全球儿童肺炎的诊断检测和抗生素管理:当前发展和下一步。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Josephine S van de Maat, Andrew Redfern, Tigist Bacha, Jeroen Schouten, Esmée Ruizendaal
{"title":"全球儿童肺炎的诊断检测和抗生素管理:当前发展和下一步。","authors":"Josephine S van de Maat, Andrew Redfern, Tigist Bacha, Jeroen Schouten, Esmée Ruizendaal","doi":"10.1097/MOP.0000000000001484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Routine diagnostic tests for childhood pneumonia lack the accuracy to identify bacterial pneumonia, leading to inappropriate antibiotic prescription. Novel tests are being developed. Optimizing diagnostic strategies using available diagnostic tools and exploring the role of new tests is essential to improve antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in children. This review provides an overview of advances in diagnostic testing for pediatric pneumonia and discusses how strategies can be optimized in different settings in order to improve AMS.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>All currently available tests for bacterial pneumonia are limited in their diagnostic accuracy. However, in settings with high baseline antibiotic prescription, routine diagnostics such as CRP or PCT-guided prescription can improve antibiotic use. Among the innovative tests, lung ultrasound with computer-aided detection and prediction models combining multiple tests holds most promise for low-resource settings. For high-resource settings, RNA signatures and next-generation sequencing are promising developments. The impact of innovative tests on AMS remains to be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Robust diagnostic and contextual research is needed to develop new diagnostic tests and to optimize current strategies for bacterial pneumonia in children. In order to tailor diagnostic approaches to specific settings, broad impact studies and stratification of risk groups are crucial.</p>","PeriodicalId":10985,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic testing and antibiotic stewardship for pneumonia in children worldwide: current developments and next steps.\",\"authors\":\"Josephine S van de Maat, Andrew Redfern, Tigist Bacha, Jeroen Schouten, Esmée Ruizendaal\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOP.0000000000001484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Routine diagnostic tests for childhood pneumonia lack the accuracy to identify bacterial pneumonia, leading to inappropriate antibiotic prescription. Novel tests are being developed. Optimizing diagnostic strategies using available diagnostic tools and exploring the role of new tests is essential to improve antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in children. This review provides an overview of advances in diagnostic testing for pediatric pneumonia and discusses how strategies can be optimized in different settings in order to improve AMS.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>All currently available tests for bacterial pneumonia are limited in their diagnostic accuracy. However, in settings with high baseline antibiotic prescription, routine diagnostics such as CRP or PCT-guided prescription can improve antibiotic use. Among the innovative tests, lung ultrasound with computer-aided detection and prediction models combining multiple tests holds most promise for low-resource settings. For high-resource settings, RNA signatures and next-generation sequencing are promising developments. The impact of innovative tests on AMS remains to be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Robust diagnostic and contextual research is needed to develop new diagnostic tests and to optimize current strategies for bacterial pneumonia in children. In order to tailor diagnostic approaches to specific settings, broad impact studies and stratification of risk groups are crucial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000001484\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000001484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:儿童肺炎常规诊断检测对细菌性肺炎识别的准确性不足,导致抗生素处方不当。人们正在开发新的测试方法。利用现有诊断工具优化诊断策略并探索新检测方法的作用,对于改善儿童抗微生物药物管理(AMS)至关重要。本文综述了儿童肺炎诊断检测的进展,并讨论了如何在不同情况下优化策略以改善AMS。最近发现:目前所有可用的细菌性肺炎检测方法的诊断准确性都有限。然而,在高基线抗生素处方的环境中,常规诊断,如CRP或pct指导下的处方可以改善抗生素的使用。在创新的测试中,肺超声与计算机辅助检测和预测模型结合多种测试在低资源环境中最有希望。对于高资源环境,RNA标记和下一代测序是有前途的发展。创新测试对AMS的影响仍有待评估。总结:需要进行强有力的诊断和背景研究,以开发新的诊断测试并优化目前针对儿童细菌性肺炎的策略。为了使诊断方法适应具体情况,广泛的影响研究和危险群体分层是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic testing and antibiotic stewardship for pneumonia in children worldwide: current developments and next steps.

Purpose of review: Routine diagnostic tests for childhood pneumonia lack the accuracy to identify bacterial pneumonia, leading to inappropriate antibiotic prescription. Novel tests are being developed. Optimizing diagnostic strategies using available diagnostic tools and exploring the role of new tests is essential to improve antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in children. This review provides an overview of advances in diagnostic testing for pediatric pneumonia and discusses how strategies can be optimized in different settings in order to improve AMS.

Recent findings: All currently available tests for bacterial pneumonia are limited in their diagnostic accuracy. However, in settings with high baseline antibiotic prescription, routine diagnostics such as CRP or PCT-guided prescription can improve antibiotic use. Among the innovative tests, lung ultrasound with computer-aided detection and prediction models combining multiple tests holds most promise for low-resource settings. For high-resource settings, RNA signatures and next-generation sequencing are promising developments. The impact of innovative tests on AMS remains to be evaluated.

Summary: Robust diagnostic and contextual research is needed to develop new diagnostic tests and to optimize current strategies for bacterial pneumonia in children. In order to tailor diagnostic approaches to specific settings, broad impact studies and stratification of risk groups are crucial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
184
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Current Opinion in Pediatrics is a reader-friendly resource which allows the reader to keep up-to-date with the most important advances in the pediatric field. Each issue of Current Opinion in Pediatrics contains three main sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive cover of all key issues related to pediatrics; including genetics, therapeutics and toxicology, adolescent medicine, neonatology and perinatology, and orthopedics. Unique to Current Opinion in Pediatrics is the office pediatrics section which appears in every issue and covers popular topics such as fever, immunization and ADHD. Current Opinion in Pediatrics is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信