Ingvild Vøllo Eliassen, Bjørn-Eivind Kirsebom, Knut Waterloo, Ragnhild Eide Skogseth, Gøril Rolfseng Grøntvedt, Mathilde Suhr Hemminghyth, Berglind Gísladóttir, Fernando Gonzalez-Ortiz, Dag Aarsland, Tormod Fladby, Erik Hessen
{"title":"在两年的随访中,认知能力未受损个体的阿尔茨海默病病理生物标志物与认知能力下降无关。","authors":"Ingvild Vøllo Eliassen, Bjørn-Eivind Kirsebom, Knut Waterloo, Ragnhild Eide Skogseth, Gøril Rolfseng Grøntvedt, Mathilde Suhr Hemminghyth, Berglind Gísladóttir, Fernando Gonzalez-Ortiz, Dag Aarsland, Tormod Fladby, Erik Hessen","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2518566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology may be present in cognitively unimpaired individuals, but the clinical implications of this are unclear. Subtle cognitive decline is a potential marker of preclinical AD.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether two-year cognitive change scores are influenced by AD-linked cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ<sub>42/40,</sub> p-tau, t-tau, NfL) or plasma (p217, BD-tau, NfL) biomarker pathology in individuals who are cognitively unimpaired at baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 148 cognitively unimpaired older adults (mean age = 68.11). Mean cognitive change over two years was compared between participants with normal and pathological biomarker status, for each biomarker separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no significant difference between mean change scores in people with abnormal biomarker values compared to normal biomarker groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of baseline CSF biomarker positivity, no significant cognitive change was observed in this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathological biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in cognitively unimpaired individuals are not associated with cognitive decline at two-year follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"Ingvild Vøllo Eliassen, Bjørn-Eivind Kirsebom, Knut Waterloo, Ragnhild Eide Skogseth, Gøril Rolfseng Grøntvedt, Mathilde Suhr Hemminghyth, Berglind Gísladóttir, Fernando Gonzalez-Ortiz, Dag Aarsland, Tormod Fladby, Erik Hessen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2025.2518566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology may be present in cognitively unimpaired individuals, but the clinical implications of this are unclear. Subtle cognitive decline is a potential marker of preclinical AD.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether two-year cognitive change scores are influenced by AD-linked cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ<sub>42/40,</sub> p-tau, t-tau, NfL) or plasma (p217, BD-tau, NfL) biomarker pathology in individuals who are cognitively unimpaired at baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 148 cognitively unimpaired older adults (mean age = 68.11). Mean cognitive change over two years was compared between participants with normal and pathological biomarker status, for each biomarker separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no significant difference between mean change scores in people with abnormal biomarker values compared to normal biomarker groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of baseline CSF biomarker positivity, no significant cognitive change was observed in this group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2518566\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2518566","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pathological biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in cognitively unimpaired individuals are not associated with cognitive decline at two-year follow-up.
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology may be present in cognitively unimpaired individuals, but the clinical implications of this are unclear. Subtle cognitive decline is a potential marker of preclinical AD.
Objective: To investigate whether two-year cognitive change scores are influenced by AD-linked cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ42/40, p-tau, t-tau, NfL) or plasma (p217, BD-tau, NfL) biomarker pathology in individuals who are cognitively unimpaired at baseline.
Methods: Participants were 148 cognitively unimpaired older adults (mean age = 68.11). Mean cognitive change over two years was compared between participants with normal and pathological biomarker status, for each biomarker separately.
Results: We found no significant difference between mean change scores in people with abnormal biomarker values compared to normal biomarker groups.
Conclusion: Regardless of baseline CSF biomarker positivity, no significant cognitive change was observed in this group.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.