Charles Piercy, John Adam, James N Harrison, Christian Heiss, Paola Campagnolo, Ben Creagh-Brown
{"title":"血管内内皮细胞活检-系统回顾。","authors":"Charles Piercy, John Adam, James N Harrison, Christian Heiss, Paola Campagnolo, Ben Creagh-Brown","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Endovascular endothelial cell biopsy (ECBx) allows direct sampling of endothelial cells (ECs) and subsequent assessment of EC function in patients. Our systematic review aims to summarise the current literature describing protocols to obtain and analyse EC and obtain pooled estimates of success rate and EC numbers obtained with different techniques in different populations. <i>Materials and methods:</i> Studies were identified on Medline using the terms 'endothelial cell' AND 'biopsy' AND 'humans'. All primary research involving EC biopsy was included, while animal studies or non-primary research studies were excluded from the review. The data was integrated into a narrative review and the study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022278551). <i>Results:</i> Of all journal articles identified (n=784), 51 articles were included in this review. Most studies (n=46) used a J wire for EC sampling from blood vessels in the arm (superficial arm veins [n=30], brachial artery [n=3], radial artery [n=4]). The pooled success rate was 91±15%. The average yield was 1,058±893 cells per biopsy, with variability depending on procedural factors such as wire placement, depth and technique. No significant complications were reported. Several analytical techniques were used to evaluate the isolated ECs with the most common technique being immunofluorescence (n=36). Risk of bias assessment and statistical analysis not performed due to heterogeneity of data and variability in reporting. <i>Conclusions:</i> Endothelial cells can be obtained with a variety of techniques with a high success rate and minimal complications. This review highlights novel research opportunities provided by ECBx.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"305-313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular endothelial cell biopsy - a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Charles Piercy, John Adam, James N Harrison, Christian Heiss, Paola Campagnolo, Ben Creagh-Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/0301-1526/a001207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Endovascular endothelial cell biopsy (ECBx) allows direct sampling of endothelial cells (ECs) and subsequent assessment of EC function in patients. Our systematic review aims to summarise the current literature describing protocols to obtain and analyse EC and obtain pooled estimates of success rate and EC numbers obtained with different techniques in different populations. <i>Materials and methods:</i> Studies were identified on Medline using the terms 'endothelial cell' AND 'biopsy' AND 'humans'. All primary research involving EC biopsy was included, while animal studies or non-primary research studies were excluded from the review. The data was integrated into a narrative review and the study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022278551). <i>Results:</i> Of all journal articles identified (n=784), 51 articles were included in this review. Most studies (n=46) used a J wire for EC sampling from blood vessels in the arm (superficial arm veins [n=30], brachial artery [n=3], radial artery [n=4]). The pooled success rate was 91±15%. The average yield was 1,058±893 cells per biopsy, with variability depending on procedural factors such as wire placement, depth and technique. No significant complications were reported. Several analytical techniques were used to evaluate the isolated ECs with the most common technique being immunofluorescence (n=36). Risk of bias assessment and statistical analysis not performed due to heterogeneity of data and variability in reporting. <i>Conclusions:</i> Endothelial cells can be obtained with a variety of techniques with a high success rate and minimal complications. This review highlights novel research opportunities provided by ECBx.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"305-313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001207\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Endovascular endothelial cell biopsy - a systematic review.
Background: Endovascular endothelial cell biopsy (ECBx) allows direct sampling of endothelial cells (ECs) and subsequent assessment of EC function in patients. Our systematic review aims to summarise the current literature describing protocols to obtain and analyse EC and obtain pooled estimates of success rate and EC numbers obtained with different techniques in different populations. Materials and methods: Studies were identified on Medline using the terms 'endothelial cell' AND 'biopsy' AND 'humans'. All primary research involving EC biopsy was included, while animal studies or non-primary research studies were excluded from the review. The data was integrated into a narrative review and the study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022278551). Results: Of all journal articles identified (n=784), 51 articles were included in this review. Most studies (n=46) used a J wire for EC sampling from blood vessels in the arm (superficial arm veins [n=30], brachial artery [n=3], radial artery [n=4]). The pooled success rate was 91±15%. The average yield was 1,058±893 cells per biopsy, with variability depending on procedural factors such as wire placement, depth and technique. No significant complications were reported. Several analytical techniques were used to evaluate the isolated ECs with the most common technique being immunofluorescence (n=36). Risk of bias assessment and statistical analysis not performed due to heterogeneity of data and variability in reporting. Conclusions: Endothelial cells can be obtained with a variety of techniques with a high success rate and minimal complications. This review highlights novel research opportunities provided by ECBx.
期刊介绍:
Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology.
The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation.
Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.