T A Gootzen,M P Steenbeek,M M H J van Gelder,M H D van Bommel,J N H Timmer-Bonte,C M Kets,R Nitecki Wilke,E M Swisher,B M Norquist,K H Lu,,R P M G Hermens,J A de Hullu
{"title":"TUBA-WISP-II研究中乳腺癌病史对卵巢癌降低风险手术决策的影响","authors":"T A Gootzen,M P Steenbeek,M M H J van Gelder,M H D van Bommel,J N H Timmer-Bonte,C M Kets,R Nitecki Wilke,E M Swisher,B M Norquist,K H Lu,,R P M G Hermens,J A de Hullu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.06.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nFemale BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers have an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. In the TUBA-WISP II study, women choose between standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy to prevent ovarian cancer. At inclusion, a significant proportion of the enrolled women had a history of breast cancer, which could impact decision-making.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nThis study aimed to describe decision-making regarding type and timing of risk-reducing surgery among women with versus without a history of breast cancer.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nPremenopausal BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers completed web-based questionnaires on their personal histories and preferred risk-reducing strategy. Differences in type and timing of first risk-reducing surgery in women with versus without a history of breast cancer were assessed. A multivariable analysis was conducted to examine personal, environmental, and breast cancer related characteristics associated with the choice for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women with a history of breast cancer.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe included 1676 women, of whom 222 (13.2%) had a history of breast cancer. Of those, 77.0% chose RRS/DO, compared to 78.0% in the non- history of breast cancer group (p=0.73). Individuals with breast cancer before their BRCA1/2 diagnosis had their first surgery median 2 years later than women who were diagnosed simultaneously or had their BRCA1/2 diagnosis first. Women diagnosed with breast cancer within the guideline age range for completing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (35-40 BRCA1, 40-45 BRCA2) more often chose risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy than women before the guideline age range, odds ratio 6.2 (95%CI 1.9-19.9).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nA history of breast cancer was not associated with preference for a specific risk-reducing strategy. Women diagnosed with breast cancer in the guideline age range more often chose risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy than women diagnosed before the guideline age range.","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of breast cancer history on decision-making for ovarian cancer risk-reducing surgery in the TUBA-WISP-II study.\",\"authors\":\"T A Gootzen,M P Steenbeek,M M H J van Gelder,M H D van Bommel,J N H Timmer-Bonte,C M Kets,R Nitecki Wilke,E M Swisher,B M Norquist,K H Lu,,R P M G Hermens,J A de Hullu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.06.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nFemale BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers have an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. In the TUBA-WISP II study, women choose between standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy to prevent ovarian cancer. At inclusion, a significant proportion of the enrolled women had a history of breast cancer, which could impact decision-making.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nThis study aimed to describe decision-making regarding type and timing of risk-reducing surgery among women with versus without a history of breast cancer.\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY DESIGN\\r\\nPremenopausal BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers completed web-based questionnaires on their personal histories and preferred risk-reducing strategy. Differences in type and timing of first risk-reducing surgery in women with versus without a history of breast cancer were assessed. A multivariable analysis was conducted to examine personal, environmental, and breast cancer related characteristics associated with the choice for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women with a history of breast cancer.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nWe included 1676 women, of whom 222 (13.2%) had a history of breast cancer. Of those, 77.0% chose RRS/DO, compared to 78.0% in the non- history of breast cancer group (p=0.73). Individuals with breast cancer before their BRCA1/2 diagnosis had their first surgery median 2 years later than women who were diagnosed simultaneously or had their BRCA1/2 diagnosis first. Women diagnosed with breast cancer within the guideline age range for completing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (35-40 BRCA1, 40-45 BRCA2) more often chose risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy than women before the guideline age range, odds ratio 6.2 (95%CI 1.9-19.9).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nA history of breast cancer was not associated with preference for a specific risk-reducing strategy. Women diagnosed with breast cancer in the guideline age range more often chose risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy than women diagnosed before the guideline age range.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.06.024\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.06.024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of breast cancer history on decision-making for ovarian cancer risk-reducing surgery in the TUBA-WISP-II study.
BACKGROUND
Female BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers have an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. In the TUBA-WISP II study, women choose between standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy to prevent ovarian cancer. At inclusion, a significant proportion of the enrolled women had a history of breast cancer, which could impact decision-making.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to describe decision-making regarding type and timing of risk-reducing surgery among women with versus without a history of breast cancer.
STUDY DESIGN
Premenopausal BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers completed web-based questionnaires on their personal histories and preferred risk-reducing strategy. Differences in type and timing of first risk-reducing surgery in women with versus without a history of breast cancer were assessed. A multivariable analysis was conducted to examine personal, environmental, and breast cancer related characteristics associated with the choice for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women with a history of breast cancer.
RESULTS
We included 1676 women, of whom 222 (13.2%) had a history of breast cancer. Of those, 77.0% chose RRS/DO, compared to 78.0% in the non- history of breast cancer group (p=0.73). Individuals with breast cancer before their BRCA1/2 diagnosis had their first surgery median 2 years later than women who were diagnosed simultaneously or had their BRCA1/2 diagnosis first. Women diagnosed with breast cancer within the guideline age range for completing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (35-40 BRCA1, 40-45 BRCA2) more often chose risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy than women before the guideline age range, odds ratio 6.2 (95%CI 1.9-19.9).
CONCLUSION
A history of breast cancer was not associated with preference for a specific risk-reducing strategy. Women diagnosed with breast cancer in the guideline age range more often chose risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy than women diagnosed before the guideline age range.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare.
Focus Areas:
Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders.
Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases.
Content Types:
Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles.
Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology.
Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field.
Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews.
Peer Review Process:
All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.