心电图异常和生物标志物使正常血压急性肺栓塞患者的风险快速分层

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Siqi Jiao, Ying Liu, Haoming He, Qing Li, Zhe Wang, Yinong Chen, Longyang Zhu, Shuwen Zheng, Furong Yang, Zhenguo Zhai, Yihong Sun
{"title":"心电图异常和生物标志物使正常血压急性肺栓塞患者的风险快速分层","authors":"Siqi Jiao,&nbsp;Ying Liu,&nbsp;Haoming He,&nbsp;Qing Li,&nbsp;Zhe Wang,&nbsp;Yinong Chen,&nbsp;Longyang Zhu,&nbsp;Shuwen Zheng,&nbsp;Furong Yang,&nbsp;Zhenguo Zhai,&nbsp;Yihong Sun","doi":"10.1111/crj.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) were usually screened using electrocardiogram (ECG) and blood panel of D-dimer, troponin, and blood gas analysis in the emergency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to explore a rapid risk model to predict in-hospital adverse events for normotensive PE patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with acute PE having normal blood pressure on appearance were retrospectively enrolled at China-Japan Friendship Hospital from January 2017 to February 2020. The in-hospital adverse events were defined as death and clinical deterioration during hospitalization. The risk model for in-hospital adverse events was generated by multivariate regression analysis. The discrimination ability of the model was compared with PESI, Bova, and FAST risk score, and evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement index (IDI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 213 patients, 35 (16.4%) experienced in-hospital adverse events,y including 15 deaths. The average age was 69 ± 19 years, and 118 (44.6%) were females. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that independent risk factors associated with in-hospital adverse events were low QRS voltage in ECG (OR: 5.321; 95% CI: 1.608–7.310), positive age-adjusted D-dimer (OR: 2.061; 95% CI: 0.622–6.836), positive troponin (OR: 3.504; 95% CI: 1.744–8.259), and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> &lt; 300 (OR: 3.268; 95% CI: 0.978–5.260). The ROC analysis showed that the AUC of the new model (0.847, 95% CI: 0.786–0.901) was better than the PESI score (0.628, 95% CI: 0.509–0.769), the Bova score (0.701, 95% CI: 0.594–0.808), and the FAST score (0.775 95% CI: 0.690–0.859).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>ECG abnormalities and biomarkers on admission may provide a rapid and effective approach to identify patients with poor prognoses during hospitalization.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55247,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"19 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/crj.70060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ECG Abnormalities and Biomarkers Enable Rapid Risk Stratification in Normotensive Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism\",\"authors\":\"Siqi Jiao,&nbsp;Ying Liu,&nbsp;Haoming He,&nbsp;Qing Li,&nbsp;Zhe Wang,&nbsp;Yinong Chen,&nbsp;Longyang Zhu,&nbsp;Shuwen Zheng,&nbsp;Furong Yang,&nbsp;Zhenguo Zhai,&nbsp;Yihong Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/crj.70060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) were usually screened using electrocardiogram (ECG) and blood panel of D-dimer, troponin, and blood gas analysis in the emergency.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to explore a rapid risk model to predict in-hospital adverse events for normotensive PE patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients with acute PE having normal blood pressure on appearance were retrospectively enrolled at China-Japan Friendship Hospital from January 2017 to February 2020. The in-hospital adverse events were defined as death and clinical deterioration during hospitalization. The risk model for in-hospital adverse events was generated by multivariate regression analysis. The discrimination ability of the model was compared with PESI, Bova, and FAST risk score, and evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement index (IDI).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the 213 patients, 35 (16.4%) experienced in-hospital adverse events,y including 15 deaths. The average age was 69 ± 19 years, and 118 (44.6%) were females. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that independent risk factors associated with in-hospital adverse events were low QRS voltage in ECG (OR: 5.321; 95% CI: 1.608–7.310), positive age-adjusted D-dimer (OR: 2.061; 95% CI: 0.622–6.836), positive troponin (OR: 3.504; 95% CI: 1.744–8.259), and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> &lt; 300 (OR: 3.268; 95% CI: 0.978–5.260). The ROC analysis showed that the AUC of the new model (0.847, 95% CI: 0.786–0.901) was better than the PESI score (0.628, 95% CI: 0.509–0.769), the Bova score (0.701, 95% CI: 0.594–0.808), and the FAST score (0.775 95% CI: 0.690–0.859).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>ECG abnormalities and biomarkers on admission may provide a rapid and effective approach to identify patients with poor prognoses during hospitalization.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/crj.70060\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/crj.70060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/crj.70060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对疑似肺栓塞(PE)的患者,急诊通常采用心电图(ECG)、d -二聚体、肌钙蛋白、血气分析筛查。目的探讨一种快速预测正常血压肺动脉栓塞患者住院不良事件的风险模型。方法回顾性分析2017年1月至2020年2月在中日友好医院就诊、外观血压正常的急性肺水肿患者。住院不良事件定义为住院期间的死亡和临床恶化。通过多因素回归分析,建立院内不良事件风险模型。将模型的判别能力与PESI、Bova、FAST风险评分进行比较,并采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)、净重分类改善(NRI)、综合判别改善指数(IDI)进行评价。结果213例患者中有35例(16.4%)发生院内不良事件,其中死亡15例。平均年龄69±19岁,女性118例(44.6%)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,与院内不良事件相关的独立危险因素为心电图QRS电压低(OR: 5.321;95% CI: 1.608-7.310),年龄调整d -二聚体阳性(OR: 2.061;95% CI: 0.622-6.836),肌钙蛋白阳性(OR: 3.504;95% CI: 1.744-8.259), PaO2/FiO2 < 300 (OR: 3.268;95% ci: 0.978-5.260)。ROC分析显示,新模型的AUC (0.847, 95% CI: 0.786 ~ 0.901)优于PESI评分(0.628,95% CI: 0.509 ~ 0.769)、Bova评分(0.701,95% CI: 0.594 ~ 0.808)和FAST评分(0.775,95% CI: 0.690 ~ 0.859)。结论入院时的心电图异常和生物标志物可为诊断住院期间预后不良患者提供快速有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ECG Abnormalities and Biomarkers Enable Rapid Risk Stratification in Normotensive Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Background

The patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) were usually screened using electrocardiogram (ECG) and blood panel of D-dimer, troponin, and blood gas analysis in the emergency.

Objectives

This study aimed to explore a rapid risk model to predict in-hospital adverse events for normotensive PE patients.

Methods

Patients with acute PE having normal blood pressure on appearance were retrospectively enrolled at China-Japan Friendship Hospital from January 2017 to February 2020. The in-hospital adverse events were defined as death and clinical deterioration during hospitalization. The risk model for in-hospital adverse events was generated by multivariate regression analysis. The discrimination ability of the model was compared with PESI, Bova, and FAST risk score, and evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement index (IDI).

Results

Of the 213 patients, 35 (16.4%) experienced in-hospital adverse events,y including 15 deaths. The average age was 69 ± 19 years, and 118 (44.6%) were females. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that independent risk factors associated with in-hospital adverse events were low QRS voltage in ECG (OR: 5.321; 95% CI: 1.608–7.310), positive age-adjusted D-dimer (OR: 2.061; 95% CI: 0.622–6.836), positive troponin (OR: 3.504; 95% CI: 1.744–8.259), and PaO2/FiO2 < 300 (OR: 3.268; 95% CI: 0.978–5.260). The ROC analysis showed that the AUC of the new model (0.847, 95% CI: 0.786–0.901) was better than the PESI score (0.628, 95% CI: 0.509–0.769), the Bova score (0.701, 95% CI: 0.594–0.808), and the FAST score (0.775 95% CI: 0.690–0.859).

Conclusion

ECG abnormalities and biomarkers on admission may provide a rapid and effective approach to identify patients with poor prognoses during hospitalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Respiratory Journal
Clinical Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Overview Effective with the 2016 volume, this journal will be published in an online-only format. Aims and Scope The Clinical Respiratory Journal (CRJ) provides a forum for clinical research in all areas of respiratory medicine from clinical lung disease to basic research relevant to the clinic. We publish original research, review articles, case studies, editorials and book reviews in all areas of clinical lung disease including: Asthma Allergy COPD Non-invasive ventilation Sleep related breathing disorders Interstitial lung diseases Lung cancer Clinical genetics Rhinitis Airway and lung infection Epidemiology Pediatrics CRJ provides a fast-track service for selected Phase II and Phase III trial studies. Keywords Clinical Respiratory Journal, respiratory, pulmonary, medicine, clinical, lung disease, Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing) Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Embase (Elsevier) Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest) HEED: Health Economic Evaluations Database (Wiley-Blackwell) Hospital Premium Collection (ProQuest) Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics) MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics) SCOPUS (Elsevier)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信