情境可预见性对青少年模拟中心暗斑阅读的有益影响。

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Eole Lapeyre, Núria Gala, Aurélie Calabrèse
{"title":"情境可预见性对青少年模拟中心暗斑阅读的有益影响。","authors":"Eole Lapeyre, Núria Gala, Aurélie Calabrèse","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.7.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conflicting results have been reported regarding the effect of word predictability when reading with eccentric vision. The present study aims to shed light on these discrepancies by investigating how in-context word predictability influences reading performance with a simulated scotoma, while considering the visual and lexical features of words. Thirty-five healthy young people read aloud sentences presented using the self-paced reading paradigm. A group of 22 participants practiced reading with a 10° diameter, gaze-contingent simulated central scotoma, with the other group serving as controls. Each participant underwent two in-lab sessions, reading 304 sentences (2-4 hours, depending on their group). Reading time, fixation number, and duration were analyzed for each target word using mixed-effect models. When reading with a simulated scotoma, in-context predictability shows a significant effect on performance, with a 35% decrease in reading time for highly predictable words compared with unpredictable ones (2.5 seconds vs. 1.6 seconds). This effect is modulated by practice, with the decrease dropping to 22% (1.3 seconds vs. 1.0 seconds) after only few hours of scotoma exposure. This effect seems to be driven by the total number of fixations required to identify words and is absent in the control group. These results support the hypothesis that reading with eccentric vision, which limits visual access to text, results in a stronger in-context predictability advantage. Moreover, this effect has a greater impact early in eccentric reading practice. This suggests greater reliance on linguistic inferences to compensate for impaired visual input, compared with central reading, at least until functional adaptation occurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 7","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beneficial influence of in-context predictability when young adults read with a simulated central scotoma.\",\"authors\":\"Eole Lapeyre, Núria Gala, Aurélie Calabrèse\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/jov.25.7.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Conflicting results have been reported regarding the effect of word predictability when reading with eccentric vision. The present study aims to shed light on these discrepancies by investigating how in-context word predictability influences reading performance with a simulated scotoma, while considering the visual and lexical features of words. Thirty-five healthy young people read aloud sentences presented using the self-paced reading paradigm. A group of 22 participants practiced reading with a 10° diameter, gaze-contingent simulated central scotoma, with the other group serving as controls. Each participant underwent two in-lab sessions, reading 304 sentences (2-4 hours, depending on their group). Reading time, fixation number, and duration were analyzed for each target word using mixed-effect models. When reading with a simulated scotoma, in-context predictability shows a significant effect on performance, with a 35% decrease in reading time for highly predictable words compared with unpredictable ones (2.5 seconds vs. 1.6 seconds). This effect is modulated by practice, with the decrease dropping to 22% (1.3 seconds vs. 1.0 seconds) after only few hours of scotoma exposure. This effect seems to be driven by the total number of fixations required to identify words and is absent in the control group. These results support the hypothesis that reading with eccentric vision, which limits visual access to text, results in a stronger in-context predictability advantage. Moreover, this effect has a greater impact early in eccentric reading practice. This suggests greater reliance on linguistic inferences to compensate for impaired visual input, compared with central reading, at least until functional adaptation occurs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"volume\":\"25 7\",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178433/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.7.8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.7.8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在阅读时,关于单词可预见性的影响,已经报道了相互矛盾的结果。本研究的目的是在考虑单词的视觉和词汇特征的情况下,通过研究上下文中单词可预测性如何影响模拟暗点的阅读表现来揭示这些差异。35名健康的年轻人大声朗读使用自定节奏阅读范式呈现的句子。一组22名参与者在直径为10°的模拟中心暗点下练习阅读,另一组作为对照。每个参与者在实验室里进行了两次实验,阅读304个句子(根据他们的小组,阅读时间为2-4小时)。使用混合效应模型分析每个目标词的阅读时间、注视次数和持续时间。当阅读模拟暗点时,上下文可预测性对表现有显著影响,与不可预测的单词相比,高度可预测的单词的阅读时间减少了35%(2.5秒对1.6秒)。这种影响可以通过实践来调节,在暗斑暴露几个小时后,减少到22%(1.3秒对1.0秒)。这种效应似乎是由识别单词所需的注视次数驱动的,而在对照组中则不存在。这些结果支持了一种假设,即具有偏心视觉的阅读限制了对文本的视觉访问,导致了更强的上下文可预测性优势。而且,这种效应在怪癖阅读练习的早期影响更大。这表明,至少在功能适应发生之前,与集中阅读相比,更依赖于语言推理来补偿受损的视觉输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beneficial influence of in-context predictability when young adults read with a simulated central scotoma.

Conflicting results have been reported regarding the effect of word predictability when reading with eccentric vision. The present study aims to shed light on these discrepancies by investigating how in-context word predictability influences reading performance with a simulated scotoma, while considering the visual and lexical features of words. Thirty-five healthy young people read aloud sentences presented using the self-paced reading paradigm. A group of 22 participants practiced reading with a 10° diameter, gaze-contingent simulated central scotoma, with the other group serving as controls. Each participant underwent two in-lab sessions, reading 304 sentences (2-4 hours, depending on their group). Reading time, fixation number, and duration were analyzed for each target word using mixed-effect models. When reading with a simulated scotoma, in-context predictability shows a significant effect on performance, with a 35% decrease in reading time for highly predictable words compared with unpredictable ones (2.5 seconds vs. 1.6 seconds). This effect is modulated by practice, with the decrease dropping to 22% (1.3 seconds vs. 1.0 seconds) after only few hours of scotoma exposure. This effect seems to be driven by the total number of fixations required to identify words and is absent in the control group. These results support the hypothesis that reading with eccentric vision, which limits visual access to text, results in a stronger in-context predictability advantage. Moreover, this effect has a greater impact early in eccentric reading practice. This suggests greater reliance on linguistic inferences to compensate for impaired visual input, compared with central reading, at least until functional adaptation occurs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信