内镜逆行胰胆管造影排出工具联合快速胰蛋白酶原-2检测预测当日排出:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Christina J Sperna Weiland, Megan M L Engels, Robbert C H Scheffer, Bas Van Balkom, Koen van Hee, Bertram J T Haarhuis, Joost P H Drenth, Jeanin E van Hooft, Peter D Siersema, Erwin J M van Geenen
{"title":"内镜逆行胰胆管造影排出工具联合快速胰蛋白酶原-2检测预测当日排出:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Christina J Sperna Weiland, Megan M L Engels, Robbert C H Scheffer, Bas Van Balkom, Koen van Hee, Bertram J T Haarhuis, Joost P H Drenth, Jeanin E van Hooft, Peter D Siersema, Erwin J M van Geenen","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000003014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Identifying patients at high-risk for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related adverse events (AEs) is important for postendoscopic discharge management. This study assesses two strategies, a urinary trypsinogen-2 (UT-2) dipstick combined with a risk-factor-based ERCP discharge tool, for identifying patients at increased risk of developing AEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August 2018 and March 2021, 268 patients were enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the UT-2 dipstick, the discharge tool, and combined strategies were assessed for predicting ERCP-related AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four (10.5%) AEs occurred in the eligible 228 patients, of which 14 (6.1%) were post-ERCP pancreatitis. The discharge tool and UT-2 dipstick combination outperformed the individual strategies for all AEs with a sensitivity of 66.7% (95% CI, 44.7-84.4%), specificity of 78.5% (95% CI, 72.2-83.9%), PPV of 26.6% (95% CI, 19.8-34.8%) and NPV of 95.3% (95% CI, 91.9-97.3%). For post-ERCP pancreatitis alone, the strategies combined had a sensitivity of 64.3% (95% CI, 35.1-87.2%), specificity of 76.2% (95% CI, 69.9-81.7%), PPV of 14.9% (95% CI, 10.0-21.7%) and NPV of 97.0% (95% CI, 94.2-98.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the combination of UT-2 dipstick and discharge tool outperforms the two strategies separately in predicting post-ERCP AEs, we would not recommend implementation of either strategy given the low sensitivity when applied separately or combined.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"1206-1212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography discharge tool combined with rapid trypsinogen-2 test to predict same-day discharge: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Christina J Sperna Weiland, Megan M L Engels, Robbert C H Scheffer, Bas Van Balkom, Koen van Hee, Bertram J T Haarhuis, Joost P H Drenth, Jeanin E van Hooft, Peter D Siersema, Erwin J M van Geenen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MEG.0000000000003014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Identifying patients at high-risk for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related adverse events (AEs) is important for postendoscopic discharge management. This study assesses two strategies, a urinary trypsinogen-2 (UT-2) dipstick combined with a risk-factor-based ERCP discharge tool, for identifying patients at increased risk of developing AEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August 2018 and March 2021, 268 patients were enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the UT-2 dipstick, the discharge tool, and combined strategies were assessed for predicting ERCP-related AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four (10.5%) AEs occurred in the eligible 228 patients, of which 14 (6.1%) were post-ERCP pancreatitis. The discharge tool and UT-2 dipstick combination outperformed the individual strategies for all AEs with a sensitivity of 66.7% (95% CI, 44.7-84.4%), specificity of 78.5% (95% CI, 72.2-83.9%), PPV of 26.6% (95% CI, 19.8-34.8%) and NPV of 95.3% (95% CI, 91.9-97.3%). For post-ERCP pancreatitis alone, the strategies combined had a sensitivity of 64.3% (95% CI, 35.1-87.2%), specificity of 76.2% (95% CI, 69.9-81.7%), PPV of 14.9% (95% CI, 10.0-21.7%) and NPV of 97.0% (95% CI, 94.2-98.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the combination of UT-2 dipstick and discharge tool outperforms the two strategies separately in predicting post-ERCP AEs, we would not recommend implementation of either strategy given the low sensitivity when applied separately or combined.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1206-1212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462681/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000003014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000003014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)相关不良事件(ae)高危患者对内镜后出院管理具有重要意义。本研究评估了两种策略,尿胰蛋白酶原-2 (UT-2)测试棒结合基于风险因素的ERCP出院工具,用于识别发生ae风险增加的患者。方法:在2018年8月至2021年3月期间,268名患者入组了一个多中心前瞻性队列。评估UT-2试纸、出院工具和联合策略预测ercp相关ae的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。结果:符合条件的228例患者中发生24例(10.5%)不良事件,其中14例(6.1%)为ercp后胰腺炎。放液工具和UT-2量尺组合治疗所有ae的敏感性为66.7% (95% CI, 44.7-84.4%),特异性为78.5% (95% CI, 72.2-83.9%), PPV为26.6% (95% CI, 19.8-34.8%), NPV为95.3% (95% CI, 91.9-97.3%)。对于单独的ercp后胰腺炎,联合策略的敏感性为64.3% (95% CI, 35.1-87.2%),特异性为76.2% (95% CI, 66.9 -81.7%), PPV为14.9% (95% CI, 10.0-21.7%), NPV为97.0% (95% CI, 94.2-98.5%)。结论:尽管UT-2试纸和放电工具联合使用在预测ercp后ae方面优于单独使用这两种策略,但考虑到单独使用或联合使用时灵敏度较低,我们不建议使用任何一种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography discharge tool combined with rapid trypsinogen-2 test to predict same-day discharge: a prospective cohort study.

Objectives: Identifying patients at high-risk for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related adverse events (AEs) is important for postendoscopic discharge management. This study assesses two strategies, a urinary trypsinogen-2 (UT-2) dipstick combined with a risk-factor-based ERCP discharge tool, for identifying patients at increased risk of developing AEs.

Methods: Between August 2018 and March 2021, 268 patients were enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the UT-2 dipstick, the discharge tool, and combined strategies were assessed for predicting ERCP-related AEs.

Results: Twenty-four (10.5%) AEs occurred in the eligible 228 patients, of which 14 (6.1%) were post-ERCP pancreatitis. The discharge tool and UT-2 dipstick combination outperformed the individual strategies for all AEs with a sensitivity of 66.7% (95% CI, 44.7-84.4%), specificity of 78.5% (95% CI, 72.2-83.9%), PPV of 26.6% (95% CI, 19.8-34.8%) and NPV of 95.3% (95% CI, 91.9-97.3%). For post-ERCP pancreatitis alone, the strategies combined had a sensitivity of 64.3% (95% CI, 35.1-87.2%), specificity of 76.2% (95% CI, 69.9-81.7%), PPV of 14.9% (95% CI, 10.0-21.7%) and NPV of 97.0% (95% CI, 94.2-98.5%).

Conclusion: Although the combination of UT-2 dipstick and discharge tool outperforms the two strategies separately in predicting post-ERCP AEs, we would not recommend implementation of either strategy given the low sensitivity when applied separately or combined.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信