Thomas O’Donnell, Stephanie Weinstein, Yukiko Yano, Paul Albert, Amanda Black, Michelle Brotzman, Norma Diaz-Mayoral, Alaina Shreves, Nicole Gerlanc, Kathleen Wyatt, Mia M. Gaudet, Christian Abnet and Nicolas Wentzensen*,
{"title":"分析前条件对血液炎症生物标志物的影响。","authors":"Thomas O’Donnell, Stephanie Weinstein, Yukiko Yano, Paul Albert, Amanda Black, Michelle Brotzman, Norma Diaz-Mayoral, Alaina Shreves, Nicole Gerlanc, Kathleen Wyatt, Mia M. Gaudet, Christian Abnet and Nicolas Wentzensen*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Blood-based inflammation biomarkers have potential for diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive testing, but preanalytical processing conditions can affect biomarker levels. We investigated how needle-to-freezer time, centrifugation timing, and tube types influence inflammation biomarkers. Twenty subjects donated 21 different blood samples in collection tubes, including plasma and serum types. Ninety-two biomarkers from each sample were analyzed using the Olink Target 96 Inflammation panel. We compared biomarker concentrations across different preanalytical variables to a reference standard tube. Intraclass, Pearson, and Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated. We also assessed the impact of these conditions on age-related associations with biomarkers. Across the preprocessing protocol/blood matrix combinations, 38%–83%, 50%–87%, and 47%–79% of proteins showed good to excellent correlations in intraclass, Pearson, and Spearman analyses, respectively. Eighteen proteins differed by >0.5 NPX units between test and reference protocols. Among 30 comparisons of age-related biomarker associations showing <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 at baseline, 12 (40%) maintained a <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 across all needle-to-freezer times. Many proteins in the Olink Target 96 Inflammation panel exhibited robust stability across various preanalytical conditions, indicating that blood-based inflammation biomarkers are suitable for testing across different blood specimen types. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of long-term storage.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":"24 7","pages":"3683–3688"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Preanalytical Conditions on Blood-Based Inflammation Biomarkers\",\"authors\":\"Thomas O’Donnell, Stephanie Weinstein, Yukiko Yano, Paul Albert, Amanda Black, Michelle Brotzman, Norma Diaz-Mayoral, Alaina Shreves, Nicole Gerlanc, Kathleen Wyatt, Mia M. Gaudet, Christian Abnet and Nicolas Wentzensen*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Blood-based inflammation biomarkers have potential for diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive testing, but preanalytical processing conditions can affect biomarker levels. We investigated how needle-to-freezer time, centrifugation timing, and tube types influence inflammation biomarkers. Twenty subjects donated 21 different blood samples in collection tubes, including plasma and serum types. Ninety-two biomarkers from each sample were analyzed using the Olink Target 96 Inflammation panel. We compared biomarker concentrations across different preanalytical variables to a reference standard tube. Intraclass, Pearson, and Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated. We also assessed the impact of these conditions on age-related associations with biomarkers. Across the preprocessing protocol/blood matrix combinations, 38%–83%, 50%–87%, and 47%–79% of proteins showed good to excellent correlations in intraclass, Pearson, and Spearman analyses, respectively. Eighteen proteins differed by >0.5 NPX units between test and reference protocols. Among 30 comparisons of age-related biomarker associations showing <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 at baseline, 12 (40%) maintained a <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 across all needle-to-freezer times. Many proteins in the Olink Target 96 Inflammation panel exhibited robust stability across various preanalytical conditions, indicating that blood-based inflammation biomarkers are suitable for testing across different blood specimen types. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of long-term storage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Proteome Research\",\"volume\":\"24 7\",\"pages\":\"3683–3688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Proteome Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00225\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00225","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effect of Preanalytical Conditions on Blood-Based Inflammation Biomarkers
Blood-based inflammation biomarkers have potential for diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive testing, but preanalytical processing conditions can affect biomarker levels. We investigated how needle-to-freezer time, centrifugation timing, and tube types influence inflammation biomarkers. Twenty subjects donated 21 different blood samples in collection tubes, including plasma and serum types. Ninety-two biomarkers from each sample were analyzed using the Olink Target 96 Inflammation panel. We compared biomarker concentrations across different preanalytical variables to a reference standard tube. Intraclass, Pearson, and Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated. We also assessed the impact of these conditions on age-related associations with biomarkers. Across the preprocessing protocol/blood matrix combinations, 38%–83%, 50%–87%, and 47%–79% of proteins showed good to excellent correlations in intraclass, Pearson, and Spearman analyses, respectively. Eighteen proteins differed by >0.5 NPX units between test and reference protocols. Among 30 comparisons of age-related biomarker associations showing p ≤ 0.05 at baseline, 12 (40%) maintained a p ≤ 0.05 across all needle-to-freezer times. Many proteins in the Olink Target 96 Inflammation panel exhibited robust stability across various preanalytical conditions, indicating that blood-based inflammation biomarkers are suitable for testing across different blood specimen types. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of long-term storage.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".