利用全人群数字接触者追踪来估计大流行背景下真实世界的疫苗有效性。

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Jeremy Wei Quan Chan, Liang En Wee, Muhammad Ismail Bin Abdul Malek, Calvin Chiew, Zheng Jie Marc Ho, Benjamin Ong, Derrick Heng, Vernon Lee, David Lye, Kelvin Bryan Tan
{"title":"利用全人群数字接触者追踪来估计大流行背景下真实世界的疫苗有效性。","authors":"Jeremy Wei Quan Chan, Liang En Wee, Muhammad Ismail Bin Abdul Malek, Calvin Chiew, Zheng Jie Marc Ho, Benjamin Ong, Derrick Heng, Vernon Lee, David Lye, Kelvin Bryan Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.06.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Observational cohort methods for evaluating real-world vaccine effectiveness can introduce biases and yield negative vaccine-effectiveness estimates. We evaluated if utilization of digital contact tracing (DCT) data could yield more realistic estimates of vaccine effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection was estimated using an observational population-based cohort of older Singaporeans (≥60 years) and DCT data of contacts (≥60 years) significantly exposed to COVID-19 cases, during Delta/Omicron predominance. Person-day generalized Poisson regressions adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics were performed to estimate adjusted incidence rate ratios of infection at different time intervals from second/third vaccine doses up to 5 months post vaccination, with unvaccinated/partially vaccinated person-time as the reference group. Vaccine effectiveness against infection (VE-I) was calculated as 1 minus incidence rate ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 883 227 and 853 435 older Singaporeans were included in the observational cohort during Delta and Omicron predominance. Also, 102 208 and 347 817 case-contact pairs were identified from national DCT data during Delta and Omicron-predominant transmission. During Delta, estimates derived using the observational population-based cohort method mirrored DCT-based estimates (e.g. boosting, 60-69 years: VE-I = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.57-0.63 [observational cohort]; VE-I = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72-0.78) [DCT-based estimates]). However, during the Omicron surge, observational cohort methods yielded negative vaccine-effectiveness estimates (e.g. boosting <2 months post vaccination, 60-69 years: VE-I = -1.12, 95% CI: -1.29 to -0.96). When DCT data were utilized to estimate vaccine effectiveness, boosting restored protection (e.g. boosting <2 months post-vaccination, 60-69 years: VE-I = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.23-0.39), with subsequent waning 2-month post-booster (e.g. boosting >5 months post-vaccination, 60-69 years: VE-I = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.04-0.23).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>During an Omicron COVID-19 surge, observational cohort methods yielded negative vaccine-effectiveness estimates, whereas the use of national DCT data yielded more realistic estimates. DCT data can augment real-world estimates of vaccine effectiveness in the population at large and convey a more complete picture of vaccine-derived protection, especially in the context of a complex immunization landscape and an evolving pandemic situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of population-wide digital contact tracing to estimate real-world vaccine effectiveness in a pandemic setting.\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy Wei Quan Chan, Liang En Wee, Muhammad Ismail Bin Abdul Malek, Calvin Chiew, Zheng Jie Marc Ho, Benjamin Ong, Derrick Heng, Vernon Lee, David Lye, Kelvin Bryan Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.06.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Observational cohort methods for evaluating real-world vaccine effectiveness can introduce biases and yield negative vaccine-effectiveness estimates. We evaluated if utilization of digital contact tracing (DCT) data could yield more realistic estimates of vaccine effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection was estimated using an observational population-based cohort of older Singaporeans (≥60 years) and DCT data of contacts (≥60 years) significantly exposed to COVID-19 cases, during Delta/Omicron predominance. Person-day generalized Poisson regressions adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics were performed to estimate adjusted incidence rate ratios of infection at different time intervals from second/third vaccine doses up to 5 months post vaccination, with unvaccinated/partially vaccinated person-time as the reference group. Vaccine effectiveness against infection (VE-I) was calculated as 1 minus incidence rate ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 883 227 and 853 435 older Singaporeans were included in the observational cohort during Delta and Omicron predominance. Also, 102 208 and 347 817 case-contact pairs were identified from national DCT data during Delta and Omicron-predominant transmission. During Delta, estimates derived using the observational population-based cohort method mirrored DCT-based estimates (e.g. boosting, 60-69 years: VE-I = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.57-0.63 [observational cohort]; VE-I = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72-0.78) [DCT-based estimates]). However, during the Omicron surge, observational cohort methods yielded negative vaccine-effectiveness estimates (e.g. boosting <2 months post vaccination, 60-69 years: VE-I = -1.12, 95% CI: -1.29 to -0.96). When DCT data were utilized to estimate vaccine effectiveness, boosting restored protection (e.g. boosting <2 months post-vaccination, 60-69 years: VE-I = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.23-0.39), with subsequent waning 2-month post-booster (e.g. boosting >5 months post-vaccination, 60-69 years: VE-I = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.04-0.23).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>During an Omicron COVID-19 surge, observational cohort methods yielded negative vaccine-effectiveness estimates, whereas the use of national DCT data yielded more realistic estimates. DCT data can augment real-world estimates of vaccine effectiveness in the population at large and convey a more complete picture of vaccine-derived protection, especially in the context of a complex immunization landscape and an evolving pandemic situation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.06.014\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.06.014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:用于评估真实世界疫苗有效性的观察性队列方法可能引入偏差并产生负面的疫苗有效性估计。我们评估了数字接触追踪(DCT)数据的利用是否能够产生更现实的疫苗有效性估计。方法:使用基于观察性人群的新加坡老年人(≥60岁)队列和Delta/ omicron优势期间显著暴露于COVID-19病例的接触者(≥60岁)的DCT数据,估计疫苗对SARS-CoV-2感染的有效性。根据社会人口学特征进行调整后的人-日广义泊松回归,以未接种疫苗/部分接种疫苗的人-日为参照组,估计从接种第二次/第三次疫苗到接种后5个月的不同时间间隔内感染的调整发病率比(IRRs)。疫苗抗感染有效性(VE-I)计算为1- irr。结果:883,227和853,435名新加坡老年人在Delta和omicron优势期间被纳入观察队列。在以Delta和ommicron为主的传播期间,从国家DCT数据中确定了102,208和347,817对病例接触者。在Delta期间,使用基于观察人群的队列方法得出的估计值反映了基于dct的估计值(例如。促进,60-69岁:VE-I=0.60, 95%CI=0.57-0.63[观察队列];VE-I=0.76, 95%CI=0.72-0.78)[基于dct的估计]。然而,在Omicron激增期间,观察性队列方法产生了负面的疫苗有效性估计(例如。接种后5个月,60-69岁:VE-I=0.14, 95%CI=0.04-0.23)。结论:在Omicron COVID-19激增期间,观察性队列方法得出的疫苗有效性估计值为阴性,而使用国家DCT数据得出的估计值更现实。DCT数据可以增强对疫苗在广大人群中的有效性的实际估计,并传达疫苗衍生保护的更完整图景,特别是在复杂的免疫形势和不断演变的大流行形势下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilization of population-wide digital contact tracing to estimate real-world vaccine effectiveness in a pandemic setting.

