Chad A Newton,Ashwatha Thenappan,Gabrielle Y Liu,Leda Yazbeck,Cathryn T Lee,Janelle Vu Pugashetti,Jennifer M Wang,Ethan White,Kevin R Flaherty,Elizabeth A Belloli,Jamie S Sheth,Nisha Mohan,Nazanin Nazemi,Andrew R Yu,Sahand Ghodrati,Kerri A Johannson,Veronica Marcoux,Jolene H Fisher,Deborah Assayag,Helene Manganas,Nasreen Khalil,Martin Kolb,Julie Morisset,Christine Kim Garcia,Felix Chua,Mary E Strek,Yet H Khor,Ayodeji Adegunsoye,Christopher J Ryerson,Philip L Molyneaux,Justin M Oldham
{"title":"进行性肺纤维化生理指标的表现特点。","authors":"Chad A Newton,Ashwatha Thenappan,Gabrielle Y Liu,Leda Yazbeck,Cathryn T Lee,Janelle Vu Pugashetti,Jennifer M Wang,Ethan White,Kevin R Flaherty,Elizabeth A Belloli,Jamie S Sheth,Nisha Mohan,Nazanin Nazemi,Andrew R Yu,Sahand Ghodrati,Kerri A Johannson,Veronica Marcoux,Jolene H Fisher,Deborah Assayag,Helene Manganas,Nasreen Khalil,Martin Kolb,Julie Morisset,Christine Kim Garcia,Felix Chua,Mary E Strek,Yet H Khor,Ayodeji Adegunsoye,Christopher J Ryerson,Philip L Molyneaux,Justin M Oldham","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202501-0317oc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE\r\nClinical measures of progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) have been proposed, but their clinical utility remains unclear.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVES\r\nTo determine performance characteristics of lung function-based PPF measures, including new guideline criteria for discriminating clinically relevant outcomes.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA multicenter retrospective cohort analysis was performed to assess the performance characteristics of eight categorical measures of forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion capacity (DLCO) decline, along with PPF guideline criteria (requiring two of the following: worsening respiratory symptoms, absolute decline in FVC ≥5% or DLCO ≥15%, or radiological progression) for discriminating two-year death or lung transplant among fibrotic ILD patients from the United States, United Kingdom and Canada (n=2727). The net benefit of the top performing measures to inform treatment initiation were compared using decision curves.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nPPF classified according to relative decline in FVC of 10%, relative decline in DLCO of 15% and PPF guideline criteria displayed best overall test performance, with area under the receiver operator curves of 0.67-0.68. Specificity was higher than sensitivity for all evaluated measures, with relative measures of lung function decline outperforming absolute measures. The net benefit of stand-alone relative decline in FVC ≥10% and DLCO ≥15% was similar to PPF guideline criteria across the range of treatment probability thresholds.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nClassifying PPF by stand-alone measures of FVC and DLCO decline provides similar clinical utility as PPF guideline criteria. Top performing physiology-based measures of PPF discriminate outcomes with high specificity, but low sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Characteristics for Physiological Measures of Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis.\",\"authors\":\"Chad A Newton,Ashwatha Thenappan,Gabrielle Y Liu,Leda Yazbeck,Cathryn T Lee,Janelle Vu Pugashetti,Jennifer M Wang,Ethan White,Kevin R Flaherty,Elizabeth A Belloli,Jamie S Sheth,Nisha Mohan,Nazanin Nazemi,Andrew R Yu,Sahand Ghodrati,Kerri A Johannson,Veronica Marcoux,Jolene H Fisher,Deborah Assayag,Helene Manganas,Nasreen Khalil,Martin Kolb,Julie Morisset,Christine Kim Garcia,Felix Chua,Mary E Strek,Yet H Khor,Ayodeji Adegunsoye,Christopher J Ryerson,Philip L Molyneaux,Justin M Oldham\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/rccm.202501-0317oc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"RATIONALE\\r\\nClinical measures of progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) have been proposed, but their clinical utility remains unclear.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVES\\r\\nTo determine performance characteristics of lung function-based PPF measures, including new guideline criteria for discriminating clinically relevant outcomes.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA multicenter retrospective cohort analysis was performed to assess the performance characteristics of eight categorical measures of forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion capacity (DLCO) decline, along with PPF guideline criteria (requiring two of the following: worsening respiratory symptoms, absolute decline in FVC ≥5% or DLCO ≥15%, or radiological progression) for discriminating two-year death or lung transplant among fibrotic ILD patients from the United States, United Kingdom and Canada (n=2727). The net benefit of the top performing measures to inform treatment initiation were compared using decision curves.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nPPF classified according to relative decline in FVC of 10%, relative decline in DLCO of 15% and PPF guideline criteria displayed best overall test performance, with area under the receiver operator curves of 0.67-0.68. Specificity was higher than sensitivity for all evaluated measures, with relative measures of lung function decline outperforming absolute measures. The net benefit of stand-alone relative decline in FVC ≥10% and DLCO ≥15% was similar to PPF guideline criteria across the range of treatment probability thresholds.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nClassifying PPF by stand-alone measures of FVC and DLCO decline provides similar clinical utility as PPF guideline criteria. Top performing physiology-based measures of PPF discriminate outcomes with high specificity, but low sensitivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202501-0317oc\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202501-0317oc","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance Characteristics for Physiological Measures of Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis.
RATIONALE
Clinical measures of progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) have been proposed, but their clinical utility remains unclear.
OBJECTIVES
To determine performance characteristics of lung function-based PPF measures, including new guideline criteria for discriminating clinically relevant outcomes.
METHODS
A multicenter retrospective cohort analysis was performed to assess the performance characteristics of eight categorical measures of forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion capacity (DLCO) decline, along with PPF guideline criteria (requiring two of the following: worsening respiratory symptoms, absolute decline in FVC ≥5% or DLCO ≥15%, or radiological progression) for discriminating two-year death or lung transplant among fibrotic ILD patients from the United States, United Kingdom and Canada (n=2727). The net benefit of the top performing measures to inform treatment initiation were compared using decision curves.
RESULTS
PPF classified according to relative decline in FVC of 10%, relative decline in DLCO of 15% and PPF guideline criteria displayed best overall test performance, with area under the receiver operator curves of 0.67-0.68. Specificity was higher than sensitivity for all evaluated measures, with relative measures of lung function decline outperforming absolute measures. The net benefit of stand-alone relative decline in FVC ≥10% and DLCO ≥15% was similar to PPF guideline criteria across the range of treatment probability thresholds.
CONCLUSION
Classifying PPF by stand-alone measures of FVC and DLCO decline provides similar clinical utility as PPF guideline criteria. Top performing physiology-based measures of PPF discriminate outcomes with high specificity, but low sensitivity.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.