木材采伐和运输专业人员的工作量-一项基于芬兰调查研究的研究

IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Marja K. Kallioniemi , Hanna-Riitta Kymäläinen , Janne Kaseva , Esa Katajamäki
{"title":"木材采伐和运输专业人员的工作量-一项基于芬兰调查研究的研究","authors":"Marja K. Kallioniemi ,&nbsp;Hanna-Riitta Kymäläinen ,&nbsp;Janne Kaseva ,&nbsp;Esa Katajamäki","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study focused on workload in forest harvesting and among transportation professionals and included all professional groups of the occupational sector: timber truck drivers, plant drivers, loggers and timber workers, officers, and other workers. A postal and Internet survey (<em>N</em> = 1282, response rate 32 %) comprised five variables indicating workload: stress, sense of control, mental load, working hours per week, and harmful factors at work. A random sampling (<em>N</em> = 4000), adjusted to professional groups, was carried out based on different databases and a register including information about forestry professionals. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated the associated variables of stress. Over half of the sample respondents (59 %) reported stress and nearly half (47 %) assessed their work as mentally straining. Poor recovery from work was especially associated with stress. The average number of working hours per week (44.9 h) was large, and several respondent groups worked over 50 h per week. The most common harmful factors at work were sitting for a long time, similar, repetitive work movements, working alone, vibration, and coldness or draft. Vulnerable groups to workload were those with higher education levels, officers, women, and employers. Cooperation between stakeholders is needed to alleviate the heavy workload in this work sector, which includes a lot of small enterprises and self-employed persons working in a changing operational environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 103530"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workload in wood harvesting and among transportation professionals — A study based on survey research in Finland\",\"authors\":\"Marja K. Kallioniemi ,&nbsp;Hanna-Riitta Kymäläinen ,&nbsp;Janne Kaseva ,&nbsp;Esa Katajamäki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study focused on workload in forest harvesting and among transportation professionals and included all professional groups of the occupational sector: timber truck drivers, plant drivers, loggers and timber workers, officers, and other workers. A postal and Internet survey (<em>N</em> = 1282, response rate 32 %) comprised five variables indicating workload: stress, sense of control, mental load, working hours per week, and harmful factors at work. A random sampling (<em>N</em> = 4000), adjusted to professional groups, was carried out based on different databases and a register including information about forestry professionals. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated the associated variables of stress. Over half of the sample respondents (59 %) reported stress and nearly half (47 %) assessed their work as mentally straining. Poor recovery from work was especially associated with stress. The average number of working hours per week (44.9 h) was large, and several respondent groups worked over 50 h per week. The most common harmful factors at work were sitting for a long time, similar, repetitive work movements, working alone, vibration, and coldness or draft. Vulnerable groups to workload were those with higher education levels, officers, women, and employers. Cooperation between stakeholders is needed to alleviate the heavy workload in this work sector, which includes a lot of small enterprises and self-employed persons working in a changing operational environment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001091\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的重点是森林采伐和运输专业人员的工作量,包括职业部门的所有专业群体:木材卡车司机、工厂司机、伐木工人和木材工人、官员和其他工人。一项邮政和网络调查(N = 1282,回复率32%)包含五个变量表示工作量:压力、控制感、精神负荷、每周工作时间和工作中的有害因素。根据不同的数据库和包含林业专业人员信息的登记册进行随机抽样(N = 4000),调整为专业群体。单因素方差分析(ANOVA)显示了压力的相关变量。超过一半的受访者(59%)表示有压力,近一半(47%)的人认为他们的工作让他们精神紧张。工作后恢复不佳尤其与压力有关。每周平均工作时数(44.9小时)很大,一些被调查者每周工作超过50小时。工作中最常见的有害因素是长时间坐着、相似、重复的工作动作、独自工作、振动、寒冷或通风。易受工作量影响的群体是那些受过高等教育的人、官员、妇女和雇主。需要利益相关者之间的合作来减轻这一工作部门的繁重工作量,其中包括许多在不断变化的业务环境中工作的小企业和个体户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Workload in wood harvesting and among transportation professionals — A study based on survey research in Finland
This study focused on workload in forest harvesting and among transportation professionals and included all professional groups of the occupational sector: timber truck drivers, plant drivers, loggers and timber workers, officers, and other workers. A postal and Internet survey (N = 1282, response rate 32 %) comprised five variables indicating workload: stress, sense of control, mental load, working hours per week, and harmful factors at work. A random sampling (N = 4000), adjusted to professional groups, was carried out based on different databases and a register including information about forestry professionals. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated the associated variables of stress. Over half of the sample respondents (59 %) reported stress and nearly half (47 %) assessed their work as mentally straining. Poor recovery from work was especially associated with stress. The average number of working hours per week (44.9 h) was large, and several respondent groups worked over 50 h per week. The most common harmful factors at work were sitting for a long time, similar, repetitive work movements, working alone, vibration, and coldness or draft. Vulnerable groups to workload were those with higher education levels, officers, women, and employers. Cooperation between stakeholders is needed to alleviate the heavy workload in this work sector, which includes a lot of small enterprises and self-employed persons working in a changing operational environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信