Objectives: Observational cohort methods for evaluating real-world vaccine effectiveness can introduce biases and yield negative vaccine-effectiveness estimates. We evaluated if utilization of digital contact tracing (DCT) data could yield more realistic estimates of vaccine effectiveness.

Methods: Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection was estimated using an observational population-based cohort of older Singaporeans (≥60 years) and DCT data of contacts (≥60 years) significantly exposed to COVID-19 cases, during Delta/Omicron predominance. Person-day generalized Poisson regressions adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics were performed to estimate adjusted incidence rate ratios of infection at different time intervals from second/third vaccine doses up to 5 months post vaccination, with unvaccinated/partially vaccinated person-time as the reference group. Vaccine effectiveness against infection (VE-I) was calculated as 1 minus incidence rate ratio.

Results: In total, 883 227 and 853 435 older Singaporeans were included in the observational cohort during Delta and Omicron predominance. Also, 102 208 and 347 817 case-contact pairs were identified from national DCT data during Delta and Omicron-predominant transmission. During Delta, estimates derived using the observational population-based cohort method mirrored DCT-based estimates (e.g. boosting, 60-69 years: VE-I = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.57-0.63 [observational cohort]; VE-I = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72-0.78) [DCT-based estimates]). However, during the Omicron surge, observational cohort methods yielded negative vaccine-effectiveness estimates (e.g. boosting <2 months post vaccination, 60-69 years: VE-I = -1.12, 95% CI: -1.29 to -0.96). When DCT data were utilized to estimate vaccine effectiveness, boosting restored protection (e.g. boosting <2 months post-vaccination, 60-69 years: VE-I = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.23-0.39), with subsequent waning 2-month post-booster (e.g. boosting >5 months post-vaccination, 60-69 years: VE-I = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.04-0.23).

Discussion: During an Omicron COVID-19 surge, observational cohort methods yielded negative vaccine-effectiveness estimates, whereas the use of national DCT data yielded more realistic estimates. DCT data can augment real-world estimates of vaccine effectiveness in the population at large and convey a more complete picture of vaccine-derived protection, especially in the context of a complex immunization landscape and an evolving pandemic situation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信