Ben Bartlett , Matheus Santos , Petar Trslic , Gerard Dooly
{"title":"支持海上风电发展:在数字航空调查中自动化数据分析,以加强野生动物保护和调查效率","authors":"Ben Bartlett , Matheus Santos , Petar Trslic , Gerard Dooly","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With Europe projected to install 260 GW of new wind power between 2024 and 2030, much of it offshore, efficient Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) are essential. Regulations require 24 monthly aerial digital surveys before development, with continued monitoring during and after construction. This generates massive volumes of ecological data. We present an automated system that drastically reduces the time required for the most labour-intensive task: screening imagery to identify objects or individuals for further species classification. The process is reduced from several months to the 4-hour survey duration. In a 15-month case study (with one month excluded for testing), the system achieved 97.9 % accuracy, outperforming manual screening (68.75 %), and eliminated 99.13 % of frames from requiring manual review. Avian detection matched manual performance but remained limited by current survey conditions and image resolution. Critically, we found that the commonly assumed 2 cm ground sampling distance (GSD) was inconsistent across survey frames, with no part of any image achieving 2 cm/px, due to camera angles and aircraft configuration. This reduces classification confidence and highlights a need for improved data standards and transparency. As the first study to directly examine these assumptions using raw data, our results demonstrate that survey resolution is insufficient for consistent species identification, and that manual screening may miss up to 30 % of individuals. These findings underscore the importance of questioning inherited data assumptions and improving survey methodologies before such outputs are used to inform policy or conservation action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51024,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Informatics","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 103242"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting offshore wind growth: Automating data analysis in digital aerial surveys to enhance wildlife protection and survey efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Ben Bartlett , Matheus Santos , Petar Trslic , Gerard Dooly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With Europe projected to install 260 GW of new wind power between 2024 and 2030, much of it offshore, efficient Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) are essential. Regulations require 24 monthly aerial digital surveys before development, with continued monitoring during and after construction. This generates massive volumes of ecological data. We present an automated system that drastically reduces the time required for the most labour-intensive task: screening imagery to identify objects or individuals for further species classification. The process is reduced from several months to the 4-hour survey duration. In a 15-month case study (with one month excluded for testing), the system achieved 97.9 % accuracy, outperforming manual screening (68.75 %), and eliminated 99.13 % of frames from requiring manual review. Avian detection matched manual performance but remained limited by current survey conditions and image resolution. Critically, we found that the commonly assumed 2 cm ground sampling distance (GSD) was inconsistent across survey frames, with no part of any image achieving 2 cm/px, due to camera angles and aircraft configuration. This reduces classification confidence and highlights a need for improved data standards and transparency. As the first study to directly examine these assumptions using raw data, our results demonstrate that survey resolution is insufficient for consistent species identification, and that manual screening may miss up to 30 % of individuals. These findings underscore the importance of questioning inherited data assumptions and improving survey methodologies before such outputs are used to inform policy or conservation action.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Informatics\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954125002511\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954125002511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Supporting offshore wind growth: Automating data analysis in digital aerial surveys to enhance wildlife protection and survey efficiency
With Europe projected to install 260 GW of new wind power between 2024 and 2030, much of it offshore, efficient Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) are essential. Regulations require 24 monthly aerial digital surveys before development, with continued monitoring during and after construction. This generates massive volumes of ecological data. We present an automated system that drastically reduces the time required for the most labour-intensive task: screening imagery to identify objects or individuals for further species classification. The process is reduced from several months to the 4-hour survey duration. In a 15-month case study (with one month excluded for testing), the system achieved 97.9 % accuracy, outperforming manual screening (68.75 %), and eliminated 99.13 % of frames from requiring manual review. Avian detection matched manual performance but remained limited by current survey conditions and image resolution. Critically, we found that the commonly assumed 2 cm ground sampling distance (GSD) was inconsistent across survey frames, with no part of any image achieving 2 cm/px, due to camera angles and aircraft configuration. This reduces classification confidence and highlights a need for improved data standards and transparency. As the first study to directly examine these assumptions using raw data, our results demonstrate that survey resolution is insufficient for consistent species identification, and that manual screening may miss up to 30 % of individuals. These findings underscore the importance of questioning inherited data assumptions and improving survey methodologies before such outputs are used to inform policy or conservation action.
期刊介绍:
The journal Ecological Informatics is devoted to the publication of high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of computational ecology, data science and biogeography. The scope of the journal takes into account the data-intensive nature of ecology, the growing capacity of information technology to access, harness and leverage complex data as well as the critical need for informing sustainable management in view of global environmental and climate change.
The nature of the journal is interdisciplinary at the crossover between ecology and informatics. It focuses on novel concepts and techniques for image- and genome-based monitoring and interpretation, sensor- and multimedia-based data acquisition, internet-based data archiving and sharing, data assimilation, modelling and prediction of ecological data.