从政策到实践:在研究生医学教育中建立残障包容基础设施。

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-16 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000006127
Emily Green, Kelley A Volpe
{"title":"从政策到实践:在研究生医学教育中建立残障包容基础设施。","authors":"Emily Green, Kelley A Volpe","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Disability inclusion in graduate medical education (GME) remains understudied despite its importance for equity and patient care. Recent data reveal a significant attrition of disabled trainees between medical school and practice, with disclosure barriers-such as stigma and unclear policies-compounding the issue. For learners with multiple marginalized identities, such as those underrepresented in medicine and disabled, compounded barriers may exist. While the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has strengthened diversity and accommodation requirements, many GME programs still lack formal disability policies and transparent processes. This case study follows an African American woman psychiatry fellow with ADHD and a reading disorder as she navigates disability accommodations in GME. After successful experiences in undergraduate medical education and residency, she encountered significant challenges in fellowship due to the absence of a clear accommodations process. Her program director and institutional resources were supportive but lacked coordinated protocols, leading to inconsistent, discretionary accommodations that undermined legal protections and caused significant distress. This experience highlights how administrative failures and ableism intersect with other systemic biases, creating barriers to success for disabled trainees. Drawing on this case, the authors recommend establishing formal accommodation protocols, faculty training, legally binding accommodations, peer mentorship networks, and regular policy review. Implementing these recommendations can help GME programs operationalize ACGME's diversity and inclusion standards, ultimately improving equity and retention for disabled trainees. This case illustrates the urgent need for standardized, inclusive policies to ensure disabled physicians-in-training receive the support they need to thrive.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"S184-S187"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Policy to Practice: Building the Disability Inclusion Infrastructure in Graduate Medical Education.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Green, Kelley A Volpe\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Disability inclusion in graduate medical education (GME) remains understudied despite its importance for equity and patient care. Recent data reveal a significant attrition of disabled trainees between medical school and practice, with disclosure barriers-such as stigma and unclear policies-compounding the issue. For learners with multiple marginalized identities, such as those underrepresented in medicine and disabled, compounded barriers may exist. While the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has strengthened diversity and accommodation requirements, many GME programs still lack formal disability policies and transparent processes. This case study follows an African American woman psychiatry fellow with ADHD and a reading disorder as she navigates disability accommodations in GME. After successful experiences in undergraduate medical education and residency, she encountered significant challenges in fellowship due to the absence of a clear accommodations process. Her program director and institutional resources were supportive but lacked coordinated protocols, leading to inconsistent, discretionary accommodations that undermined legal protections and caused significant distress. This experience highlights how administrative failures and ableism intersect with other systemic biases, creating barriers to success for disabled trainees. Drawing on this case, the authors recommend establishing formal accommodation protocols, faculty training, legally binding accommodations, peer mentorship networks, and regular policy review. Implementing these recommendations can help GME programs operationalize ACGME's diversity and inclusion standards, ultimately improving equity and retention for disabled trainees. This case illustrates the urgent need for standardized, inclusive policies to ensure disabled physicians-in-training receive the support they need to thrive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"S184-S187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006127\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:残障包容在研究生医学教育(GME)中仍未得到充分研究,尽管它对公平和患者护理具有重要意义。最近的数据显示,从医学院到实际工作,残疾学员的流失非常严重,而披露障碍——比如耻辱和不明确的政策——使问题更加复杂。对于具有多重边缘身份的学习者,例如在医学和残疾人领域代表性不足的学习者,可能存在复杂的障碍。虽然研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)加强了多样性和住宿要求,但许多GME项目仍然缺乏正式的残疾政策和透明的流程。这个案例研究跟随一位患有多动症和阅读障碍的非裔美国女性精神病学研究员,她在GME的残疾住宿中导航。在本科医学教育和住院医师的成功经历之后,由于缺乏明确的住宿流程,她在奖学金方面遇到了重大挑战。她的项目主管和机构资源是支持的,但缺乏协调的协议,导致不一致的、随意的住宿,破坏了法律保护,造成了巨大的痛苦。这一经历凸显了行政失误和残疾歧视如何与其他系统性偏见交织在一起,为残疾学员的成功创造了障碍。根据这一案例,作者建议建立正式的住宿协议、教员培训、具有法律约束力的住宿、同伴指导网络和定期政策审查。实施这些建议可以帮助残疾人教育培训项目实施残疾人教育培训委员会的多样性和包容性标准,最终提高残疾学员的公平性和留任率。这个案例表明,迫切需要制定标准化、包容性的政策,以确保残疾实习医生得到他们茁壮成长所需的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Policy to Practice: Building the Disability Inclusion Infrastructure in Graduate Medical Education.

Abstract: Disability inclusion in graduate medical education (GME) remains understudied despite its importance for equity and patient care. Recent data reveal a significant attrition of disabled trainees between medical school and practice, with disclosure barriers-such as stigma and unclear policies-compounding the issue. For learners with multiple marginalized identities, such as those underrepresented in medicine and disabled, compounded barriers may exist. While the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has strengthened diversity and accommodation requirements, many GME programs still lack formal disability policies and transparent processes. This case study follows an African American woman psychiatry fellow with ADHD and a reading disorder as she navigates disability accommodations in GME. After successful experiences in undergraduate medical education and residency, she encountered significant challenges in fellowship due to the absence of a clear accommodations process. Her program director and institutional resources were supportive but lacked coordinated protocols, leading to inconsistent, discretionary accommodations that undermined legal protections and caused significant distress. This experience highlights how administrative failures and ableism intersect with other systemic biases, creating barriers to success for disabled trainees. Drawing on this case, the authors recommend establishing formal accommodation protocols, faculty training, legally binding accommodations, peer mentorship networks, and regular policy review. Implementing these recommendations can help GME programs operationalize ACGME's diversity and inclusion standards, ultimately improving equity and retention for disabled trainees. This case illustrates the urgent need for standardized, inclusive policies to ensure disabled physicians-in-training receive the support they need to thrive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信