自由禁食对无痛胃镜检查患者胃液量的影响:一项随机对照研究

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-05-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/LLMS3494
Jian-Sheng Luo, Wen-Cai Jiang, Xian-Jie Zhang, Chao Xiong, Juan Xie, Wen-Hu Zhai
{"title":"自由禁食对无痛胃镜检查患者胃液量的影响:一项随机对照研究","authors":"Jian-Sheng Luo, Wen-Cai Jiang, Xian-Jie Zhang, Chao Xiong, Juan Xie, Wen-Hu Zhai","doi":"10.62347/LLMS3494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the impact of liberalized clear liquid intake on gastric fluid volume (GFV) in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>184 patients scheduled for elective sedation gastroscopy underwent 1:1 randomization to a liberal fasting group (n = 92) or a conventional fasting group (n = 92). The liberal protocol permitted clear liquid consumption (≤150 mL/h) until 30 minutes pre-procedure, whereas the conventional group maintained standard preoperative 2-hour fasting. GFV quantification was performed through dual-modality assessment (gastric ultrasound and endoscopic aspiration). The primary endpoint was GFV, with secondary outcomes comprising fasting duration modifications, protocol satisfaction, adverse event incidence, and inter-method agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant GFV differences emerged between groups as demonstrated by ultrasound or endoscopy. The liberal group demonstrated substantially shorter fasting durations and higher satisfaction scores, with comparable adverse event rates. Strong inter-method agreement was confirmed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Liberal fasting achieves equivalent GFV control compared to conventional protocols while optimizing patient comfort, supporting its safe implementation in painless gastroscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 5","pages":"3514-3520"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of liberal fluid fasting on gastric fluid volume in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy: a randomized controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Jian-Sheng Luo, Wen-Cai Jiang, Xian-Jie Zhang, Chao Xiong, Juan Xie, Wen-Hu Zhai\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/LLMS3494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the impact of liberalized clear liquid intake on gastric fluid volume (GFV) in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>184 patients scheduled for elective sedation gastroscopy underwent 1:1 randomization to a liberal fasting group (n = 92) or a conventional fasting group (n = 92). The liberal protocol permitted clear liquid consumption (≤150 mL/h) until 30 minutes pre-procedure, whereas the conventional group maintained standard preoperative 2-hour fasting. GFV quantification was performed through dual-modality assessment (gastric ultrasound and endoscopic aspiration). The primary endpoint was GFV, with secondary outcomes comprising fasting duration modifications, protocol satisfaction, adverse event incidence, and inter-method agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant GFV differences emerged between groups as demonstrated by ultrasound or endoscopy. The liberal group demonstrated substantially shorter fasting durations and higher satisfaction scores, with comparable adverse event rates. Strong inter-method agreement was confirmed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Liberal fasting achieves equivalent GFV control compared to conventional protocols while optimizing patient comfort, supporting its safe implementation in painless gastroscopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"3514-3520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170369/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/LLMS3494\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/LLMS3494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估游离清液摄入对无痛胃镜检查患者胃液量(GFV)的影响。方法:184例选择性镇静胃镜患者按1:1随机分组,分别分为自由禁食组(n = 92)和常规禁食组(n = 92)。自由方案允许清洁液体(≤150 mL/h)直到手术前30分钟,而常规组维持标准术前2小时禁食。GFV量化通过双模式评估(胃超声和内镜下吸吸)进行。主要终点是GFV,次要终点包括禁食时间改变、方案满意度、不良事件发生率和方法间一致性。结果:超声或内窥镜检查显示两组间GFV无明显差异。自由组表现出明显较短的禁食持续时间和较高的满意度得分,不良事件发生率相当。方法间的一致性得到了证实。结论:与传统方案相比,自由禁食在优化患者舒适度的同时达到了等效的GFV控制,支持其在无痛胃镜检查中的安全实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of liberal fluid fasting on gastric fluid volume in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy: a randomized controlled study.

Objective: This study assessed the impact of liberalized clear liquid intake on gastric fluid volume (GFV) in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy.

Methods: 184 patients scheduled for elective sedation gastroscopy underwent 1:1 randomization to a liberal fasting group (n = 92) or a conventional fasting group (n = 92). The liberal protocol permitted clear liquid consumption (≤150 mL/h) until 30 minutes pre-procedure, whereas the conventional group maintained standard preoperative 2-hour fasting. GFV quantification was performed through dual-modality assessment (gastric ultrasound and endoscopic aspiration). The primary endpoint was GFV, with secondary outcomes comprising fasting duration modifications, protocol satisfaction, adverse event incidence, and inter-method agreement.

Results: No significant GFV differences emerged between groups as demonstrated by ultrasound or endoscopy. The liberal group demonstrated substantially shorter fasting durations and higher satisfaction scores, with comparable adverse event rates. Strong inter-method agreement was confirmed.

Conclusion: Liberal fasting achieves equivalent GFV control compared to conventional protocols while optimizing patient comfort, supporting its safe implementation in painless gastroscopy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信