{"title":"白桦圆蚧(双翅目:绢蚧科)及其周围寄主组织(白僵菌和白僵菌)诱导的瘿内内生真菌多样性","authors":"Shannon L. Sharpe, Dale Casamatta, Anthony Rossi","doi":"10.1016/j.funeco.2025.101441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Asphondylia borrichiae</em> gall midges deposit endophytic fungi (EF) during oviposition. However, their fungal associations, EF diversity across host plants, and potential interactions between them all remain poorly understood. Galls and tissues from two hosts (<em>Borrichia frutescens</em> and <em>Iva frutescens</em>) were surveyed to catalog and compare EF diversity. Molecular sequencing (ITS 1–4) and culturing identified 21 fungal genera: 95.6 % Ascomycota and 4.4 % Basidiomycota. <em>Fusarium</em> spp. were isolated from all sample sets (36–63 % relative abundance), while <em>Botryosphaeria dothidea</em> (9–11 %), <em>Cladosporium</em> sp. (11–13 %), <em>Alternaria</em> sp. (4 %), and <em>Clonostachys</em> sp. (2–6 %) were most abundant in gall samples. <em>Botryosphaeria dothidea</em> was found in both gall-lining and non-gall tissues of <em>B. frutescens</em>. Gall EF diversity was significantly higher in <em>B. frutescens</em> (p < 0.000573). Future research should explore how host-switching or post-associational barriers might influence EF transmission or communities. Further understanding these associations will inform broader studies on EF distributions and myco-phytophagous insect life cycles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55136,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Ecology","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 101441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endophytic fungal diversity within galls induced by Asphondylia borrichiae (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and their surrounding host tissues (Borrichia frutescens and Iva frutescens)\",\"authors\":\"Shannon L. Sharpe, Dale Casamatta, Anthony Rossi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.funeco.2025.101441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Asphondylia borrichiae</em> gall midges deposit endophytic fungi (EF) during oviposition. However, their fungal associations, EF diversity across host plants, and potential interactions between them all remain poorly understood. Galls and tissues from two hosts (<em>Borrichia frutescens</em> and <em>Iva frutescens</em>) were surveyed to catalog and compare EF diversity. Molecular sequencing (ITS 1–4) and culturing identified 21 fungal genera: 95.6 % Ascomycota and 4.4 % Basidiomycota. <em>Fusarium</em> spp. were isolated from all sample sets (36–63 % relative abundance), while <em>Botryosphaeria dothidea</em> (9–11 %), <em>Cladosporium</em> sp. (11–13 %), <em>Alternaria</em> sp. (4 %), and <em>Clonostachys</em> sp. (2–6 %) were most abundant in gall samples. <em>Botryosphaeria dothidea</em> was found in both gall-lining and non-gall tissues of <em>B. frutescens</em>. Gall EF diversity was significantly higher in <em>B. frutescens</em> (p < 0.000573). Future research should explore how host-switching or post-associational barriers might influence EF transmission or communities. Further understanding these associations will inform broader studies on EF distributions and myco-phytophagous insect life cycles.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fungal Ecology\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fungal Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1754504825000315\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fungal Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1754504825000315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Endophytic fungal diversity within galls induced by Asphondylia borrichiae (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and their surrounding host tissues (Borrichia frutescens and Iva frutescens)
Asphondylia borrichiae gall midges deposit endophytic fungi (EF) during oviposition. However, their fungal associations, EF diversity across host plants, and potential interactions between them all remain poorly understood. Galls and tissues from two hosts (Borrichia frutescens and Iva frutescens) were surveyed to catalog and compare EF diversity. Molecular sequencing (ITS 1–4) and culturing identified 21 fungal genera: 95.6 % Ascomycota and 4.4 % Basidiomycota. Fusarium spp. were isolated from all sample sets (36–63 % relative abundance), while Botryosphaeria dothidea (9–11 %), Cladosporium sp. (11–13 %), Alternaria sp. (4 %), and Clonostachys sp. (2–6 %) were most abundant in gall samples. Botryosphaeria dothidea was found in both gall-lining and non-gall tissues of B. frutescens. Gall EF diversity was significantly higher in B. frutescens (p < 0.000573). Future research should explore how host-switching or post-associational barriers might influence EF transmission or communities. Further understanding these associations will inform broader studies on EF distributions and myco-phytophagous insect life cycles.
期刊介绍:
Fungal Ecology publishes investigations into all aspects of fungal ecology, including the following (not exclusive): population dynamics; adaptation; evolution; role in ecosystem functioning, nutrient cycling, decomposition, carbon allocation; ecophysiology; intra- and inter-specific mycelial interactions, fungus-plant (pathogens, mycorrhizas, lichens, endophytes), fungus-invertebrate and fungus-microbe interaction; genomics and (evolutionary) genetics; conservation and biodiversity; remote sensing; bioremediation and biodegradation; quantitative and computational aspects - modelling, indicators, complexity, informatics. The usual prerequisites for publication will be originality, clarity, and significance as relevant to a better understanding of the ecology of fungi.