Mirabegron作为输尿管远端结石药物排出疗法的疗效:文献系统综述、meta分析和试验序贯分析。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY
Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2025-05-30 Epub Date: 2025-05-27 DOI:10.21037/tau-2025-112
Richard Dobrucki de Lima, Lucas Schenk de Almeida, Breno Cordeiro Porto, Nathalie Cordeiro Hobaica, Carlo Camargo Passerotti, Rodrigo A S Sardenberg, José Pinhata Otoch, José Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz
{"title":"Mirabegron作为输尿管远端结石药物排出疗法的疗效:文献系统综述、meta分析和试验序贯分析。","authors":"Richard Dobrucki de Lima, Lucas Schenk de Almeida, Breno Cordeiro Porto, Nathalie Cordeiro Hobaica, Carlo Camargo Passerotti, Rodrigo A S Sardenberg, José Pinhata Otoch, José Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz","doi":"10.21037/tau-2025-112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is recommended for distal ureteral stones measuring 5 to 10 mm. Mirabegron, a β3-adrenergic agonist, has been proposed as a potential agent to improve stone expulsion rate (SER) and stone expulsion time (SET). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of mirabegron compared to placebo for MET in distal ureteral stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until December 2023. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs including 419 patients were analyzed. No significant differences were observed between mirabegron and placebo for SER [risk ratio (RR): 1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-2.45, P=0.08, I<sup>2</sup>=53%], SET [mean difference (MD): -1.92, 95% CI: -5.38-1.54, P=0.28, I<sup>2</sup>=95%], or analgesic use (MD: -1.03, 95% CI: -2.16-0.09, P=0.07, I<sup>2</sup>=89%). Trial sequential analysis indicated that the current evidence remains insufficient to conclusively determine mirabegron's effect, though the accumulated data are approaching the futility boundary, suggesting that one additional RCT may be sufficient for a definitive conclusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mirabegron does not provide a significant benefit as a MET for distal ureteral stones measuring 5 to 10 mm. Further RCTs are necessary to establish its potential role in ureterolithiasis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"14 5","pages":"1253-1260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mirabegron efficacy as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review of the literature, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Dobrucki de Lima, Lucas Schenk de Almeida, Breno Cordeiro Porto, Nathalie Cordeiro Hobaica, Carlo Camargo Passerotti, Rodrigo A S Sardenberg, José Pinhata Otoch, José Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tau-2025-112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is recommended for distal ureteral stones measuring 5 to 10 mm. Mirabegron, a β3-adrenergic agonist, has been proposed as a potential agent to improve stone expulsion rate (SER) and stone expulsion time (SET). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of mirabegron compared to placebo for MET in distal ureteral stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until December 2023. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs including 419 patients were analyzed. No significant differences were observed between mirabegron and placebo for SER [risk ratio (RR): 1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-2.45, P=0.08, I<sup>2</sup>=53%], SET [mean difference (MD): -1.92, 95% CI: -5.38-1.54, P=0.28, I<sup>2</sup>=95%], or analgesic use (MD: -1.03, 95% CI: -2.16-0.09, P=0.07, I<sup>2</sup>=89%). Trial sequential analysis indicated that the current evidence remains insufficient to conclusively determine mirabegron's effect, though the accumulated data are approaching the futility boundary, suggesting that one additional RCT may be sufficient for a definitive conclusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mirabegron does not provide a significant benefit as a MET for distal ureteral stones measuring 5 to 10 mm. Further RCTs are necessary to establish its potential role in ureterolithiasis management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"14 5\",\"pages\":\"1253-1260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170219/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2025-112\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2025-112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于输尿管远端5 ~ 10mm结石,推荐采用药物排出疗法。Mirabegron是一种β3肾上腺素能激动剂,被认为是提高结石排出率(SER)和结石排出时间(SET)的潜在药物。本研究旨在评价mirabegron与安慰剂相比治疗输尿管远端结石的疗效。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials从成立到2023年12月的文献。本分析仅纳入随机对照试验(rct)。结果:共分析5项rct,共419例患者。mirabegron和安慰剂在SER[风险比(RR): 1.49, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.91-2.45, P=0.08, I2=53%]、SET[平均差异(MD): -1.92, 95% CI: -5.38-1.54, P=0.28, I2=95%]或镇痛使用(MD: -1.03, 95% CI: -2.16-0.09, P=0.07, I2=89%)方面均无显著差异。试验序列分析表明,尽管累积的数据接近无效边界,但目前的证据仍不足以最终确定mirabegron的效果,这表明一项额外的随机对照试验可能足以得出明确的结论。结论:Mirabegron作为输尿管远端5 - 10mm结石的MET治疗效果不显著。需要进一步的随机对照试验来确定其在输尿管结石治疗中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mirabegron efficacy as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review of the literature, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Mirabegron efficacy as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review of the literature, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Mirabegron efficacy as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review of the literature, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Mirabegron efficacy as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review of the literature, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Background: Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is recommended for distal ureteral stones measuring 5 to 10 mm. Mirabegron, a β3-adrenergic agonist, has been proposed as a potential agent to improve stone expulsion rate (SER) and stone expulsion time (SET). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of mirabegron compared to placebo for MET in distal ureteral stones.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until December 2023. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the analysis.

Results: Five RCTs including 419 patients were analyzed. No significant differences were observed between mirabegron and placebo for SER [risk ratio (RR): 1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-2.45, P=0.08, I2=53%], SET [mean difference (MD): -1.92, 95% CI: -5.38-1.54, P=0.28, I2=95%], or analgesic use (MD: -1.03, 95% CI: -2.16-0.09, P=0.07, I2=89%). Trial sequential analysis indicated that the current evidence remains insufficient to conclusively determine mirabegron's effect, though the accumulated data are approaching the futility boundary, suggesting that one additional RCT may be sufficient for a definitive conclusion.

Conclusions: Mirabegron does not provide a significant benefit as a MET for distal ureteral stones measuring 5 to 10 mm. Further RCTs are necessary to establish its potential role in ureterolithiasis management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信