用无创压力-容量环路评价左束支区起搏时的心脏能量学

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Naoya Inoue MD , Shuji Morikawa MD , Yuji Ito MD , Yohei Takayama MD , Takehiro Hiramatsu MD , Ryo Ohinata MD , Daiki Okamoto MD , Toyoaki Murohara MD, PhD
{"title":"用无创压力-容量环路评价左束支区起搏时的心脏能量学","authors":"Naoya Inoue MD ,&nbsp;Shuji Morikawa MD ,&nbsp;Yuji Ito MD ,&nbsp;Yohei Takayama MD ,&nbsp;Takehiro Hiramatsu MD ,&nbsp;Ryo Ohinata MD ,&nbsp;Daiki Okamoto MD ,&nbsp;Toyoaki Murohara MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Conduction system pacing, particularly left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), is emerging as the preferred strategy for bradyarrhythmias and cardiac resynchronization therapy because of its clinical benefits. However, the differences in the impact of LBBAP vs right ventricular pacing (RVP) on cardiac energetics remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of LBBAP and RVP on cardiac energetics using a novel noninvasive pressure–volume (PV) loop algorithm derived from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included patients who underwent permanent pacemaker implantation with LBBAP or RVP between January 2021 and October 2024, followed by CMR imaging. Noninvasive PV loops were calculated using volumes derived from CMR and a time-varying elastance model. The parameters obtained from the PV loop analysis were compared between the LBBAP and RVP groups. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (3–40 mm Hg) and excluding anodal pacing cases.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 235 patients, 15 were analyzed (LBBAP group, n = 7; RVP group, n = 8). The end-systolic PV relationship was significantly higher in the LBBAP group (2.25 mm Hg/mL [1.85–2.55]) compared to the RVP group (1.39 mm Hg/mL [1.33–1.69]; <em>P</em> &lt;.0001). The potential energy and PV area were significantly lower in the LBBAP group (<em>P</em> = .0006 and <em>P</em> = .006, respectively), whereas the ventricular efficiency was significantly higher (63.1% vs 57.4%; <em>P</em> = .006).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LBBAP reduces myocardial energy consumption and improves ventricular efficiency compared with RVP, suggesting its advantages in pacing-associated cardiac energetics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 6","pages":"Pages 789-798"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of cardiac energetics in left bundle branch area pacing using noninvasive pressure–volume loops\",\"authors\":\"Naoya Inoue MD ,&nbsp;Shuji Morikawa MD ,&nbsp;Yuji Ito MD ,&nbsp;Yohei Takayama MD ,&nbsp;Takehiro Hiramatsu MD ,&nbsp;Ryo Ohinata MD ,&nbsp;Daiki Okamoto MD ,&nbsp;Toyoaki Murohara MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.03.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Conduction system pacing, particularly left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), is emerging as the preferred strategy for bradyarrhythmias and cardiac resynchronization therapy because of its clinical benefits. However, the differences in the impact of LBBAP vs right ventricular pacing (RVP) on cardiac energetics remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of LBBAP and RVP on cardiac energetics using a novel noninvasive pressure–volume (PV) loop algorithm derived from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included patients who underwent permanent pacemaker implantation with LBBAP or RVP between January 2021 and October 2024, followed by CMR imaging. Noninvasive PV loops were calculated using volumes derived from CMR and a time-varying elastance model. The parameters obtained from the PV loop analysis were compared between the LBBAP and RVP groups. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (3–40 mm Hg) and excluding anodal pacing cases.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 235 patients, 15 were analyzed (LBBAP group, n = 7; RVP group, n = 8). The end-systolic PV relationship was significantly higher in the LBBAP group (2.25 mm Hg/mL [1.85–2.55]) compared to the RVP group (1.39 mm Hg/mL [1.33–1.69]; <em>P</em> &lt;.0001). The potential energy and PV area were significantly lower in the LBBAP group (<em>P</em> = .0006 and <em>P</em> = .006, respectively), whereas the ventricular efficiency was significantly higher (63.1% vs 57.4%; <em>P</em> = .006).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LBBAP reduces myocardial energy consumption and improves ventricular efficiency compared with RVP, suggesting its advantages in pacing-associated cardiac energetics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 789-798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501825001011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501825001011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传导系统起搏,特别是左束支区起搏(LBBAP),由于其临床益处,正逐渐成为慢速心律失常和心脏再同步化治疗的首选策略。然而,LBBAP与右心室起搏(RVP)对心脏能量学的影响差异尚不清楚。目的采用基于心脏磁共振(CMR)的新型无创压力-容积(PV)环路算法,比较LBBAP和RVP对心脏能量学的影响。方法我们纳入了2021年1月至2024年10月期间接受LBBAP或RVP永久性起搏器植入的患者,随后进行了CMR成像。利用CMR和时变弹性模型得出的体积计算无创PV回路。比较LBBAP组和RVP组PV环分析得到的参数。通过改变左室舒张末期压(3-40 mm Hg)并排除阳极起搏病例,进行敏感性分析。结果235例患者中,分析15例(LBBAP组,n = 7;RVP组,n = 8)。与RVP组(1.39 mm Hg/mL[1.33-1.69])相比,LBBAP组(2.25 mm Hg/mL[1.85-2.55])的收缩期末期PV关系显著更高;P & lt;。)。LBBAP组的势能和PV面积显著低于LBBAP组(P = 0.0006和P = 0.006),而心室效率显著高于LBBAP组(63.1% vs 57.4%;P = .006)。结论与RVP相比,lbbap可降低心肌能量消耗,提高心室效率,显示其在起搏相关心脏能量学方面的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of cardiac energetics in left bundle branch area pacing using noninvasive pressure–volume loops

Evaluation of cardiac energetics in left bundle branch area pacing using noninvasive pressure–volume loops

Background

Conduction system pacing, particularly left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), is emerging as the preferred strategy for bradyarrhythmias and cardiac resynchronization therapy because of its clinical benefits. However, the differences in the impact of LBBAP vs right ventricular pacing (RVP) on cardiac energetics remain unclear.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of LBBAP and RVP on cardiac energetics using a novel noninvasive pressure–volume (PV) loop algorithm derived from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).

Methods

We included patients who underwent permanent pacemaker implantation with LBBAP or RVP between January 2021 and October 2024, followed by CMR imaging. Noninvasive PV loops were calculated using volumes derived from CMR and a time-varying elastance model. The parameters obtained from the PV loop analysis were compared between the LBBAP and RVP groups. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (3–40 mm Hg) and excluding anodal pacing cases.

Results

Of the 235 patients, 15 were analyzed (LBBAP group, n = 7; RVP group, n = 8). The end-systolic PV relationship was significantly higher in the LBBAP group (2.25 mm Hg/mL [1.85–2.55]) compared to the RVP group (1.39 mm Hg/mL [1.33–1.69]; P <.0001). The potential energy and PV area were significantly lower in the LBBAP group (P = .0006 and P = .006, respectively), whereas the ventricular efficiency was significantly higher (63.1% vs 57.4%; P = .006).

Conclusion

LBBAP reduces myocardial energy consumption and improves ventricular efficiency compared with RVP, suggesting its advantages in pacing-associated cardiac energetics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信