阿片类药物使用障碍:非法制造芬太尼时代患者的经验、知识和偏好。

Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1177/29767342251326339
Sarah Casey, Sydney Mcgovern, Susan Regan, Sarah E Wakeman
{"title":"阿片类药物使用障碍:非法制造芬太尼时代患者的经验、知识和偏好。","authors":"Sarah Casey, Sydney Mcgovern, Susan Regan, Sarah E Wakeman","doi":"10.1177/29767342251326339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF) presence has increased reports of buprenorphine precipitated withdrawal and may impact medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) experiences and preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional survey administered by a clinical research coordinator of adults treated by an addiction consult team or bridge clinic who had prior experience with MOUD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 100 respondents surveyed, 36% identified as female, 11% black, 9% Hispanic, 79% white, 29% had stable housing, 93% used fentanyl, and 65% injected commonly. 51% were currently treated with methadone, 41% were currently treated with sublingual buprenorphine, 12% were currently treated with extended-release buprenorphine, and 1% were currently treated with extended-release naltrexone. Most reported their current MOUD managed withdrawal and cravings well; 83.7% for methadone, 70.4% for sublingual buprenorphine, and 91.7% for extended-release buprenorphine. 75.8% of participants who tried buprenorphine reported ever experiencing precipitated withdrawal. Even so, 43.1% of those not being treated with buprenorphine were willing to start. Two-thirds reported cravings or withdrawal had worsened since IMF and 55% said IMF impacted MOUD decision making; however, 59% did not feel more worried about taking MOUD since IMF. Most (86%) had heard about low-dose buprenorphine initiation, 52.3% of those who had heard of it had tried it, and 57.8% reported positive experiences. 40% had heard of high-dose buprenorphine, 60% of those tried it, and 54.2% had positive experiences. The factors most likely to increase participants' willingness to start MOUD were immediate access (85%), rapid titration (87%), hearing positive things from friends (82%), and getting MOUD from their doctor (63%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite IMF impacting withdrawal, cravings, and MOUD decision making, most patients felt MOUD managed symptoms well. Experiences with alternative buprenorphine initiations were positive. Access to low-barrier treatment with immediate medication initiation, aggressive dose escalation, office-based treatment, and peer-based messaging around MOUD may increase treatment uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":"46 3","pages":"695-703"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medications for Opioid Use Disorder: Patients' Experience, Knowledge, and Preferences in the Era of Illicitly Manufactured Fentanyl.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Casey, Sydney Mcgovern, Susan Regan, Sarah E Wakeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/29767342251326339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF) presence has increased reports of buprenorphine precipitated withdrawal and may impact medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) experiences and preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional survey administered by a clinical research coordinator of adults treated by an addiction consult team or bridge clinic who had prior experience with MOUD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 100 respondents surveyed, 36% identified as female, 11% black, 9% Hispanic, 79% white, 29% had stable housing, 93% used fentanyl, and 65% injected commonly. 51% were currently treated with methadone, 41% were currently treated with sublingual buprenorphine, 12% were currently treated with extended-release buprenorphine, and 1% were currently treated with extended-release naltrexone. Most reported their current MOUD managed withdrawal and cravings well; 83.7% for methadone, 70.4% for sublingual buprenorphine, and 91.7% for extended-release buprenorphine. 75.8% of participants who tried buprenorphine reported ever experiencing precipitated withdrawal. Even so, 43.1% of those not being treated with buprenorphine were willing to start. Two-thirds reported cravings or withdrawal had worsened since IMF and 55% said IMF impacted MOUD decision making; however, 59% did not feel more worried about taking MOUD since IMF. Most (86%) had heard about low-dose buprenorphine initiation, 52.3% of those who had heard of it had tried it, and 57.8% reported positive experiences. 40% had heard of high-dose buprenorphine, 60% of those tried it, and 54.2% had positive experiences. The factors most likely to increase participants' willingness to start MOUD were immediate access (85%), rapid titration (87%), hearing positive things from friends (82%), and getting MOUD from their doctor (63%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite IMF impacting withdrawal, cravings, and MOUD decision making, most patients felt MOUD managed symptoms well. Experiences with alternative buprenorphine initiations were positive. Access to low-barrier treatment with immediate medication initiation, aggressive dose escalation, office-based treatment, and peer-based messaging around MOUD may increase treatment uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance use & addiction journal\",\"volume\":\"46 3\",\"pages\":\"695-703\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance use & addiction journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342251326339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342251326339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非法制造的芬太尼(IMF)的存在增加了丁丙诺啡沉淀戒断的报道,并可能影响阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)的用药体验和偏好。方法:横断面调查由临床研究协调员实施成人治疗成瘾咨询小组或桥诊所谁有吸毒成瘾的经验。结果:在100名被调查者中,女性占36%,黑人占11%,西班牙裔占9%,白人占79%,住房稳定者占29%,使用芬太尼者占93%,普通注射者占65%。51%的患者目前接受美沙酮治疗,41%的患者目前接受舌下丁丙诺啡治疗,12%的患者目前接受丁丙诺啡缓释治疗,1%的患者目前接受纳曲酮缓释治疗。大多数人报告说,他们目前的情绪控制得很好;美沙酮占83.7%,丁丙诺啡占70.4%,丁丙诺啡缓释占91.7%。服用丁丙诺啡的参与者中有75.8%的人报告曾有过突然戒断的经历。即便如此,仍有43.1%的未接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者愿意开始服用丁丙诺啡。三分之二的人表示,自IMF成立以来,对药物的渴望或戒断加剧,55%的人表示IMF影响了国防部的决策;然而,59%的受访者表示,与IMF相比,服用mod并不更加担心。大多数(86%)的人听说过小剂量丁丙诺啡的起始,52.3%的人听说过丁丙诺啡,57.8%的人报告了积极的经历。40%的人听说过大剂量丁丙诺啡,60%的人尝试过,54.2%的人有积极的经历。最有可能增加参与者开始使用mod意愿的因素是立即获得(85%)、快速滴定(87%)、从朋友那里听到积极的事情(82%)和从医生那里获得mod(63%)。结论:尽管IMF影响戒断、渴望和mod决策,但大多数患者认为mod能很好地控制症状。替代丁丙诺啡起始的经验是积极的。通过立即开始用药、积极剂量递增、以办公室为基础的治疗和以同伴为基础的mod信息传递获得低屏障治疗可能会增加治疗的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medications for Opioid Use Disorder: Patients' Experience, Knowledge, and Preferences in the Era of Illicitly Manufactured Fentanyl.

