大麻使用障碍中基于努力的决策的行为和神经生物学评估:初步/初步调查。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Sarah L Brassard, Jadyn Dosanjh, Jessica Cooper, Jochen Weber, David Zald, James MacKillop, Iris M Balodis
{"title":"大麻使用障碍中基于努力的决策的行为和神经生物学评估:初步/初步调查。","authors":"Sarah L Brassard, Jadyn Dosanjh, Jessica Cooper, Jochen Weber, David Zald, James MacKillop, Iris M Balodis","doi":"10.3758/s13415-025-01308-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low motivation for noncannabis rewards is a common clinical feature of cannabis use disorder (CUD), yet its underlying neurobiological mechanisms remain largely unknown. This study applied a sequential effort-based decision-making task during functional magnetic resonance imaging to quantify motivation and test for potential neurofunctional differences during prospective effort/reward encoding (Cue1), integration of effort and reward cues (Cue2), and choice behaviour in individuals with CUD (n = 21) and healthy controls (HCs) (n = 20). Behavioural in-scanner results demonstrated that participants in both groups made significantly fewer high-effort choices as effort levels increased on the task, yet they selected significantly more high-reward choices as reward magnitude increased. At the neural level, the CUD group showed decreased ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity, as well as reduced activity in the culmen, posterior cingulate, and superior temporal gyrus during the encoding of prospective effort and reward cues (Cue1) respectively, compared with controls. Conversely, the CUD group showed increased parietal lobule, superior temporal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, middle occipital gyrus, cingulate gyrus, and claustrum activity during the integration phase of the task (Cue2) relative to controls. Exploratory correlations revealed that bilateral ventral striatum activity during prospective effort cues was associated with the proportion of accepted high-effort and high-reward trials, predominantly driven by the CUD group. Altogether, these findings indicate fronto-striatal but also posterior cortical processing alterations during prospective signaling and during effort-reward information integration. By temporally disconnecting effort expenditure from reward magnitude, the current findings shed light on how these constructs independently and simultaneously influence dysregulated effortful goal-directed choice behaviour in CUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Behavioural and neurobiological assessment of effort-based decision-making in cannabis use disorder: An initial/preliminary investigation.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah L Brassard, Jadyn Dosanjh, Jessica Cooper, Jochen Weber, David Zald, James MacKillop, Iris M Balodis\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13415-025-01308-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Low motivation for noncannabis rewards is a common clinical feature of cannabis use disorder (CUD), yet its underlying neurobiological mechanisms remain largely unknown. This study applied a sequential effort-based decision-making task during functional magnetic resonance imaging to quantify motivation and test for potential neurofunctional differences during prospective effort/reward encoding (Cue1), integration of effort and reward cues (Cue2), and choice behaviour in individuals with CUD (n = 21) and healthy controls (HCs) (n = 20). Behavioural in-scanner results demonstrated that participants in both groups made significantly fewer high-effort choices as effort levels increased on the task, yet they selected significantly more high-reward choices as reward magnitude increased. At the neural level, the CUD group showed decreased ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity, as well as reduced activity in the culmen, posterior cingulate, and superior temporal gyrus during the encoding of prospective effort and reward cues (Cue1) respectively, compared with controls. Conversely, the CUD group showed increased parietal lobule, superior temporal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, middle occipital gyrus, cingulate gyrus, and claustrum activity during the integration phase of the task (Cue2) relative to controls. Exploratory correlations revealed that bilateral ventral striatum activity during prospective effort cues was associated with the proportion of accepted high-effort and high-reward trials, predominantly driven by the CUD group. Altogether, these findings indicate fronto-striatal but also posterior cortical processing alterations during prospective signaling and during effort-reward information integration. By temporally disconnecting effort expenditure from reward magnitude, the current findings shed light on how these constructs independently and simultaneously influence dysregulated effortful goal-directed choice behaviour in CUD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01308-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01308-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非大麻奖励动机低是大麻使用障碍(CUD)的常见临床特征,但其潜在的神经生物学机制在很大程度上仍然未知。本研究在功能磁共振成像期间应用了一个基于顺序努力的决策任务来量化动机,并测试CUD患者(n = 21)和健康对照组(n = 20)在预期努力/奖励编码(Cue1)、努力和奖励线索整合(Cue2)和选择行为方面的潜在神经功能差异。行为扫描结果表明,随着努力程度的增加,两组参与者做出的高努力选择明显减少,但随着奖励程度的增加,他们选择的高回报选择明显增多。在神经水平上,与对照组相比,CUD组在编码预期努力和奖励线索(cu1)时,腹内侧前额叶皮层的活动减少,culmen、后扣带和颞上回的活动分别减少。相反,与对照组相比,CUD组在任务整合阶段的顶叶小叶、颞上回、梭状回、枕中回、扣带回和屏状体活动增加。探索性相关性显示,在预期努力提示时,双侧腹侧纹状体活动与接受高努力和高奖励试验的比例相关,主要由CUD组驱动。总之,这些发现表明,在前瞻性信号传递和努力-奖励信息整合过程中,额纹状体和后皮层加工过程也发生了变化。通过暂时将努力支出与奖励大小分离,目前的研究结果揭示了这些结构如何独立并同时影响CUD中失调的努力目标导向选择行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Behavioural and neurobiological assessment of effort-based decision-making in cannabis use disorder: An initial/preliminary investigation.

Low motivation for noncannabis rewards is a common clinical feature of cannabis use disorder (CUD), yet its underlying neurobiological mechanisms remain largely unknown. This study applied a sequential effort-based decision-making task during functional magnetic resonance imaging to quantify motivation and test for potential neurofunctional differences during prospective effort/reward encoding (Cue1), integration of effort and reward cues (Cue2), and choice behaviour in individuals with CUD (n = 21) and healthy controls (HCs) (n = 20). Behavioural in-scanner results demonstrated that participants in both groups made significantly fewer high-effort choices as effort levels increased on the task, yet they selected significantly more high-reward choices as reward magnitude increased. At the neural level, the CUD group showed decreased ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity, as well as reduced activity in the culmen, posterior cingulate, and superior temporal gyrus during the encoding of prospective effort and reward cues (Cue1) respectively, compared with controls. Conversely, the CUD group showed increased parietal lobule, superior temporal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, middle occipital gyrus, cingulate gyrus, and claustrum activity during the integration phase of the task (Cue2) relative to controls. Exploratory correlations revealed that bilateral ventral striatum activity during prospective effort cues was associated with the proportion of accepted high-effort and high-reward trials, predominantly driven by the CUD group. Altogether, these findings indicate fronto-striatal but also posterior cortical processing alterations during prospective signaling and during effort-reward information integration. By temporally disconnecting effort expenditure from reward magnitude, the current findings shed light on how these constructs independently and simultaneously influence dysregulated effortful goal-directed choice behaviour in CUD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信