{"title":"市场份额、电厂所有权和可再生资源的优序效应:来自澳大利亚国家电力市场的证据","authors":"Clinton J. Levitt, Skylar Lovell","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing reliance on wind and solar generation motivates the need to continue investigating their impact on electricity markets. Complications continue to arise because of the ongoing concern about the potential of dominant firms to exert significant market power in electricity markets. This paper aims to empirically investigate whether market power has a mitigating effect on the merit-order effect (MOE) of solar and wind generation and to determine whether changes to pricing policies worked to alleviate any of the mitigating effects. We analyse the New South Wales (NSW) wholesale electricity by analysing market outcomes for each five-minute dispatch auction from 2019 to 2022. Our main conclusion is that there is no substantial empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the market power of the dominant firm mitigated the MOE of wind generation over the sample period. The only significant evidence of a mitigating effect was in dispatch intervals in which the dominant firm was a pivotal supplier. Our analysis provides evidence that the dominant firm internalised the potential loss in revenue from coal generation due to the MOE from its wind generation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 101990"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market share, plant ownership, and the merit-order effect of renewable resources: Evidence from Australia’s National Electricity Market\",\"authors\":\"Clinton J. Levitt, Skylar Lovell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The increasing reliance on wind and solar generation motivates the need to continue investigating their impact on electricity markets. Complications continue to arise because of the ongoing concern about the potential of dominant firms to exert significant market power in electricity markets. This paper aims to empirically investigate whether market power has a mitigating effect on the merit-order effect (MOE) of solar and wind generation and to determine whether changes to pricing policies worked to alleviate any of the mitigating effects. We analyse the New South Wales (NSW) wholesale electricity by analysing market outcomes for each five-minute dispatch auction from 2019 to 2022. Our main conclusion is that there is no substantial empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the market power of the dominant firm mitigated the MOE of wind generation over the sample period. The only significant evidence of a mitigating effect was in dispatch intervals in which the dominant firm was a pivotal supplier. Our analysis provides evidence that the dominant firm internalised the potential loss in revenue from coal generation due to the MOE from its wind generation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101990\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001055\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Market share, plant ownership, and the merit-order effect of renewable resources: Evidence from Australia’s National Electricity Market
The increasing reliance on wind and solar generation motivates the need to continue investigating their impact on electricity markets. Complications continue to arise because of the ongoing concern about the potential of dominant firms to exert significant market power in electricity markets. This paper aims to empirically investigate whether market power has a mitigating effect on the merit-order effect (MOE) of solar and wind generation and to determine whether changes to pricing policies worked to alleviate any of the mitigating effects. We analyse the New South Wales (NSW) wholesale electricity by analysing market outcomes for each five-minute dispatch auction from 2019 to 2022. Our main conclusion is that there is no substantial empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the market power of the dominant firm mitigated the MOE of wind generation over the sample period. The only significant evidence of a mitigating effect was in dispatch intervals in which the dominant firm was a pivotal supplier. Our analysis provides evidence that the dominant firm internalised the potential loss in revenue from coal generation due to the MOE from its wind generation.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.