Felipe G. Camacho, Paulo Affonso Latoh de Souza, Nader Mahinpey
{"title":"三种渗碳循环重整制氢方案的技术经济评价","authors":"Felipe G. Camacho, Paulo Affonso Latoh de Souza, Nader Mahinpey","doi":"10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the economic viability of carburization reactions as a novel approach for chemical looping reforming using transition metal oxides, particularly tungsten, to produce hydrogen from natural gas. Three process routes are assessed based on capital investment, operating costs, and hydrogen production expenses, supported by sensitivity analysis. The first route (CS) uses air as the combustion agent; the second (ASU-CS) employs air separation units to provide high-purity oxygen; and the third (CS-CCU) adds a carbon capture unit to the CS system. Among them, ASU-CS proves to be the most cost-effective, reducing hydrogen production costs by an average of 48.53% compared to the other routes. When benchmarked against Steam Methane Reforming with 85% carbon capture, the ASU-CS pathway shows a 49.30% cost reduction, particularly when carbon costs are excluded. These findings highlight the economic potential of integrating carburization reactions into reforming processes to advance more sustainable hydrogen production technologies.","PeriodicalId":39,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-Economic Assessment of Three Different Cases for Hydrogen Production Using Carburization Looping Reforming\",\"authors\":\"Felipe G. Camacho, Paulo Affonso Latoh de Souza, Nader Mahinpey\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study evaluates the economic viability of carburization reactions as a novel approach for chemical looping reforming using transition metal oxides, particularly tungsten, to produce hydrogen from natural gas. Three process routes are assessed based on capital investment, operating costs, and hydrogen production expenses, supported by sensitivity analysis. The first route (CS) uses air as the combustion agent; the second (ASU-CS) employs air separation units to provide high-purity oxygen; and the third (CS-CCU) adds a carbon capture unit to the CS system. Among them, ASU-CS proves to be the most cost-effective, reducing hydrogen production costs by an average of 48.53% compared to the other routes. When benchmarked against Steam Methane Reforming with 85% carbon capture, the ASU-CS pathway shows a 49.30% cost reduction, particularly when carbon costs are excluded. These findings highlight the economic potential of integrating carburization reactions into reforming processes to advance more sustainable hydrogen production technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Techno-Economic Assessment of Three Different Cases for Hydrogen Production Using Carburization Looping Reforming
This study evaluates the economic viability of carburization reactions as a novel approach for chemical looping reforming using transition metal oxides, particularly tungsten, to produce hydrogen from natural gas. Three process routes are assessed based on capital investment, operating costs, and hydrogen production expenses, supported by sensitivity analysis. The first route (CS) uses air as the combustion agent; the second (ASU-CS) employs air separation units to provide high-purity oxygen; and the third (CS-CCU) adds a carbon capture unit to the CS system. Among them, ASU-CS proves to be the most cost-effective, reducing hydrogen production costs by an average of 48.53% compared to the other routes. When benchmarked against Steam Methane Reforming with 85% carbon capture, the ASU-CS pathway shows a 49.30% cost reduction, particularly when carbon costs are excluded. These findings highlight the economic potential of integrating carburization reactions into reforming processes to advance more sustainable hydrogen production technologies.
期刊介绍:
ndustrial & Engineering Chemistry, with variations in title and format, has been published since 1909 by the American Chemical Society. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research is a weekly publication that reports industrial and academic research in the broad fields of applied chemistry and chemical engineering with special focus on fundamentals, processes, and products.