高压球囊扩张在原发性阻塞性血压计婴儿中的应用:单中心病例系列。

0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Anna Suihko, Liisi Ripatti, Niklas Pakkasjärvi
{"title":"高压球囊扩张在原发性阻塞性血压计婴儿中的应用:单中心病例系列。","authors":"Anna Suihko, Liisi Ripatti, Niklas Pakkasjärvi","doi":"10.5152/tud.2025.24045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of high-pressure balloon dilatation (HPBD) for primary obstructive megaureter (POM) treatment in infants. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed medical records of 5 infants diagnosed with symptomatic or progressive POM and treated with HPBD between 2015 and 2022 in one hospital, analyzing changes in ureteral and anteroposterior pelvic diameters, Society for Fetal Urology grading, parenchymal thickness, differential renal function, complications, and subsequent surgical needs. Results: High-pressure balloon dilatation was performed on 5 patients, median age 5 months. No statistically significant changes were detected in ureteral diameter (median 11.0-7.0 mm, P = .125), anteroposterior diameters (median 21.5-18 mm, P= .255), parenchymal thickness (median 5.0-5.0 mm, P = .317), or differential renal function post-procedure. Follow-up was median 34 months. Three patients showed improvement in obstructive renogram findings. Complications were primarily related to guidewire insertion and double-J stent placement. Two patients, both younger than 6 months, required open ureteral reimplantation. Conclusion: High-pressure balloon dilatation serves as a minimally invasive approach for POM but is not universally effective, with a high complication rate and 40% of infants needing open surgery post HPBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":101337,"journal":{"name":"Urology research & practice","volume":"51 2","pages":"70-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-Pressure Balloon Dilatation in Infants with Primary Obstructive Megaureter: A Single-Center Case Series.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Suihko, Liisi Ripatti, Niklas Pakkasjärvi\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/tud.2025.24045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of high-pressure balloon dilatation (HPBD) for primary obstructive megaureter (POM) treatment in infants. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed medical records of 5 infants diagnosed with symptomatic or progressive POM and treated with HPBD between 2015 and 2022 in one hospital, analyzing changes in ureteral and anteroposterior pelvic diameters, Society for Fetal Urology grading, parenchymal thickness, differential renal function, complications, and subsequent surgical needs. Results: High-pressure balloon dilatation was performed on 5 patients, median age 5 months. No statistically significant changes were detected in ureteral diameter (median 11.0-7.0 mm, P = .125), anteroposterior diameters (median 21.5-18 mm, P= .255), parenchymal thickness (median 5.0-5.0 mm, P = .317), or differential renal function post-procedure. Follow-up was median 34 months. Three patients showed improvement in obstructive renogram findings. Complications were primarily related to guidewire insertion and double-J stent placement. Two patients, both younger than 6 months, required open ureteral reimplantation. Conclusion: High-pressure balloon dilatation serves as a minimally invasive approach for POM but is not universally effective, with a high complication rate and 40% of infants needing open surgery post HPBD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology research & practice\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"70-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology research & practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2025.24045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology research & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2025.24045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价高压球囊扩张术(HPBD)治疗婴儿原发性阻塞性血液计(POM)的疗效。方法:作者回顾性回顾了一家医院2015年至2022年间诊断为症状性或进行性POM并接受HPBD治疗的5例婴儿的医疗记录,分析了输尿管和骨盆前后直径的变化、胎儿泌尿学分级、实质厚度、肾功能差异、并发症和后续手术需求。结果:高压球囊扩张5例,中位年龄5个月。输尿管直径(中位数11.0-7.0 mm, P= 0.125)、前后直径(中位数21.5-18 mm, P= 0.255)、实质厚度(中位数5.0-5.0 mm, P= 0.317)或术后肾功能差异均无统计学意义变化。随访时间中位数为34个月。3例患者的梗阻性肾造影表现有所改善。并发症主要与导丝置入和双j型支架置入有关。2例患者,均小于6个月,需要开放输尿管再植术。结论:高压球囊扩张是一种微创治疗POM的方法,但并非普遍有效,其并发症发生率高,40%的婴儿HPBD后需要开放手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High-Pressure Balloon Dilatation in Infants with Primary Obstructive Megaureter: A Single-Center Case Series.

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of high-pressure balloon dilatation (HPBD) for primary obstructive megaureter (POM) treatment in infants. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed medical records of 5 infants diagnosed with symptomatic or progressive POM and treated with HPBD between 2015 and 2022 in one hospital, analyzing changes in ureteral and anteroposterior pelvic diameters, Society for Fetal Urology grading, parenchymal thickness, differential renal function, complications, and subsequent surgical needs. Results: High-pressure balloon dilatation was performed on 5 patients, median age 5 months. No statistically significant changes were detected in ureteral diameter (median 11.0-7.0 mm, P = .125), anteroposterior diameters (median 21.5-18 mm, P= .255), parenchymal thickness (median 5.0-5.0 mm, P = .317), or differential renal function post-procedure. Follow-up was median 34 months. Three patients showed improvement in obstructive renogram findings. Complications were primarily related to guidewire insertion and double-J stent placement. Two patients, both younger than 6 months, required open ureteral reimplantation. Conclusion: High-pressure balloon dilatation serves as a minimally invasive approach for POM but is not universally effective, with a high complication rate and 40% of infants needing open surgery post HPBD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信