和OFC后(T1 30min, T2 30-180min, T3 240min)的疼痛和消化不良。结果:在FMS患者中,观察到与说明书的显著相互作用(p = 0.048)。积极指示导致疼痛减轻(T0-T2),而中性指示导致疼痛加重。然而,事后比较没有发现显著的组间差异。与面筋无交互作用(p = 0.65)。积极指导积极治疗的预期但错过意义略有增加(p = 0.06),而消极的预期减少所有参与者不管指令(p p = 0.15页)或指令(p = 0.8)对消化不良。结论:这项研究强调了疾病类型、安慰剂效应和对麸质刺激期间慢性疼痛状况的预期之间复杂的相互作用。虽然麸质本身对疼痛或消化不良没有显着影响,但积极的指导显着增强了感知的疼痛缓解。这些发现表明,预期效应,而不是麸质,可能在症状调节中发挥更重要的作用,至少对疼痛来说是这样。未来的研究应侧重于期望驱动机制,以更好地理解和优化饮食干预在慢性疼痛管理和疼痛疾病之间的差异。
Open-Label-Placebos can reduce pain, but not indigestion during gluten challenge in chronic pain patients.
Background: Dietary interventions have become a management tool for chronic pain conditions over the past few decades. Certain diets, such as gluten-free diets, are perceived as particularly beneficial by patients, although there is no evidence to support this. Studies that have investigated this topic have focused little on possible expectation effects that could be involved in symptom development or pain increase.
Methods: In a 2×2 study design with repeated measurements to test treatment effects, we investigated 26 patients with fibromyalgia (FMS). Additional chronic pain conditions were included and analyzed exploratively. However, the main analysis focused on fibromyalgia patients. Participants underwent an oral food challenge (OFC) with double-blinded gluten or alleged gluten (sham gluten). All of them received an OLP with different instructions to treat negative effects of the porridge. Treatment expectations were modulated by either neutral or positive instructions regarding the OLPs. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups: (1) gluten and neutral instructions; (2) gluten and positive instructions; (3) sham gluten and neutral instructions; and (4) sham gluten and positive instructions. Expectations before (T0) and after the instructions (T0.1) as well as pain and indigestion before (T0) and after the OFC (T1 30min, T2 30-180min, T3 240min) were assessed.
Results: In FMS patients, a significant interaction with instructions were observed (p = 0.048). Positive instructions led to a decrease in pain (T0-T2) while neutral instructions led to an increase in pain. However, post-hoc comparisons did not reveal significant group differences. No interaction was found with gluten (p = 0.65). Positive instructions increased positive treatment expectations but missed significance marginally (p = 0.06), while negative expectations decreased for all participants regardless of instructions (p < 0.001). A strong correlation was found between expected and actual pain relief (p < 0.001). Digestive discomfort increased temporarily post-intervention (p < 0.004) but returned to baseline after 4 h. No significant effects of gluten (p = 0.15) or instructions (p = 0.8) on indigestion were observed.
Conclusion: This study highlights the complex interplay of disease type, placebo effects, and expectations in chronic pain conditions during gluten provocation. While gluten itself showed no significant impact on pain or indigestion, positive instructions significantly enhanced perceived pain relief. These findings suggest that expectation effects, rather than gluten, may play a more central role in symptom modulation, at least for pain. Future research should focus on expectation-driven mechanisms to better understand and optimize dietary interventions in chronic pain management and differences across pain diseases.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.