通过使用SimVis Gekko视觉模拟器复制多焦点隐形眼镜的配戴指南来改进多焦点隐形眼镜的配戴。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Eduardo Esteban-Ibañez, Ainhoa Molina-Martín, Elena Martínez-Plaza, Carlos Dorronsoro, Enrique Gambra, David P Piñero
{"title":"通过使用SimVis Gekko视觉模拟器复制多焦点隐形眼镜的配戴指南来改进多焦点隐形眼镜的配戴。","authors":"Eduardo Esteban-Ibañez, Ainhoa Molina-Martín, Elena Martínez-Plaza, Carlos Dorronsoro, Enrique Gambra, David P Piñero","doi":"10.1016/j.clae.2025.102468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of implementing fitting guides for multifocal contact lenses (MCLs) using the SimVis Gekko visual simulator and, through a preliminary assessment with a novel metric (3D-VA, which integrates visual acuity at multiple distances and patient visual needs), determine whether this combined approach can optimise initial MCL selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty presbyopic subjects participated in this study using two methods to select on-eye MCLs from 4 manufacturers: (1) using the first step of the fitting guide, according to the patient's addition need, to provide the MCLs recommended by the manufacturer and, (2) using SimVis Gekko simulations to obtain MCLs providing better 3D-VA, between the first and the first-alternative step of the fitting guides. Clinical measurements and metric calculations (3D-VA, perceptual score module, and direct preference) were conducted to compare the visual performance of the on-eye MCLsselected by both methods when differences existed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SimVis Gekko selected the same combination of MCLs as the fitting guides in 59 % of the cases. In 28 %, SimVis Gekko chose the alternative step with differences greater than 0.05 in 3D-VA. In these latter cases, the 3D-VAsobtained with the on-eye MCLs indicated that SimVis Gekko selections were better in 62 % of cases, equal in 14 %, and worse in 24 %. The perceptual score module showed that SimVis Gekko selections were better in 62 % of cases, equal in 9 %, and worse in 29 %. The direct preference indicated that SimVis Gekko selections were better in 61 % of cases. Clinical measurements revealed that MCLsselected by SimVis Gekko had better Near Activity Visual Questionnaire scoresthan the fitting guide selection acrossall manufacturers (p = 0.02), indicating greater comfort and independence for near activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SimVis Gekko can effectively replicate fitting guide steps and, in combinationwith the3D-VA metric, has the potential to become a tool that helps practitioners enhance MCL wearer satisfaction. This approach could improve the adoption and visual performance of MCLs among the presbyopic population,streamlining the fitting process.</p>","PeriodicalId":49087,"journal":{"name":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","volume":" ","pages":"102468"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving multifocal contact lens fitting by replicating their fitting guides using the SimVis Gekko visual simulator.\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Esteban-Ibañez, Ainhoa Molina-Martín, Elena Martínez-Plaza, Carlos Dorronsoro, Enrique Gambra, David P Piñero\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clae.2025.102468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of implementing fitting guides for multifocal contact lenses (MCLs) using the SimVis Gekko visual simulator and, through a preliminary assessment with a novel metric (3D-VA, which integrates visual acuity at multiple distances and patient visual needs), determine whether this combined approach can optimise initial MCL selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty presbyopic subjects participated in this study using two methods to select on-eye MCLs from 4 manufacturers: (1) using the first step of the fitting guide, according to the patient's addition need, to provide the MCLs recommended by the manufacturer and, (2) using SimVis Gekko simulations to obtain MCLs providing better 3D-VA, between the first and the first-alternative step of the fitting guides. Clinical measurements and metric calculations (3D-VA, perceptual score module, and direct preference) were conducted to compare the visual performance of the on-eye MCLsselected by both methods when differences existed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SimVis Gekko selected the same combination of MCLs as the fitting guides in 59 % of the cases. In 28 %, SimVis Gekko chose the alternative step with differences greater than 0.05 in 3D-VA. In these latter cases, the 3D-VAsobtained with the on-eye MCLs indicated that SimVis Gekko selections were better in 62 % of cases, equal in 14 %, and worse in 24 %. The perceptual score module showed that SimVis Gekko selections were better in 62 % of cases, equal in 9 %, and worse in 29 %. The direct preference indicated that SimVis Gekko selections were better in 61 % of cases. Clinical measurements revealed that MCLsselected by SimVis Gekko had better Near Activity Visual Questionnaire scoresthan the fitting guide selection acrossall manufacturers (p = 0.02), indicating greater comfort and independence for near activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SimVis Gekko can effectively replicate fitting guide steps and, in combinationwith the3D-VA metric, has the potential to become a tool that helps practitioners enhance MCL wearer satisfaction. This approach could improve the adoption and visual performance of MCLs among the presbyopic population,streamlining the fitting process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2025.102468\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2025.102468","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估使用SimVis Gekko视觉模拟器实施多焦点隐形眼镜(MCL)配戴指南的可行性,并通过一种新的度量(3D-VA,它集成了多距离的视力和患者的视觉需求)进行初步评估,确定这种组合方法是否可以优化初始MCL选择。方法:20名老视眼受试者采用两种方法从4家厂家选择眼上mcl:(1)采用第一步配镜,根据患者的附加需要,提供厂家推荐的mcl;(2)采用SimVis Gekko模拟,在第一步配镜和第一步可选配镜之间,获得提供更好3D-VA的mcl。通过临床测量和度量计算(3D-VA、感知评分模块和直接偏好)来比较两种方法选择的对眼mcl在存在差异时的视觉表现。结果:SimVis Gekko在59%的病例中选择了相同的mcl组合作为拟合指南。28%的SimVis Gekko选择了3D-VA的替代步骤,差异大于0.05。在后一种情况下,用眼上mcl获得的3d -血管显示,62%的病例SimVis Gekko选择更好,14%相同,24%更差。知觉评分模块显示,62%的情况下SimVis Gekko选择更好,9%的情况下相同,29%的情况下更差。直接偏好表明SimVis Gekko选择在61%的情况下更好。临床测量显示,SimVis Gekko选择的mcl在近距离活动视觉问卷评分上优于小制造商选择的拟合指南(p = 0.02),表明近距离活动更舒适和独立。结论:SimVis Gekko可以有效地复制试装指导步骤,并且与3d - va度量相结合,有可能成为帮助从业者提高MCL佩戴者满意度的工具。这种方法可以提高mcl在老视眼人群中的采用率和视觉表现,简化拟合过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving multifocal contact lens fitting by replicating their fitting guides using the SimVis Gekko visual simulator.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of implementing fitting guides for multifocal contact lenses (MCLs) using the SimVis Gekko visual simulator and, through a preliminary assessment with a novel metric (3D-VA, which integrates visual acuity at multiple distances and patient visual needs), determine whether this combined approach can optimise initial MCL selection.

