[德文版护理依赖问卷的心理测量验证]。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sebastian Schwab, Naline Geurtzen, Eva Fassbinder, Sarah Glanert, Anja Schaich, Nele Assmann, Svenja Sürig, Stefan Borgwardt, Jan Philipp Klein
{"title":"[德文版护理依赖问卷的心理测量验证]。","authors":"Sebastian Schwab, Naline Geurtzen, Eva Fassbinder, Sarah Glanert, Anja Schaich, Nele Assmann, Svenja Sürig, Stefan Borgwardt, Jan Philipp Klein","doi":"10.1055/a-2600-3682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychometric validation of the German version of the CDQ to measure patients' perceived care dependency on their psychotherapists (CD).Using data from 5 prospective observational studies, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). We examined the psychometric properties of the CDQ and its correlations with other clinically relevant variables.Our EFA (n=376) revealed a factorial structure that differs from the initial version. Therefore, we propose the CDQ-R12 with 3 subscales of 4 items each. The CDQ-R12 is reliable (α.= 0.917), correlated positively with self-rated CD (r=0.242), symptom severity (r=0.481 and 0.395), therapeutic alliance (r=0.380) and interpersonal problems (r =0 .338), while it was negatively associated with social support (r=- 0.243) (p<0.01 each). Patients with borderline personality disorder showed a higher CDQ-R12 score than those with depressive disorder (r=0.13, p=0.013).The CDQ-R12 is suitable for investigating the influence of CD on the success of psychotherapy. Our study is of a pilot nature and the results need to be verified by further studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12353,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Psychometric Validation of the German Version of the Care Dependency Questionnaire].\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Schwab, Naline Geurtzen, Eva Fassbinder, Sarah Glanert, Anja Schaich, Nele Assmann, Svenja Sürig, Stefan Borgwardt, Jan Philipp Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2600-3682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Psychometric validation of the German version of the CDQ to measure patients' perceived care dependency on their psychotherapists (CD).Using data from 5 prospective observational studies, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). We examined the psychometric properties of the CDQ and its correlations with other clinically relevant variables.Our EFA (n=376) revealed a factorial structure that differs from the initial version. Therefore, we propose the CDQ-R12 with 3 subscales of 4 items each. The CDQ-R12 is reliable (α.= 0.917), correlated positively with self-rated CD (r=0.242), symptom severity (r=0.481 and 0.395), therapeutic alliance (r=0.380) and interpersonal problems (r =0 .338), while it was negatively associated with social support (r=- 0.243) (p<0.01 each). Patients with borderline personality disorder showed a higher CDQ-R12 score than those with depressive disorder (r=0.13, p=0.013).The CDQ-R12 is suitable for investigating the influence of CD on the success of psychotherapy. Our study is of a pilot nature and the results need to be verified by further studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2600-3682\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2600-3682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德国版CDQ量表测量患者对心理治疗师护理依赖的心理计量学验证。利用5项前瞻性观察性研究的数据,我们进行了探索性因素分析(EFA)。我们检查了CDQ的心理测量特性及其与其他临床相关变量的相关性。我们的EFA (n=376)揭示了与初始版本不同的析因结构。因此,我们提出了CDQ-R12量表,它有3个子量表,每个子量表4个条目。CDQ-R12是可靠的。与自评CD (r=0.242)、症状严重程度(r=0.481、0.395)、治疗联盟(r=0.380)、人际关系问题(r= 0.338)呈正相关,与社会支持(r=- 0.243)呈负相关(p = 0.917)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Psychometric Validation of the German Version of the Care Dependency Questionnaire].

Psychometric validation of the German version of the CDQ to measure patients' perceived care dependency on their psychotherapists (CD).Using data from 5 prospective observational studies, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). We examined the psychometric properties of the CDQ and its correlations with other clinically relevant variables.Our EFA (n=376) revealed a factorial structure that differs from the initial version. Therefore, we propose the CDQ-R12 with 3 subscales of 4 items each. The CDQ-R12 is reliable (α.= 0.917), correlated positively with self-rated CD (r=0.242), symptom severity (r=0.481 and 0.395), therapeutic alliance (r=0.380) and interpersonal problems (r =0 .338), while it was negatively associated with social support (r=- 0.243) (p<0.01 each). Patients with borderline personality disorder showed a higher CDQ-R12 score than those with depressive disorder (r=0.13, p=0.013).The CDQ-R12 is suitable for investigating the influence of CD on the success of psychotherapy. Our study is of a pilot nature and the results need to be verified by further studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
139
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Fundiertes Wissen für den Berufsalltag Relevante Originalarbeiten Informative Übersichten zu wichtigen Themen Fortbildungsteil mit Zertifizierung – 36 CME-Punkte pro Jahr Interessante Kasuistiken Referiert & kommentiert: Internationale Studien Aktuelles zu Begutachtung und Neurobiologie International gelistet und häufig zitiert
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信