Sanne Werner Moeller Andersen, Nishma Vandvig Hindocha, Iben Poulsen, Henning Schliephake, Simon Storgård Jensen
{"title":"使用抗吸收药物的种植牙患者的颌骨骨坏死范围检讨","authors":"Sanne Werner Moeller Andersen, Nishma Vandvig Hindocha, Iben Poulsen, Henning Schliephake, Simon Storgård Jensen","doi":"10.1111/clr.14453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesPatients receiving antiresorptive medication (AR) for osteoporosis or cancer are at risk of medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ), especially after surgical procedures. Dental implant (DI) placement in high‐dose AR (HDAR) patients is widely discouraged, and thorough counseling is recommended for low‐dose AR (LDAR) patients. However, data on the role of AR type, dose, and duration remain limited. This review evaluates MRONJ associated with DIs, focusing on AR type and accumulated dose, and identifies local and systemic risk factors.Materials and MethodsThis review follows the PCC framework for PRISMA‐ScR, comparing patients on AR who developed DI‐related MRONJ to those who did not, based on the available clinical evidence. A systematic search was conducted on April 13, 2024, in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data; a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data extraction included demographics, primary disease, AR type, dose, treatment duration, DI location, and MRONJ details.ResultsOf 2201 articles, 28 studies were included involving 76 patients with 215 DI (154 in LDAR, 61 in HDAR). The development of MRONJ was reported in 15 studies involving LDAR and four studies on HDAR.ConclusionsEvidence was insufficient to confirm an association between accumulated AR dose and MRONJ associated with DIs. No specific risk factors were identified, emphasizing the need for standardized reporting on AR type, dosage, treatment duration, and intervals to facilitate comprehensive risk assessment. Until evidence‐based guidelines emerge, DI therapy in HDAR or long‐term LDAR patients should be limited to specialized centers.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medication‐Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws in Patients on Antiresorptive Medication With Dental Implants. A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Sanne Werner Moeller Andersen, Nishma Vandvig Hindocha, Iben Poulsen, Henning Schliephake, Simon Storgård Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/clr.14453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectivesPatients receiving antiresorptive medication (AR) for osteoporosis or cancer are at risk of medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ), especially after surgical procedures. Dental implant (DI) placement in high‐dose AR (HDAR) patients is widely discouraged, and thorough counseling is recommended for low‐dose AR (LDAR) patients. However, data on the role of AR type, dose, and duration remain limited. This review evaluates MRONJ associated with DIs, focusing on AR type and accumulated dose, and identifies local and systemic risk factors.Materials and MethodsThis review follows the PCC framework for PRISMA‐ScR, comparing patients on AR who developed DI‐related MRONJ to those who did not, based on the available clinical evidence. A systematic search was conducted on April 13, 2024, in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data; a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data extraction included demographics, primary disease, AR type, dose, treatment duration, DI location, and MRONJ details.ResultsOf 2201 articles, 28 studies were included involving 76 patients with 215 DI (154 in LDAR, 61 in HDAR). The development of MRONJ was reported in 15 studies involving LDAR and four studies on HDAR.ConclusionsEvidence was insufficient to confirm an association between accumulated AR dose and MRONJ associated with DIs. No specific risk factors were identified, emphasizing the need for standardized reporting on AR type, dosage, treatment duration, and intervals to facilitate comprehensive risk assessment. Until evidence‐based guidelines emerge, DI therapy in HDAR or long‐term LDAR patients should be limited to specialized centers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14453\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14453","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Medication‐Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws in Patients on Antiresorptive Medication With Dental Implants. A Scoping Review
ObjectivesPatients receiving antiresorptive medication (AR) for osteoporosis or cancer are at risk of medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ), especially after surgical procedures. Dental implant (DI) placement in high‐dose AR (HDAR) patients is widely discouraged, and thorough counseling is recommended for low‐dose AR (LDAR) patients. However, data on the role of AR type, dose, and duration remain limited. This review evaluates MRONJ associated with DIs, focusing on AR type and accumulated dose, and identifies local and systemic risk factors.Materials and MethodsThis review follows the PCC framework for PRISMA‐ScR, comparing patients on AR who developed DI‐related MRONJ to those who did not, based on the available clinical evidence. A systematic search was conducted on April 13, 2024, in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data; a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data extraction included demographics, primary disease, AR type, dose, treatment duration, DI location, and MRONJ details.ResultsOf 2201 articles, 28 studies were included involving 76 patients with 215 DI (154 in LDAR, 61 in HDAR). The development of MRONJ was reported in 15 studies involving LDAR and four studies on HDAR.ConclusionsEvidence was insufficient to confirm an association between accumulated AR dose and MRONJ associated with DIs. No specific risk factors were identified, emphasizing the need for standardized reporting on AR type, dosage, treatment duration, and intervals to facilitate comprehensive risk assessment. Until evidence‐based guidelines emerge, DI therapy in HDAR or long‐term LDAR patients should be limited to specialized centers.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.