B型急性主动脉综合征胸2区血管内主动脉修复术中左锁骨下动脉血运重建的血管内技术比较:一项回顾性队列研究

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1566798
Zizhong Zhang, Guangkun Sun, Jiacheng Ye, Bin Liu, Yongzheng Wang, Yuliang Li, Haiyang Chang
{"title":"B型急性主动脉综合征胸2区血管内主动脉修复术中左锁骨下动脉血运重建的血管内技术比较:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Zizhong Zhang, Guangkun Sun, Jiacheng Ye, Bin Liu, Yongzheng Wang, Yuliang Li, Haiyang Chang","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1566798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Castor-branched stent-graft, chimney stent, and fenestration techniques have been employed for left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization during zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), but not recommended routinely. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of these techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From February 2017 to June 2020, 133 patients with type B acute aortic syndromes undergoing LSA revascularization during zone 2 TEVAR were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcomes include technical success, mortality, stroke and spinal cord ischemia. The secondary outcomes include aortic remodeling, LSA patency, freedom from aorta-related reintervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients were treated with the Castor-branched stent-graft (Group A), 42 with the chimney technique (Group B), and 41 with the fenestration technique (Group C). The groups demonstrated a similar technical success rate, with 96% in Group A, 97.62% in Group B, and 95.12% in Group C. Despite a more predominant bird-beak configuration in group A (<i>p</i> = 0.003), no significant difference was observed in perioperative complications. Two TEVAR-related deaths occurred in Groups B and C, while none was reported in Group A. During the first two years of follow-up, favorable aortic remodeling was confirmed in all groups. Each group exhibited two cases of LSA occlusions. Aorta-related reintervention and mortality did not significantly differ among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endovascular techniques are feasible for LSA revascularization during zone 2 TEVAR, with favorable aortic remodeling. However, the durability of these procedures requires careful evaluation, given the potential concern of LSA occlusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1566798"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing endovascular techniques for left subclavian artery revascularization during zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B acute aortic syndromes: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Zizhong Zhang, Guangkun Sun, Jiacheng Ye, Bin Liu, Yongzheng Wang, Yuliang Li, Haiyang Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1566798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Castor-branched stent-graft, chimney stent, and fenestration techniques have been employed for left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization during zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), but not recommended routinely. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of these techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From February 2017 to June 2020, 133 patients with type B acute aortic syndromes undergoing LSA revascularization during zone 2 TEVAR were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcomes include technical success, mortality, stroke and spinal cord ischemia. The secondary outcomes include aortic remodeling, LSA patency, freedom from aorta-related reintervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients were treated with the Castor-branched stent-graft (Group A), 42 with the chimney technique (Group B), and 41 with the fenestration technique (Group C). The groups demonstrated a similar technical success rate, with 96% in Group A, 97.62% in Group B, and 95.12% in Group C. Despite a more predominant bird-beak configuration in group A (<i>p</i> = 0.003), no significant difference was observed in perioperative complications. Two TEVAR-related deaths occurred in Groups B and C, while none was reported in Group A. During the first two years of follow-up, favorable aortic remodeling was confirmed in all groups. Each group exhibited two cases of LSA occlusions. Aorta-related reintervention and mortality did not significantly differ among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endovascular techniques are feasible for LSA revascularization during zone 2 TEVAR, with favorable aortic remodeling. However, the durability of these procedures requires careful evaluation, given the potential concern of LSA occlusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1566798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174081/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1566798\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1566798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:蓖麻支支架移植、烟囱支架和开窗技术已被用于胸椎2区血管内主动脉修复(TEVAR)期间的左锁骨下动脉(LSA)血运重建术,但不被常规推荐。本研究旨在比较这些技术的安全性和有效性。方法:从2017年2月至2020年6月,回顾性纳入133例在TEVAR 2区进行LSA血运重建的B型急性主动脉综合征患者。主要结局包括技术成功、死亡率、中风和脊髓缺血。次要结果包括主动脉重塑、LSA通畅、免于主动脉相关的再干预。结果:50例患者采用蓖麻支支架(A组),42例采用烟囱技术(B组),41例采用开窗技术(C组)。两组手术成功率相似,a组为96%,B组为97.62%,c组为95.12%。尽管a组以鸟喙形为主(p = 0.003),但两组围手术期并发症无显著差异。B组和C组有2例tevar相关死亡,而a组无一例。在前两年的随访中,所有组均证实主动脉重构良好。每组出现2例LSA闭塞。主动脉相关再干预和死亡率组间无显著差异。结论:血管内技术对2区TEVAR期间的LSA血运重建是可行的,有利于主动脉重塑。然而,考虑到潜在的LSA闭塞问题,这些手术的持久性需要仔细评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing endovascular techniques for left subclavian artery revascularization during zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B acute aortic syndromes: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Castor-branched stent-graft, chimney stent, and fenestration techniques have been employed for left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization during zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), but not recommended routinely. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of these techniques.

Methods: From February 2017 to June 2020, 133 patients with type B acute aortic syndromes undergoing LSA revascularization during zone 2 TEVAR were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcomes include technical success, mortality, stroke and spinal cord ischemia. The secondary outcomes include aortic remodeling, LSA patency, freedom from aorta-related reintervention.

Results: Fifty patients were treated with the Castor-branched stent-graft (Group A), 42 with the chimney technique (Group B), and 41 with the fenestration technique (Group C). The groups demonstrated a similar technical success rate, with 96% in Group A, 97.62% in Group B, and 95.12% in Group C. Despite a more predominant bird-beak configuration in group A (p = 0.003), no significant difference was observed in perioperative complications. Two TEVAR-related deaths occurred in Groups B and C, while none was reported in Group A. During the first two years of follow-up, favorable aortic remodeling was confirmed in all groups. Each group exhibited two cases of LSA occlusions. Aorta-related reintervention and mortality did not significantly differ among the groups.

Conclusion: Endovascular techniques are feasible for LSA revascularization during zone 2 TEVAR, with favorable aortic remodeling. However, the durability of these procedures requires careful evaluation, given the potential concern of LSA occlusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信