创业架构——欧洲、美国和拉美大学的比较

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS
Artur Tavares Vilas Boas Ribeiro, Ricardo Reolon Jorge, Guilherme Ary Plonski, David Vandyke Gibson
{"title":"创业架构——欧洲、美国和拉美大学的比较","authors":"Artur Tavares Vilas Boas Ribeiro,&nbsp;Ricardo Reolon Jorge,&nbsp;Guilherme Ary Plonski,&nbsp;David Vandyke Gibson","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A cornerstone for economic growth, universities have been impelled to the entrepreneurial turn to transform their knowledge into innovations and new ventures. A common strategy from university managers is to rely on the best practices and benchmarks of entrepreneurial universities. However, universities are heterogeneous and context-dependent, thus requiring an in-depth understanding of their missions, structural characteristics, and regional history, among other factors. Using the entrepreneurial architecture approach, this paper presents space and place differences from universities in Europe, Latin America, and the United States. Data was collected from 41 leaders from universities worldwide and analyzed through lexicometry methods. Results indicate how heterogeneity implies distinct organizational structures in universities, such as in strategy making, science commercialization culture, and the role of Technology Transfer Offices.</p>","PeriodicalId":47349,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","volume":"42 2","pages":"185-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entrepreneurial architecture—A comparison among Europe, United States and Latin America universities\",\"authors\":\"Artur Tavares Vilas Boas Ribeiro,&nbsp;Ricardo Reolon Jorge,&nbsp;Guilherme Ary Plonski,&nbsp;David Vandyke Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjas.1776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A cornerstone for economic growth, universities have been impelled to the entrepreneurial turn to transform their knowledge into innovations and new ventures. A common strategy from university managers is to rely on the best practices and benchmarks of entrepreneurial universities. However, universities are heterogeneous and context-dependent, thus requiring an in-depth understanding of their missions, structural characteristics, and regional history, among other factors. Using the entrepreneurial architecture approach, this paper presents space and place differences from universities in Europe, Latin America, and the United States. Data was collected from 41 leaders from universities worldwide and analyzed through lexicometry methods. Results indicate how heterogeneity implies distinct organizational structures in universities, such as in strategy making, science commercialization culture, and the role of Technology Transfer Offices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"185-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.1776\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.1776","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为经济增长的基石,大学已经被迫转向创业,将他们的知识转化为创新和新的企业。大学管理者的一个共同策略是依赖于创业型大学的最佳实践和基准。然而,大学是异质的、依赖于环境的,因此需要深入了解它们的使命、结构特征和区域历史等因素。本文运用创业架构的方法,展示了欧洲、拉丁美洲和美国大学的空间和地点差异。从全球41所大学的领导者那里收集数据,并通过词汇计量学方法进行分析。研究结果表明,异质性意味着大学组织结构的不同,如战略制定、科学商业化文化和技术转移办公室的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Entrepreneurial architecture—A comparison among Europe, United States and Latin America universities

A cornerstone for economic growth, universities have been impelled to the entrepreneurial turn to transform their knowledge into innovations and new ventures. A common strategy from university managers is to rely on the best practices and benchmarks of entrepreneurial universities. However, universities are heterogeneous and context-dependent, thus requiring an in-depth understanding of their missions, structural characteristics, and regional history, among other factors. Using the entrepreneurial architecture approach, this paper presents space and place differences from universities in Europe, Latin America, and the United States. Data was collected from 41 leaders from universities worldwide and analyzed through lexicometry methods. Results indicate how heterogeneity implies distinct organizational structures in universities, such as in strategy making, science commercialization culture, and the role of Technology Transfer Offices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (CJAS) is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, international quarterly that publishes manuscripts with a strong theoretical foundation. The journal welcomes literature reviews, quantitative and qualitative studies as well as conceptual pieces. CJAS is an ISI-listed journal that publishes papers in all key disciplines of business. CJAS is a particularly suitable home for manuscripts of a crossdisciplinary nature. All papers must state in an explicit and compelling way their unique contribution to advancing theory and/or practice in the administrative sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信