{"title":"空肠端到端吻合术后空肠横断角的离体比较及对管腔直径的影响。","authors":"Christopher M Baldwin, Alexandra Gillen","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate three different jejunal transection angles for end-to-end jejunojejunostomies, comparing construction time, lumen size, and suture number.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Ex vivo cadaver study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>Eight euthanized horses each had three mid-jejunal specimens harvested.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Jejunal segments were assigned to one of three groups (A30, A45, and A60) and transected at 30, 45, or 60°, respectively. Following transection, a standardized handsewn single-layer interrupted modified Lembert anastomosis was performed, and construction time and number of sutures placed were recorded. Anastomotic index (AI) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Transected jejunal lengths increased as the transection angle decreased (p < .001). Anastomoses construction time was not different between groups (p = .301). The number of sutures required to complete the anastomosis was higher (p = .026) for A30 compared to A60 but was not different between A60 and A45 or A45 and A30 (p > .333). Mean AI were 93.37, 114.29, and 135.07 for groups A60, A45, and A30 and the AI increased as the transection angle decreased (p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 60° transection angle reduced lumen size at the anastomosis but a 45 and 30° transection angle resulted in an increased lumen size at the anastomosis. The 45° angle did not increase the number of sutures required. The 30° angle significantly increased the number of sutures required.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>A 45° angle of transection does not result in increased surgical time or number of sutures placed. Further investigation is required to determine the ideal angle of transection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An ex vivo comparison of jejunal transection angles and the effect on lumen diameter following end-to-end jejunojejunal anastomoses.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher M Baldwin, Alexandra Gillen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vsu.14294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate three different jejunal transection angles for end-to-end jejunojejunostomies, comparing construction time, lumen size, and suture number.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Ex vivo cadaver study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>Eight euthanized horses each had three mid-jejunal specimens harvested.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Jejunal segments were assigned to one of three groups (A30, A45, and A60) and transected at 30, 45, or 60°, respectively. Following transection, a standardized handsewn single-layer interrupted modified Lembert anastomosis was performed, and construction time and number of sutures placed were recorded. Anastomotic index (AI) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Transected jejunal lengths increased as the transection angle decreased (p < .001). Anastomoses construction time was not different between groups (p = .301). The number of sutures required to complete the anastomosis was higher (p = .026) for A30 compared to A60 but was not different between A60 and A45 or A45 and A30 (p > .333). Mean AI were 93.37, 114.29, and 135.07 for groups A60, A45, and A30 and the AI increased as the transection angle decreased (p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 60° transection angle reduced lumen size at the anastomosis but a 45 and 30° transection angle resulted in an increased lumen size at the anastomosis. The 45° angle did not increase the number of sutures required. The 30° angle significantly increased the number of sutures required.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>A 45° angle of transection does not result in increased surgical time or number of sutures placed. Further investigation is required to determine the ideal angle of transection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14294\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14294","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
An ex vivo comparison of jejunal transection angles and the effect on lumen diameter following end-to-end jejunojejunal anastomoses.
Objective: To evaluate three different jejunal transection angles for end-to-end jejunojejunostomies, comparing construction time, lumen size, and suture number.
Study design: Ex vivo cadaver study.
Sample population: Eight euthanized horses each had three mid-jejunal specimens harvested.
Methods: Jejunal segments were assigned to one of three groups (A30, A45, and A60) and transected at 30, 45, or 60°, respectively. Following transection, a standardized handsewn single-layer interrupted modified Lembert anastomosis was performed, and construction time and number of sutures placed were recorded. Anastomotic index (AI) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.
Results: Transected jejunal lengths increased as the transection angle decreased (p < .001). Anastomoses construction time was not different between groups (p = .301). The number of sutures required to complete the anastomosis was higher (p = .026) for A30 compared to A60 but was not different between A60 and A45 or A45 and A30 (p > .333). Mean AI were 93.37, 114.29, and 135.07 for groups A60, A45, and A30 and the AI increased as the transection angle decreased (p < .001).
Conclusion: A 60° transection angle reduced lumen size at the anastomosis but a 45 and 30° transection angle resulted in an increased lumen size at the anastomosis. The 45° angle did not increase the number of sutures required. The 30° angle significantly increased the number of sutures required.
Clinical significance: A 45° angle of transection does not result in increased surgical time or number of sutures placed. Further investigation is required to determine the ideal angle of transection.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations.
It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.