Background: Illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF) presence has increased reports of buprenorphine precipitated withdrawal and may impact medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) experiences and preferences.

Methods: Cross-sectional survey administered by a clinical research coordinator of adults treated by an addiction consult team or bridge clinic who had prior experience with MOUD.

Results: Among 100 respondents surveyed, 36% identified as female, 11% black, 9% Hispanic, 79% white, 29% had stable housing, 93% used fentanyl, and 65% injected commonly. 51% were currently treated with methadone, 41% were currently treated with sublingual buprenorphine, 12% were currently treated with extended-release buprenorphine, and 1% were currently treated with extended-release naltrexone. Most reported their current MOUD managed withdrawal and cravings well; 83.7% for methadone, 70.4% for sublingual buprenorphine, and 91.7% for extended-release buprenorphine. 75.8% of participants who tried buprenorphine reported ever experiencing precipitated withdrawal. Even so, 43.1% of those not being treated with buprenorphine were willing to start. Two-thirds reported cravings or withdrawal had worsened since IMF and 55% said IMF impacted MOUD decision making; however, 59% did not feel more worried about taking MOUD since IMF. Most (86%) had heard about low-dose buprenorphine initiation, 52.3% of those who had heard of it had tried it, and 57.8% reported positive experiences. 40% had heard of high-dose buprenorphine, 60% of those tried it, and 54.2% had positive experiences. The factors most likely to increase participants' willingness to start MOUD were immediate access (85%), rapid titration (87%), hearing positive things from friends (82%), and getting MOUD from their doctor (63%).

Conclusions: Despite IMF impacting withdrawal, cravings, and MOUD decision making, most patients felt MOUD managed symptoms well. Experiences with alternative buprenorphine initiations were positive. Access to low-barrier treatment with immediate medication initiation, aggressive dose escalation, office-based treatment, and peer-based messaging around MOUD may increase treatment uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信