{"title":"开发流动化学制造设备的经验教训","authors":"Hirotsugu Usutani*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.oprd.5c0008210.1021/acs.oprd.5c00082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Specific designs are necessary when installing manufacturing facilities for active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) plants, especially for scaling up manufacturing using flow chemistry. Each flow reactor is a device focused on an intended reaction. However, due to the required heat exchange (heating or cooling), the parts responsible for carrying out the reactions (the flow reactor itself) are often enclosed in a jacket or setup in a way that makes it difficult to verify the internal structure from the external view. In this paper, we present a case where a piping error made during the installation of a flow system, designed for oxidation reactions with heating, led to a subsequent manufacturing failure, as the error went undetected before operation was started. In retrospect, it would have been possible to identify the piping error ahead of starting manufacture, based on data, such as the internal pressures, obtained during the premanufacturing test. Specifically, the mistake highlighted the importance of identifying the flow lines with ″synchronized internal pressures″ and prediction of the flow lines where the internal pressure is expected to be at its highest or lowest. It is thought that our observations regarding the failure offer an example for OPR&D’s special issue on ‘Lessons Learned in Organic Process Chemistry’ and the details will be disclosed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55,"journal":{"name":"Organic Process Research & Development","volume":"29 6","pages":"1486–1494 1486–1494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons Learned in Developing a Manufacturing Facility for Flow Chemistry\",\"authors\":\"Hirotsugu Usutani*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.oprd.5c0008210.1021/acs.oprd.5c00082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Specific designs are necessary when installing manufacturing facilities for active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) plants, especially for scaling up manufacturing using flow chemistry. Each flow reactor is a device focused on an intended reaction. However, due to the required heat exchange (heating or cooling), the parts responsible for carrying out the reactions (the flow reactor itself) are often enclosed in a jacket or setup in a way that makes it difficult to verify the internal structure from the external view. In this paper, we present a case where a piping error made during the installation of a flow system, designed for oxidation reactions with heating, led to a subsequent manufacturing failure, as the error went undetected before operation was started. In retrospect, it would have been possible to identify the piping error ahead of starting manufacture, based on data, such as the internal pressures, obtained during the premanufacturing test. Specifically, the mistake highlighted the importance of identifying the flow lines with ″synchronized internal pressures″ and prediction of the flow lines where the internal pressure is expected to be at its highest or lowest. It is thought that our observations regarding the failure offer an example for OPR&D’s special issue on ‘Lessons Learned in Organic Process Chemistry’ and the details will be disclosed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organic Process Research & Development\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"1486–1494 1486–1494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organic Process Research & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.5c00082\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organic Process Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.5c00082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lessons Learned in Developing a Manufacturing Facility for Flow Chemistry
Specific designs are necessary when installing manufacturing facilities for active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) plants, especially for scaling up manufacturing using flow chemistry. Each flow reactor is a device focused on an intended reaction. However, due to the required heat exchange (heating or cooling), the parts responsible for carrying out the reactions (the flow reactor itself) are often enclosed in a jacket or setup in a way that makes it difficult to verify the internal structure from the external view. In this paper, we present a case where a piping error made during the installation of a flow system, designed for oxidation reactions with heating, led to a subsequent manufacturing failure, as the error went undetected before operation was started. In retrospect, it would have been possible to identify the piping error ahead of starting manufacture, based on data, such as the internal pressures, obtained during the premanufacturing test. Specifically, the mistake highlighted the importance of identifying the flow lines with ″synchronized internal pressures″ and prediction of the flow lines where the internal pressure is expected to be at its highest or lowest. It is thought that our observations regarding the failure offer an example for OPR&D’s special issue on ‘Lessons Learned in Organic Process Chemistry’ and the details will be disclosed.
期刊介绍:
The journal Organic Process Research & Development serves as a communication tool between industrial chemists and chemists working in universities and research institutes. As such, it reports original work from the broad field of industrial process chemistry but also presents academic results that are relevant, or potentially relevant, to industrial applications. Process chemistry is the science that enables the safe, environmentally benign and ultimately economical manufacturing of organic compounds that are required in larger amounts to help address the needs of society. Consequently, the Journal encompasses every aspect of organic chemistry, including all aspects of catalysis, synthetic methodology development and synthetic strategy exploration, but also includes aspects from analytical and solid-state chemistry and chemical engineering, such as work-up tools,process safety, or flow-chemistry. The goal of development and optimization of chemical reactions and processes is their transfer to a larger scale; original work describing such studies and the actual implementation on scale is highly relevant to the journal. However, studies on new developments from either industry, research institutes or academia that have not yet been demonstrated on scale, but where an industrial utility can be expected and where the study has addressed important prerequisites for a scale-up and has given confidence into the reliability and practicality of the chemistry, also serve the mission of OPR&D as a communication tool between the different contributors to the field.