自发性门系统分流对肝硬化肝性脑病患者临床预后的影响。

Q3 Medicine
Q Ke, T Lin, X J Lei, X T Weng, J He, X H Huang, L Li, W H Guo
{"title":"自发性门系统分流对肝硬化肝性脑病患者临床预后的影响。","authors":"Q Ke, T Lin, X J Lei, X T Weng, J He, X H Huang, L Li, W H Guo","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20240917-00495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the incidence, clinical characteristics, and impact of spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) in patients with liver cirrhosis combined with hepatic encephalopathy (HE). <b>Methods:</b> The basic clinical and follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed for patients diagnosed with cirrhosis combined with HE at Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University from January 2017 to December 2022. The patients were divided into large and small SPSS groups and a control group based on the results of abdominal enhanced CT or MRI.The clinical characteristics and outcome differences were compared among the three groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare HE-free survival time and overall survival time among the three groups. The log-rank test was used to compare the differences between groups. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the relevant risk factors affecting HE-free survival time and overall survival time. <b>Results:</b> A total of 223 cases with liver cirrhosis combined with HE were enrolled, including 150 in the SPSS and 73 in the control groups. The incidence rate of SPSS was 67.3% (150/223). The group was divided into small SPSS (79/150, 52.7%) and large SPSS group (71/150, 47.3%) according to the cross-sectional area of the diversion channel. The HE-free survival was shorter in the small and large SPSS groups compared with the control group (35.5 months in the small SPSS group and 21.3 months in the large SPSS group; <i>P</i><0.001). The HE-free survival time was shorter in the large SPSS than with small SPSS group (<i>P</i>=0.003). The overall survival time in the small SPSS group and the large SPSS group was shorter compared with the control group (small SPSS group: 39.4 months, large SPSS group: 52.9 months; <i>P</i><0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival time between the small SPSS and large SPSS groups (<i>P</i>=0.700). Cox regression analysis showed that SPSS was an independent risk factor affecting patients' HE-free survival time and overall survival time (<i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> SPSS is more common in patients with liver cirrhosis combined with HE. Patients who combined with SPSS showed significant reductions in both HE-free survival time and overall survival time, especially evident in those with combined large SPSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":24006,"journal":{"name":"中华肝脏病杂志","volume":"33 5","pages":"440-447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The impact of spontaneous portosystemic shunt on clinical outcomes in patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy].\",\"authors\":\"Q Ke, T Lin, X J Lei, X T Weng, J He, X H Huang, L Li, W H Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20240917-00495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the incidence, clinical characteristics, and impact of spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) in patients with liver cirrhosis combined with hepatic encephalopathy (HE). <b>Methods:</b> The basic clinical and follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed for patients diagnosed with cirrhosis combined with HE at Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University from January 2017 to December 2022. The patients were divided into large and small SPSS groups and a control group based on the results of abdominal enhanced CT or MRI.The clinical characteristics and outcome differences were compared among the three groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare HE-free survival time and overall survival time among the three groups. The log-rank test was used to compare the differences between groups. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the relevant risk factors affecting HE-free survival time and overall survival time. <b>Results:</b> A total of 223 cases with liver cirrhosis combined with HE were enrolled, including 150 in the SPSS and 73 in the control groups. The incidence rate of SPSS was 67.3% (150/223). The group was divided into small SPSS (79/150, 52.7%) and large SPSS group (71/150, 47.3%) according to the cross-sectional area of the diversion channel. The HE-free survival was shorter in the small and large SPSS groups compared with the control group (35.5 months in the small SPSS group and 21.3 months in the large SPSS group; <i>P</i><0.001). The HE-free survival time was shorter in the large SPSS than with small SPSS group (<i>P</i>=0.003). The overall survival time in the small SPSS group and the large SPSS group was shorter compared with the control group (small SPSS group: 39.4 months, large SPSS group: 52.9 months; <i>P</i><0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival time between the small SPSS and large SPSS groups (<i>P</i>=0.700). Cox regression analysis showed that SPSS was an independent risk factor affecting patients' HE-free survival time and overall survival time (<i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> SPSS is more common in patients with liver cirrhosis combined with HE. Patients who combined with SPSS showed significant reductions in both HE-free survival time and overall survival time, especially evident in those with combined large SPSS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华肝脏病杂志\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"440-447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华肝脏病杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20240917-00495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肝脏病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20240917-00495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨肝硬化合并肝性脑病(HE)患者自发性门系统分流(SPSS)的发生率、临床特点及影响。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2022年12月福建医科大学孟潮肝胆医院诊断为肝硬化合并HE患者的基本临床及随访资料。根据腹部增强CT或MRI结果将患者分为大、小SPSS组和对照组。比较三组患者的临床特点及预后差异。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线比较三组患者无he生存时间和总生存时间。采用log-rank检验比较组间差异。采用Cox回归分析确定影响无he生存时间和总生存时间的相关危险因素。结果:共纳入223例肝硬化合并HE患者,其中SPSS组150例,对照组73例。SPSS的发病率为67.3%(150/223)。按导流通道截面积分为小SPSS组(79/150,52.7%)和大SPSS组(71/150,47.3%)。小、大SPSS组患者无he生存期较对照组短(小SPSS组35.5个月,大SPSS组21.3个月;页= 0.003)。与对照组相比,小SPSS组和大SPSS组的总生存时间均较短(小SPSS组:39.4个月,大SPSS组:52.9个月;页= 0.700)。Cox回归分析显示,SPSS是影响患者无HE生存时间和总生存时间的独立危险因素(p)。结论:SPSS在肝硬化合并HE患者中更为常见。合并SPSS的患者在无he生存时间和总生存时间上均有显著降低,尤其是合并大SPSS的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The impact of spontaneous portosystemic shunt on clinical outcomes in patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy].

Objective: To investigate the incidence, clinical characteristics, and impact of spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) in patients with liver cirrhosis combined with hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Methods: The basic clinical and follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed for patients diagnosed with cirrhosis combined with HE at Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University from January 2017 to December 2022. The patients were divided into large and small SPSS groups and a control group based on the results of abdominal enhanced CT or MRI.The clinical characteristics and outcome differences were compared among the three groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare HE-free survival time and overall survival time among the three groups. The log-rank test was used to compare the differences between groups. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the relevant risk factors affecting HE-free survival time and overall survival time. Results: A total of 223 cases with liver cirrhosis combined with HE were enrolled, including 150 in the SPSS and 73 in the control groups. The incidence rate of SPSS was 67.3% (150/223). The group was divided into small SPSS (79/150, 52.7%) and large SPSS group (71/150, 47.3%) according to the cross-sectional area of the diversion channel. The HE-free survival was shorter in the small and large SPSS groups compared with the control group (35.5 months in the small SPSS group and 21.3 months in the large SPSS group; P<0.001). The HE-free survival time was shorter in the large SPSS than with small SPSS group (P=0.003). The overall survival time in the small SPSS group and the large SPSS group was shorter compared with the control group (small SPSS group: 39.4 months, large SPSS group: 52.9 months; P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival time between the small SPSS and large SPSS groups (P=0.700). Cox regression analysis showed that SPSS was an independent risk factor affecting patients' HE-free survival time and overall survival time (P<0.05). Conclusion: SPSS is more common in patients with liver cirrhosis combined with HE. Patients who combined with SPSS showed significant reductions in both HE-free survival time and overall survival time, especially evident in those with combined large SPSS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华肝脏病杂志
中华肝脏病杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7574
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信