椅子冻结,一个基本的姿势在打破,施加超过1.5倍的接触压力集中在手掌桡侧与倒立相比。

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Takashi Tsuda, Hiroshi Kiyomatsu, Tomofumi Kinoshita, Masaki Takao
{"title":"椅子冻结,一个基本的姿势在打破,施加超过1.5倍的接触压力集中在手掌桡侧与倒立相比。","authors":"Takashi Tsuda, Hiroshi Kiyomatsu, Tomofumi Kinoshita, Masaki Takao","doi":"10.1177/1089313X251347442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Excessive contact forces on the hands during breaking can potentially cause a high injury incidence. Chair freeze is a basic posture unique to breaking; however, its effect on the hands remains unclear. Clarifying dancer-specific factors is essential for preventing trauma and overuse injuries. This study aimed to investigate the contact load and pressure on the hands during chair freeze and their determinants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>15 professional breakers were recruited. The peak landed load per bodyweight and contact pressure were measured using thin-film pressure sensors in the chair freeze and handstand postures. The location of the highest pressure was also assessed. The following possible factors of load and pressure were assessed: age, height, weight, body mass index, hand axis, practice duration, and grip strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Load per bodyweight and pressure were significantly higher in the chair freeze than in the handstand (0.69 bodyweight vs 0.47 bodyweight and 247.1 kPa vs 155.8 kPa; <i>P</i> < .0001 and <i>P</i> < .0001, respectively). In 14 of 15 dancers (93.3%), the highest pressure was concentrated on the radial side of the palm during chair freeze. Body height and weight were significantly correlated with load per bodyweight and pressure in chair freeze (ρ = 0.55, 0.57, 0.54, and 0.59; <i>P</i> = .036, .028, .038, and .020, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Load per bodyweight and pressure on the landed hand was 1.5- to 1.6-fold higher during the chair freeze than during the handstand, concentrating on the radial side of the palm. Dancers' body size was associated with the contact force on the hand in the chair freeze.</p>","PeriodicalId":46421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","volume":" ","pages":"1089313X251347442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chair Freeze, a Basic Posture in Breaking, Exerts Over 1.5 Times the Contact Pressure Concentrating on the Radial Half of the Palm Compared to Handstand.\",\"authors\":\"Takashi Tsuda, Hiroshi Kiyomatsu, Tomofumi Kinoshita, Masaki Takao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1089313X251347442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Excessive contact forces on the hands during breaking can potentially cause a high injury incidence. Chair freeze is a basic posture unique to breaking; however, its effect on the hands remains unclear. Clarifying dancer-specific factors is essential for preventing trauma and overuse injuries. This study aimed to investigate the contact load and pressure on the hands during chair freeze and their determinants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>15 professional breakers were recruited. The peak landed load per bodyweight and contact pressure were measured using thin-film pressure sensors in the chair freeze and handstand postures. The location of the highest pressure was also assessed. The following possible factors of load and pressure were assessed: age, height, weight, body mass index, hand axis, practice duration, and grip strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Load per bodyweight and pressure were significantly higher in the chair freeze than in the handstand (0.69 bodyweight vs 0.47 bodyweight and 247.1 kPa vs 155.8 kPa; <i>P</i> < .0001 and <i>P</i> < .0001, respectively). In 14 of 15 dancers (93.3%), the highest pressure was concentrated on the radial side of the palm during chair freeze. Body height and weight were significantly correlated with load per bodyweight and pressure in chair freeze (ρ = 0.55, 0.57, 0.54, and 0.59; <i>P</i> = .036, .028, .038, and .020, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Load per bodyweight and pressure on the landed hand was 1.5- to 1.6-fold higher during the chair freeze than during the handstand, concentrating on the radial side of the palm. Dancers' body size was associated with the contact force on the hand in the chair freeze.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1089313X251347442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X251347442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X251347442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在断裂过程中,手的接触力过大可能会导致高伤害发生率。椅子冻结是一个基本的姿势独特的打破;然而,它对手部的影响尚不清楚。明确舞者的特定因素对于防止创伤和过度使用损伤至关重要。本研究旨在探讨接触负荷和压力的手在椅子冻结和他们的决定因素。方法:招募15名专业打破者。使用薄膜压力传感器测量了在椅子冻结和倒立姿势下的每个体重的峰值着陆负荷和接触压力。还评估了最高压力的位置。评估以下可能的负荷和压力因素:年龄、身高、体重、身体质量指数、手轴、练习时间和握力。结果:椅子冻结组的每体重负荷和压力显著高于倒立组(0.69体重vs 0.47体重,247.1 kPa vs 155.8 kPa;p p p =。分别为0.036、0.028、0.038和0.020)。结论:在椅子冻结期间,每体重的负荷和落在手上的压力比倒立时高1.5- 1.6倍,集中在手掌的桡侧。舞者的体型与他们在椅子上受到的接触力有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chair Freeze, a Basic Posture in Breaking, Exerts Over 1.5 Times the Contact Pressure Concentrating on the Radial Half of the Palm Compared to Handstand.

Introduction: Excessive contact forces on the hands during breaking can potentially cause a high injury incidence. Chair freeze is a basic posture unique to breaking; however, its effect on the hands remains unclear. Clarifying dancer-specific factors is essential for preventing trauma and overuse injuries. This study aimed to investigate the contact load and pressure on the hands during chair freeze and their determinants.

Methods: 15 professional breakers were recruited. The peak landed load per bodyweight and contact pressure were measured using thin-film pressure sensors in the chair freeze and handstand postures. The location of the highest pressure was also assessed. The following possible factors of load and pressure were assessed: age, height, weight, body mass index, hand axis, practice duration, and grip strength.

Results: Load per bodyweight and pressure were significantly higher in the chair freeze than in the handstand (0.69 bodyweight vs 0.47 bodyweight and 247.1 kPa vs 155.8 kPa; P < .0001 and P < .0001, respectively). In 14 of 15 dancers (93.3%), the highest pressure was concentrated on the radial side of the palm during chair freeze. Body height and weight were significantly correlated with load per bodyweight and pressure in chair freeze (ρ = 0.55, 0.57, 0.54, and 0.59; P = .036, .028, .038, and .020, respectively).

Conclusion: Load per bodyweight and pressure on the landed hand was 1.5- to 1.6-fold higher during the chair freeze than during the handstand, concentrating on the radial side of the palm. Dancers' body size was associated with the contact force on the hand in the chair freeze.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信