Methods: Twenty presbyopic subjects participated in this study using two methods to select on-eye MCLs from 4 manufacturers: (1) using the first step of the fitting guide, according to the patient's addition need, to provide the MCLs recommended by the manufacturer and, (2) using SimVis Gekko simulations to obtain MCLs providing better 3D-VA, between the first and the first-alternative step of the fitting guides. Clinical measurements and metric calculations (3D-VA, perceptual score module, and direct preference) were conducted to compare the visual performance of the on-eye MCLsselected by both methods when differences existed.

Results: SimVis Gekko selected the same combination of MCLs as the fitting guides in 59 % of the cases. In 28 %, SimVis Gekko chose the alternative step with differences greater than 0.05 in 3D-VA. In these latter cases, the 3D-VAsobtained with the on-eye MCLs indicated that SimVis Gekko selections were better in 62 % of cases, equal in 14 %, and worse in 24 %. The perceptual score module showed that SimVis Gekko selections were better in 62 % of cases, equal in 9 %, and worse in 29 %. The direct preference indicated that SimVis Gekko selections were better in 61 % of cases. Clinical measurements revealed that MCLsselected by SimVis Gekko had better Near Activity Visual Questionnaire scoresthan the fitting guide selection acrossall manufacturers (p = 0.02), indicating greater comfort and independence for near activities.

Conclusions: SimVis Gekko can effectively replicate fitting guide steps and, in combinationwith the3D-VA metric, has the potential to become a tool that helps practitioners enhance MCL wearer satisfaction. This approach could improve the adoption and visual performance of MCLs among the presbyopic population,streamlining the fitting process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
198
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Contact Lens & Anterior Eye is a research-based journal covering all aspects of contact lens theory and practice, including original articles on invention and innovations, as well as the regular features of: Case Reports; Literary Reviews; Editorials; Instrumentation and Techniques and Dates of Professional Meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信