炎症标志物在表征间质性肺疾病进展中的预测作用:回顾性分析

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-05-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/JZTW5621
Delun Tan, Yaxue Shang, Jing Wang, Na Sheng
{"title":"炎症标志物在表征间质性肺疾病进展中的预测作用:回顾性分析","authors":"Delun Tan, Yaxue Shang, Jing Wang, Na Sheng","doi":"10.62347/JZTW5621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the association between inflammatory markers and interstitial lung disease (ILD) progression in order to enhance disease monitoring and risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed the clinical data from 172 ILD patients admitted to Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: progressive ILD (PILD; n=95) and rapidly progressive ILD (RPILD; n=77), based on changes in symptoms and pulmonary function within six months. PILD was defined by a ≥10% relative decline in predicted Forced Vital Capacity (ppFVC) or related clinical criteria. RPILD was defined by acute symptom worsening and significant pulmonary function deterioration. Inflammatory markers assessed included C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CRP, NLR, PLR, and SII levels were significantly higher in the RPILD group, while LMR was significantly lower (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified CRP, NLR, LMR, and SII as independent predictors of ILD progression. ROC analysis showed NLR had the highest individual predictive value (AUC=0.757). A composite model combining all five markers achieved an AUC of 0.842, indicating improved predictive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inflammatory markers, particularly NLR, are independently associated with ILD progression. A composite model incorporating multiple markers offers enhanced predictive performance, potentially supporting clinical decision-making and early intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 5","pages":"3485-3495"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive role of inflammatory markers in characterizing the progression of interstitial lung disease: a retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Delun Tan, Yaxue Shang, Jing Wang, Na Sheng\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/JZTW5621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the association between inflammatory markers and interstitial lung disease (ILD) progression in order to enhance disease monitoring and risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed the clinical data from 172 ILD patients admitted to Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: progressive ILD (PILD; n=95) and rapidly progressive ILD (RPILD; n=77), based on changes in symptoms and pulmonary function within six months. PILD was defined by a ≥10% relative decline in predicted Forced Vital Capacity (ppFVC) or related clinical criteria. RPILD was defined by acute symptom worsening and significant pulmonary function deterioration. Inflammatory markers assessed included C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CRP, NLR, PLR, and SII levels were significantly higher in the RPILD group, while LMR was significantly lower (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified CRP, NLR, LMR, and SII as independent predictors of ILD progression. ROC analysis showed NLR had the highest individual predictive value (AUC=0.757). A composite model combining all five markers achieved an AUC of 0.842, indicating improved predictive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inflammatory markers, particularly NLR, are independently associated with ILD progression. A composite model incorporating multiple markers offers enhanced predictive performance, potentially supporting clinical decision-making and early intervention strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"3485-3495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170371/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/JZTW5621\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/JZTW5621","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估炎症标志物与间质性肺疾病(ILD)进展之间的关系,以加强疾病监测和风险分层。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了2021年1月至2023年12月南京江北医院收治的172例ILD患者的临床资料。患者分为两组:进行性ILD (PILD;n=95)和快速进展性ILD (RPILD;N =77),基于6个月内症状和肺功能的变化。PILD的定义是预测用力肺活量(ppFVC)或相关临床标准相对下降≥10%。RPILD的定义为急性症状加重和明显的肺功能恶化。评估的炎症标志物包括c反应蛋白(CRP)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)。结果:CRP、NLR、PLR和SII水平在RPILD组显著升高,而LMR显著降低(所有结论:炎症标志物,尤其是NLR,与ILD进展独立相关。结合多种标志物的复合模型提供了增强的预测性能,潜在地支持临床决策和早期干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive role of inflammatory markers in characterizing the progression of interstitial lung disease: a retrospective analysis.

Objectives: To evaluate the association between inflammatory markers and interstitial lung disease (ILD) progression in order to enhance disease monitoring and risk stratification.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the clinical data from 172 ILD patients admitted to Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: progressive ILD (PILD; n=95) and rapidly progressive ILD (RPILD; n=77), based on changes in symptoms and pulmonary function within six months. PILD was defined by a ≥10% relative decline in predicted Forced Vital Capacity (ppFVC) or related clinical criteria. RPILD was defined by acute symptom worsening and significant pulmonary function deterioration. Inflammatory markers assessed included C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII).

Results: CRP, NLR, PLR, and SII levels were significantly higher in the RPILD group, while LMR was significantly lower (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified CRP, NLR, LMR, and SII as independent predictors of ILD progression. ROC analysis showed NLR had the highest individual predictive value (AUC=0.757). A composite model combining all five markers achieved an AUC of 0.842, indicating improved predictive accuracy.

Conclusions: Inflammatory markers, particularly NLR, are independently associated with ILD progression. A composite model incorporating multiple markers offers enhanced predictive performance, potentially supporting clinical decision-making and early intervention strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信