Mieke C W Eeckhaut, Michael S Rendall, Heide M Jackson
{"title":"渴望绝育逆转在特拉华州,美国:LARC使用的角色,个人堕胎的可接受性,和经济劣势。","authors":"Mieke C W Eeckhaut, Michael S Rendall, Heide M Jackson","doi":"10.1111/psrh.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the pathways that may elevate risks of desire for sterilization reversal, specifically through nonuse of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), viewing abortion as unacceptable for oneself, and being economically disadvantaged.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used chi-squared tests and binary logistic models to analyze data on 3422 women, including 299 sterilized women, from a population-representative sample of Delaware women aged 18-44 in 2021. We estimated models for female sterilization use and for desire for sterilization reversal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among sterilized Delaware women aged 18-44, 28% report desiring sterilization reversal. In multivariate models, those who had never used LARC were more likely to have been sterilized (OR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.09-2.40), although not more likely to desire sterilization reversal if sterilized. Women who viewed abortion as unacceptable for themselves were not more likely to be sterilized, but they were more likely to desire sterilization reversal if sterilized (OR = 2.42; 95% CI = 1.09-5.36). Economically disadvantaged women were both more likely to be sterilized (OR = 7.56; 95% CI = 4.51-12.68) and more likely, if sterilized, to desire sterilization reversal (OR = 3.88; 95% CI = 1.18-12.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We find varied pathways linking a woman's nonuse of LARC, her personal nonacceptability of abortion, and her economic disadvantage to increased risk of desiring sterilization reversal. Economic disadvantage is easily the greatest risk factor. We interpret these findings through a conceptual framework of constrained choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47632,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"162-174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Desire for Sterilization Reversal in Delaware, US: The Roles of LARC Use, Personal Abortion Acceptability, and Economic Disadvantage.\",\"authors\":\"Mieke C W Eeckhaut, Michael S Rendall, Heide M Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psrh.70014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the pathways that may elevate risks of desire for sterilization reversal, specifically through nonuse of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), viewing abortion as unacceptable for oneself, and being economically disadvantaged.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used chi-squared tests and binary logistic models to analyze data on 3422 women, including 299 sterilized women, from a population-representative sample of Delaware women aged 18-44 in 2021. We estimated models for female sterilization use and for desire for sterilization reversal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among sterilized Delaware women aged 18-44, 28% report desiring sterilization reversal. In multivariate models, those who had never used LARC were more likely to have been sterilized (OR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.09-2.40), although not more likely to desire sterilization reversal if sterilized. Women who viewed abortion as unacceptable for themselves were not more likely to be sterilized, but they were more likely to desire sterilization reversal if sterilized (OR = 2.42; 95% CI = 1.09-5.36). Economically disadvantaged women were both more likely to be sterilized (OR = 7.56; 95% CI = 4.51-12.68) and more likely, if sterilized, to desire sterilization reversal (OR = 3.88; 95% CI = 1.18-12.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We find varied pathways linking a woman's nonuse of LARC, her personal nonacceptability of abortion, and her economic disadvantage to increased risk of desiring sterilization reversal. Economic disadvantage is easily the greatest risk factor. We interpret these findings through a conceptual framework of constrained choice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"162-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psrh.70014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psrh.70014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨可能增加绝育逆转愿望风险的途径,特别是不使用长效可逆避孕(LARC),认为堕胎对自己来说是不可接受的,以及经济上处于不利地位。方法:我们采用卡方检验和二元logistic模型对3422名女性的数据进行分析,其中包括299名绝育女性,来自2021年特拉华州18-44岁的人口代表性样本。我们估计了女性绝育使用和绝育逆转愿望的模型。结果:在18-44岁的特拉华州绝育妇女中,28%的人报告希望逆转绝育。在多变量模型中,那些从未使用LARC的人更有可能被绝育(OR = 1.62;95% CI = 1.09-2.40),尽管灭菌后不希望逆转灭菌。认为堕胎对自己来说是不可接受的妇女不太可能进行绝育,但如果进行了绝育,她们更有可能希望逆转绝育(OR = 2.42;95% ci = 1.09-5.36)。经济条件较差的妇女更容易绝育(OR = 7.56;95% CI = 4.51-12.68),如果进行了灭菌,更有可能希望逆转灭菌(OR = 3.88;95% ci = 1.18-12.74)。结论:我们发现不同的途径将妇女不使用LARC,她个人对堕胎的不可接受性,以及她的经济劣势与希望逆转绝育的风险增加联系起来。经济劣势很容易成为最大的风险因素。我们通过约束选择的概念框架来解释这些发现。
Desire for Sterilization Reversal in Delaware, US: The Roles of LARC Use, Personal Abortion Acceptability, and Economic Disadvantage.
Objective: To investigate the pathways that may elevate risks of desire for sterilization reversal, specifically through nonuse of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), viewing abortion as unacceptable for oneself, and being economically disadvantaged.
Methods: We used chi-squared tests and binary logistic models to analyze data on 3422 women, including 299 sterilized women, from a population-representative sample of Delaware women aged 18-44 in 2021. We estimated models for female sterilization use and for desire for sterilization reversal.
Results: Among sterilized Delaware women aged 18-44, 28% report desiring sterilization reversal. In multivariate models, those who had never used LARC were more likely to have been sterilized (OR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.09-2.40), although not more likely to desire sterilization reversal if sterilized. Women who viewed abortion as unacceptable for themselves were not more likely to be sterilized, but they were more likely to desire sterilization reversal if sterilized (OR = 2.42; 95% CI = 1.09-5.36). Economically disadvantaged women were both more likely to be sterilized (OR = 7.56; 95% CI = 4.51-12.68) and more likely, if sterilized, to desire sterilization reversal (OR = 3.88; 95% CI = 1.18-12.74).
Conclusion: We find varied pathways linking a woman's nonuse of LARC, her personal nonacceptability of abortion, and her economic disadvantage to increased risk of desiring sterilization reversal. Economic disadvantage is easily the greatest risk factor. We interpret these findings through a conceptual framework of constrained choice.
期刊介绍:
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health provides the latest peer-reviewed, policy-relevant research and analysis on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and other developed countries. For more than four decades, Perspectives has offered unique insights into how reproductive health issues relate to one another; how they are affected by policies and programs; and their implications for individuals and societies. Published four times a year, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health includes original research, special reports and commentaries on the latest developments in the field of sexual and reproductive health, as well as staff-written summaries of recent findings in the field.