市场份额、电厂所有权和可再生资源的优序效应:来自澳大利亚国家电力市场的证据

IF 4.4 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Clinton J. Levitt, Skylar Lovell
{"title":"市场份额、电厂所有权和可再生资源的优序效应:来自澳大利亚国家电力市场的证据","authors":"Clinton J. Levitt,&nbsp;Skylar Lovell","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing reliance on wind and solar generation motivates the need to continue investigating their impact on electricity markets. Complications continue to arise because of the ongoing concern about the potential of dominant firms to exert significant market power in electricity markets. This paper aims to empirically investigate whether market power has a mitigating effect on the merit-order effect (MOE) of solar and wind generation and to determine whether changes to pricing policies worked to alleviate any of the mitigating effects. We analyse the New South Wales (NSW) wholesale electricity by analysing market outcomes for each five-minute dispatch auction from 2019 to 2022. Our main conclusion is that there is no substantial empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the market power of the dominant firm mitigated the MOE of wind generation over the sample period. The only significant evidence of a mitigating effect was in dispatch intervals in which the dominant firm was a pivotal supplier. Our analysis provides evidence that the dominant firm internalised the potential loss in revenue from coal generation due to the MOE from its wind generation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 101990"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market share, plant ownership, and the merit-order effect of renewable resources: Evidence from Australia’s National Electricity Market\",\"authors\":\"Clinton J. Levitt,&nbsp;Skylar Lovell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The increasing reliance on wind and solar generation motivates the need to continue investigating their impact on electricity markets. Complications continue to arise because of the ongoing concern about the potential of dominant firms to exert significant market power in electricity markets. This paper aims to empirically investigate whether market power has a mitigating effect on the merit-order effect (MOE) of solar and wind generation and to determine whether changes to pricing policies worked to alleviate any of the mitigating effects. We analyse the New South Wales (NSW) wholesale electricity by analysing market outcomes for each five-minute dispatch auction from 2019 to 2022. Our main conclusion is that there is no substantial empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the market power of the dominant firm mitigated the MOE of wind generation over the sample period. The only significant evidence of a mitigating effect was in dispatch intervals in which the dominant firm was a pivotal supplier. Our analysis provides evidence that the dominant firm internalised the potential loss in revenue from coal generation due to the MOE from its wind generation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101990\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001055\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对风能和太阳能发电的日益依赖促使人们有必要继续调查它们对电力市场的影响。由于对主导公司在电力市场中发挥重要市场力量的潜力的持续关注,复杂性继续出现。本文旨在实证研究市场力量是否对太阳能和风能发电的优序效应(MOE)有缓解作用,并确定价格政策的变化是否有效缓解任何缓解效应。我们通过分析2019年至2022年每五分钟调度拍卖的市场结果来分析新南威尔士州(NSW)的批发电力。我们的主要结论是,没有实质性的经验证据支持主导企业的市场力量在样本期间减轻风力发电的MOE的假设。缓解效应的唯一重要证据是在调度间隔中,占主导地位的公司是关键供应商。我们的分析提供了证据,表明占主导地位的公司内部化了因风电发电而造成的煤炭发电收入潜在损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Market share, plant ownership, and the merit-order effect of renewable resources: Evidence from Australia’s National Electricity Market
The increasing reliance on wind and solar generation motivates the need to continue investigating their impact on electricity markets. Complications continue to arise because of the ongoing concern about the potential of dominant firms to exert significant market power in electricity markets. This paper aims to empirically investigate whether market power has a mitigating effect on the merit-order effect (MOE) of solar and wind generation and to determine whether changes to pricing policies worked to alleviate any of the mitigating effects. We analyse the New South Wales (NSW) wholesale electricity by analysing market outcomes for each five-minute dispatch auction from 2019 to 2022. Our main conclusion is that there is no substantial empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the market power of the dominant firm mitigated the MOE of wind generation over the sample period. The only significant evidence of a mitigating effect was in dispatch intervals in which the dominant firm was a pivotal supplier. Our analysis provides evidence that the dominant firm internalised the potential loss in revenue from coal generation due to the MOE from its wind generation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信