综合药检用试纸中药物提取方法的优化研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Meghan G. Appley, Elise M. Pyfrom, Rae A. Elkasabany, Rick Rousch, Edward Sisco
{"title":"综合药检用试纸中药物提取方法的优化研究。","authors":"Meghan G. Appley,&nbsp;Elise M. Pyfrom,&nbsp;Rae A. Elkasabany,&nbsp;Rick Rousch,&nbsp;Edward Sisco","doi":"10.1002/dta.3911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Drug-checking programs use point-of-need testing (e.g., test strips) and laboratory-based analysis to rapidly identify emerging drug threats, but each has limitations. Test strips are quick but compound or class specific, whereas laboratory testing can identify more compounds but have lengthy turnaround times. To address these limitations, it was proposed that compounds could be extracted from used test strips for additional analyses allowing for rapid on-site information followed by comprehensive laboratory results. The method development process involved four parts: determining the optimal extraction approach, assessing the feasibility of performing direct analysis in real-time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) analysis on extracts, determining the limits of detection (LODs) for a range of analytes, and evaluating the method using used test strips submitted by harm reduction sites. The optimized method consisted of extracting analytes of interest from a cut test strip using 0.5-mL methanol while vortexing for 10 s. DART-MS successfully identified the compounds of interests, and the test strip chemical background was identified. LODs were found to be as low as a mass fraction of 0.005 in a mixture. For the samples submitted by harm reduction sites, concordance between extracts and test strip results was 96%, and the agreement in compound identification between used test strip extracts and authentic drug collection samples was approximately 80% regardless of test strip type and preparation. This work shows that additional analyses of extracted test strips can provide a low-barrier way for high-quality testing that can be used to increase data on the drug landscape.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":"17 10","pages":"2054-2065"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of an Optimized Extraction Method to Recover Drug Material From Used Test Strips for Comprehensive Drug Checking\",\"authors\":\"Meghan G. Appley,&nbsp;Elise M. Pyfrom,&nbsp;Rae A. Elkasabany,&nbsp;Rick Rousch,&nbsp;Edward Sisco\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dta.3911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Drug-checking programs use point-of-need testing (e.g., test strips) and laboratory-based analysis to rapidly identify emerging drug threats, but each has limitations. Test strips are quick but compound or class specific, whereas laboratory testing can identify more compounds but have lengthy turnaround times. To address these limitations, it was proposed that compounds could be extracted from used test strips for additional analyses allowing for rapid on-site information followed by comprehensive laboratory results. The method development process involved four parts: determining the optimal extraction approach, assessing the feasibility of performing direct analysis in real-time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) analysis on extracts, determining the limits of detection (LODs) for a range of analytes, and evaluating the method using used test strips submitted by harm reduction sites. The optimized method consisted of extracting analytes of interest from a cut test strip using 0.5-mL methanol while vortexing for 10 s. DART-MS successfully identified the compounds of interests, and the test strip chemical background was identified. LODs were found to be as low as a mass fraction of 0.005 in a mixture. For the samples submitted by harm reduction sites, concordance between extracts and test strip results was 96%, and the agreement in compound identification between used test strip extracts and authentic drug collection samples was approximately 80% regardless of test strip type and preparation. This work shows that additional analyses of extracted test strips can provide a low-barrier way for high-quality testing that can be used to increase data on the drug landscape.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Testing and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"2054-2065\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Testing and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dta.3911\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dta.3911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物检查程序使用即时检测(例如,试纸)和基于实验室的分析来快速识别新出现的药物威胁,但每种方法都有局限性。试纸快速,但化合物或类别特定,而实验室测试可以识别更多的化合物,但周转时间较长。为了解决这些限制,有人建议可以从使用过的试纸中提取化合物进行额外的分析,以便快速获得现场信息,然后获得全面的实验室结果。方法开发过程包括四个部分:确定最佳提取方法,评估对提取物进行实时质谱(DART-MS)直接分析的可行性,确定一系列分析物的检出限(lod),以及使用危害减少站点提交的使用过的试纸评估方法。优化后的方法是用0.5 ml甲醇涡流10 s从切割的测试条上提取感兴趣的分析物。DART-MS成功鉴定了感兴趣的化合物,并确定了测试条的化学背景。发现lod在混合物中的质量分数低至0.005。对于减少危害站点提交的样品,提取液与试纸结果的一致性为96%,无论试纸类型和制剂如何,使用的试纸提取液与正品药物采集样品的化合物鉴定一致性约为80%。这项工作表明,对提取的测试条进行额外的分析可以为高质量的测试提供一种低障碍的方法,可用于增加药物领域的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development of an Optimized Extraction Method to Recover Drug Material From Used Test Strips for Comprehensive Drug Checking

Development of an Optimized Extraction Method to Recover Drug Material From Used Test Strips for Comprehensive Drug Checking

Drug-checking programs use point-of-need testing (e.g., test strips) and laboratory-based analysis to rapidly identify emerging drug threats, but each has limitations. Test strips are quick but compound or class specific, whereas laboratory testing can identify more compounds but have lengthy turnaround times. To address these limitations, it was proposed that compounds could be extracted from used test strips for additional analyses allowing for rapid on-site information followed by comprehensive laboratory results. The method development process involved four parts: determining the optimal extraction approach, assessing the feasibility of performing direct analysis in real-time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) analysis on extracts, determining the limits of detection (LODs) for a range of analytes, and evaluating the method using used test strips submitted by harm reduction sites. The optimized method consisted of extracting analytes of interest from a cut test strip using 0.5-mL methanol while vortexing for 10 s. DART-MS successfully identified the compounds of interests, and the test strip chemical background was identified. LODs were found to be as low as a mass fraction of 0.005 in a mixture. For the samples submitted by harm reduction sites, concordance between extracts and test strip results was 96%, and the agreement in compound identification between used test strip extracts and authentic drug collection samples was approximately 80% regardless of test strip type and preparation. This work shows that additional analyses of extracted test strips can provide a low-barrier way for high-quality testing that can be used to increase data on the drug landscape.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Testing and Analysis
Drug Testing and Analysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
24.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: As the incidence of drugs escalates in 21st century living, their detection and analysis have become increasingly important. Sport, the workplace, crime investigation, homeland security, the pharmaceutical industry and the environment are just some of the high profile arenas in which analytical testing has provided an important investigative tool for uncovering the presence of extraneous substances. In addition to the usual publishing fare of primary research articles, case reports and letters, Drug Testing and Analysis offers a unique combination of; ‘How to’ material such as ‘Tutorials’ and ‘Reviews’, Speculative pieces (‘Commentaries’ and ‘Perspectives'', providing a broader scientific and social context to the aspects of analytical testing), ‘Annual banned substance reviews’ (delivering a critical evaluation of the methods used in the characterization of established and newly outlawed compounds). Rather than focus on the application of a single technique, Drug Testing and Analysis employs a unique multidisciplinary approach to the field of controversial compound determination. Papers discussing chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunological approaches, 1D/2D gel electrophoresis, to name just a few select methods, are welcomed where their application is related to any of the six key topics listed below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信