外派压力源与陪伴伴侣的幸福感:一种共性分析方法。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-06-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1607178
Katja Herrmann Aegerter, Andrea H Meyer, Jens Gaab, Yoon Phaik Ooi
{"title":"外派压力源与陪伴伴侣的幸福感:一种共性分析方法。","authors":"Katja Herrmann Aegerter, Andrea H Meyer, Jens Gaab, Yoon Phaik Ooi","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1607178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This cross-sectional study aims to explore the unique and shared effects of non-work expatriation stressors on the well-being of expatriate partners and spouses who relocate on a regular basis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 207 internationally mobile adults was recruited through international associations, foreign ministries, social media, and personal networks. Participants completed a quantitative online questionnaire that assessed various psychological factors. We employed commonality analysis to evaluate the unique and joint impact of perceived stress, perceived social support, isolation, and perceived cultural distance on partner well-being, using validated psychological scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perceived stress proved to be the most impactful unique contributor to partner well-being, while isolation emerged as the second strongest unique predictor. Perceived social support showed the most substantial combined effect with stress and isolation. The variance explained by perceived cultural distance was marginal, suggesting that stress and isolation are more influential factors in this population. The control variables (age, gender, duration of residence in the host country, and frequency of relocation) showed no significant contribution in combination with the stressors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Building on the findings of existing research, these results provide further support for the need for tailored interventions to promote the well-being of expatriate partners. Practical implications include involving partners in pre-assignment screening processes, investing in structured social support systems to reduce isolation, and developing comprehensive, culturally sensitive policies that address the range of challenges faced by expatriate partners.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1607178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expatriation stressors and the well-being of accompanying partners: a commonality analysis approach.\",\"authors\":\"Katja Herrmann Aegerter, Andrea H Meyer, Jens Gaab, Yoon Phaik Ooi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1607178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This cross-sectional study aims to explore the unique and shared effects of non-work expatriation stressors on the well-being of expatriate partners and spouses who relocate on a regular basis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 207 internationally mobile adults was recruited through international associations, foreign ministries, social media, and personal networks. Participants completed a quantitative online questionnaire that assessed various psychological factors. We employed commonality analysis to evaluate the unique and joint impact of perceived stress, perceived social support, isolation, and perceived cultural distance on partner well-being, using validated psychological scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perceived stress proved to be the most impactful unique contributor to partner well-being, while isolation emerged as the second strongest unique predictor. Perceived social support showed the most substantial combined effect with stress and isolation. The variance explained by perceived cultural distance was marginal, suggesting that stress and isolation are more influential factors in this population. The control variables (age, gender, duration of residence in the host country, and frequency of relocation) showed no significant contribution in combination with the stressors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Building on the findings of existing research, these results provide further support for the need for tailored interventions to promote the well-being of expatriate partners. Practical implications include involving partners in pre-assignment screening processes, investing in structured social support systems to reduce isolation, and developing comprehensive, culturally sensitive policies that address the range of challenges faced by expatriate partners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1607178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174445/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1607178\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1607178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本横断面研究旨在探讨非工作外派压力源对定期搬迁的外派伴侣和配偶幸福感的独特和共同影响。方法:通过国际协会、外交部、社交媒体和个人网络招募了207名国际流动成年人。参与者完成了一份定量的在线问卷,评估了各种心理因素。我们采用共性分析来评估感知压力、感知社会支持、孤独感和感知文化距离对伴侣幸福感的独特和共同影响。结果:感知到的压力被证明是对伴侣幸福影响最大的独特因素,而孤立是第二强大的独特预测因素。感知到的社会支持对压力和孤立的综合影响最为显著。由感知到的文化距离解释的差异是微不足道的,这表明压力和孤立是这一人群中更有影响的因素。控制变量(年龄、性别、在东道国居住的时间和搬迁的频率)与压力因素结合在一起没有显著的贡献。讨论:在现有研究结果的基础上,这些结果进一步支持需要有针对性的干预措施,以促进外籍伙伴的福祉。实际影响包括让合作伙伴参与任务前筛选过程,投资于结构化的社会支持系统以减少孤立,以及制定全面的、文化敏感的政策,以解决外派合作伙伴面临的一系列挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expatriation stressors and the well-being of accompanying partners: a commonality analysis approach.

Introduction: This cross-sectional study aims to explore the unique and shared effects of non-work expatriation stressors on the well-being of expatriate partners and spouses who relocate on a regular basis.

Methods: A cohort of 207 internationally mobile adults was recruited through international associations, foreign ministries, social media, and personal networks. Participants completed a quantitative online questionnaire that assessed various psychological factors. We employed commonality analysis to evaluate the unique and joint impact of perceived stress, perceived social support, isolation, and perceived cultural distance on partner well-being, using validated psychological scales.

Results: Perceived stress proved to be the most impactful unique contributor to partner well-being, while isolation emerged as the second strongest unique predictor. Perceived social support showed the most substantial combined effect with stress and isolation. The variance explained by perceived cultural distance was marginal, suggesting that stress and isolation are more influential factors in this population. The control variables (age, gender, duration of residence in the host country, and frequency of relocation) showed no significant contribution in combination with the stressors.

Discussion: Building on the findings of existing research, these results provide further support for the need for tailored interventions to promote the well-being of expatriate partners. Practical implications include involving partners in pre-assignment screening processes, investing in structured social support systems to reduce isolation, and developing comprehensive, culturally sensitive policies that address the range of challenges faced by expatriate partners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信