紫杉醇联合贝伐单抗腹腔内滴注治疗常见胃肠道恶性腹膜积液的疗效分析及预后指标筛选

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yucong Li, Xuguang Mi, Xiaonan Li, Xiao-Nan Li, Ying Yang, Ying Zhou, Xianzhuo Jiang, Yingying Yu, Zhiqiang Ni, JunZi Zhang, Xiuying Lin, Yanqiu Fang, Junjie Hou
{"title":"紫杉醇联合贝伐单抗腹腔内滴注治疗常见胃肠道恶性腹膜积液的疗效分析及预后指标筛选","authors":"Yucong Li, Xuguang Mi, Xiaonan Li, Xiao-Nan Li, Ying Yang, Ying Zhou, Xianzhuo Jiang, Yingying Yu, Zhiqiang Ni, JunZi Zhang, Xiuying Lin, Yanqiu Fang, Junjie Hou","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2522251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigates the efficacy of paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of malignant gastrointestinal tumors with malignant ascites and screens for biomarkers that predict efficacy.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling 92 eligible patients who received either paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab or paclitaxel monotherapy. Efficacy was assessed, and biomarkers predictive of treatment efficacy were screened using indicators such as disease control rate, objective response rate, LA, LDH, and CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The disease control rate (91.18%) and objective response rate (61.76%) in both the treatment group and the control group were significantly better than those in the control group. In the treatment group, non-PD group, and remission group, LA and LDH levels decreased significantly with increasing number of treatments, while the CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> ratio increased significantly. There was no significant difference between the control group and the non-relief group after treatment. The trend of changes after PD treatment was opposite to that mentioned above. There was no statistically significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the combination of paclitaxel and bevacizumab is more effective and that LA, LDH, and CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> can predict treatment efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the efficacy of paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab intraperitoneal instillation in common gastrointestinal malignant peritoneal effusions and screening of prognostic indicators.\",\"authors\":\"Yucong Li, Xuguang Mi, Xiaonan Li, Xiao-Nan Li, Ying Yang, Ying Zhou, Xianzhuo Jiang, Yingying Yu, Zhiqiang Ni, JunZi Zhang, Xiuying Lin, Yanqiu Fang, Junjie Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737140.2025.2522251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigates the efficacy of paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of malignant gastrointestinal tumors with malignant ascites and screens for biomarkers that predict efficacy.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling 92 eligible patients who received either paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab or paclitaxel monotherapy. Efficacy was assessed, and biomarkers predictive of treatment efficacy were screened using indicators such as disease control rate, objective response rate, LA, LDH, and CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The disease control rate (91.18%) and objective response rate (61.76%) in both the treatment group and the control group were significantly better than those in the control group. In the treatment group, non-PD group, and remission group, LA and LDH levels decreased significantly with increasing number of treatments, while the CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> ratio increased significantly. There was no significant difference between the control group and the non-relief group after treatment. The trend of changes after PD treatment was opposite to that mentioned above. There was no statistically significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the combination of paclitaxel and bevacizumab is more effective and that LA, LDH, and CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> can predict treatment efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2522251\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2522251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究探讨紫杉醇联合贝伐单抗治疗伴有恶性腹水的胃肠道恶性肿瘤的疗效,并筛选预测疗效的生物标志物。研究设计和方法:进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入92例接受紫杉醇联合贝伐单抗或紫杉醇单药治疗的符合条件的患者。评估疗效,并通过疾病控制率、客观缓解率、LA、LDH、CD4+/CD8+比值等指标筛选预测治疗疗效的生物标志物。结果:治疗组和对照组的疾病控制率(91.18%)和客观有效率(61.76%)均显著优于对照组。在治疗组、非pd组和缓解组中,LA和LDH水平随治疗次数的增加而显著降低,CD4+/CD8+比值显著升高。治疗后对照组与非缓解组无显著性差异。PD治疗后的变化趋势与上述相反。两组不良反应发生率无统计学差异。结论:本研究表明紫杉醇联合贝伐单抗更有效,且LA、LDH、CD4+/CD8+可预测治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the efficacy of paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab intraperitoneal instillation in common gastrointestinal malignant peritoneal effusions and screening of prognostic indicators.

Background: This study investigates the efficacy of paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of malignant gastrointestinal tumors with malignant ascites and screens for biomarkers that predict efficacy.

Research design and methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling 92 eligible patients who received either paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab or paclitaxel monotherapy. Efficacy was assessed, and biomarkers predictive of treatment efficacy were screened using indicators such as disease control rate, objective response rate, LA, LDH, and CD4+/CD8+ ratios.

Results: The disease control rate (91.18%) and objective response rate (61.76%) in both the treatment group and the control group were significantly better than those in the control group. In the treatment group, non-PD group, and remission group, LA and LDH levels decreased significantly with increasing number of treatments, while the CD4+/CD8+ ratio increased significantly. There was no significant difference between the control group and the non-relief group after treatment. The trend of changes after PD treatment was opposite to that mentioned above. There was no statistically significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the combination of paclitaxel and bevacizumab is more effective and that LA, LDH, and CD4+/CD8+ can predict treatment efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信