Richard Dobrucki de Lima, Lucas Schenk de Almeida, Breno Cordeiro Porto, Nathalie Cordeiro Hobaica, Carlo Camargo Passerotti, Rodrigo A S Sardenberg, José Pinhata Otoch, José Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz
{"title":"Mirabegron作为输尿管远端结石药物排出疗法的疗效:文献系统综述、meta分析和试验序贯分析。","authors":"Richard Dobrucki de Lima, Lucas Schenk de Almeida, Breno Cordeiro Porto, Nathalie Cordeiro Hobaica, Carlo Camargo Passerotti, Rodrigo A S Sardenberg, José Pinhata Otoch, José Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz","doi":"10.21037/tau-2025-112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is recommended for distal ureteral stones measuring 5 to 10 mm. Mirabegron, a β3-adrenergic agonist, has been proposed as a potential agent to improve stone expulsion rate (SER) and stone expulsion time (SET). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of mirabegron compared to placebo for MET in distal ureteral stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until December 2023. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs including 419 patients were analyzed. No significant differences were observed between mirabegron and placebo for SER [risk ratio (RR): 1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-2.45, P=0.08, I<sup>2</sup>=53%], SET [mean difference (MD): -1.92, 95% CI: -5.38-1.54, P=0.28, I<sup>2</sup>=95%], or analgesic use (MD: -1.03, 95% CI: -2.16-0.09, P=0.07, I<sup>2</sup>=89%). Trial sequential analysis indicated that the current evidence remains insufficient to conclusively determine mirabegron's effect, though the accumulated data are approaching the futility boundary, suggesting that one additional RCT may be sufficient for a definitive conclusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mirabegron does not provide a significant benefit as a MET for distal ureteral stones measuring 5 to 10 mm. Further RCTs are necessary to establish its potential role in ureterolithiasis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"14 5","pages":"1253-1260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mirabegron efficacy as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review of the literature, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Dobrucki de Lima, Lucas Schenk de Almeida, Breno Cordeiro Porto, Nathalie Cordeiro Hobaica, Carlo Camargo Passerotti, Rodrigo A S Sardenberg, José Pinhata Otoch, José Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tau-2025-112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is recommended for distal ureteral stones measuring 5 to 10 mm. Mirabegron, a β3-adrenergic agonist, has been proposed as a potential agent to improve stone expulsion rate (SER) and stone expulsion time (SET). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of mirabegron compared to placebo for MET in distal ureteral stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until December 2023. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs including 419 patients were analyzed. No significant differences were observed between mirabegron and placebo for SER [risk ratio (RR): 1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-2.45, P=0.08, I<sup>2</sup>=53%], SET [mean difference (MD): -1.92, 95% CI: -5.38-1.54, P=0.28, I<sup>2</sup>=95%], or analgesic use (MD: -1.03, 95% CI: -2.16-0.09, P=0.07, I<sup>2</sup>=89%). Trial sequential analysis indicated that the current evidence remains insufficient to conclusively determine mirabegron's effect, though the accumulated data are approaching the futility boundary, suggesting that one additional RCT may be sufficient for a definitive conclusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mirabegron does not provide a significant benefit as a MET for distal ureteral stones measuring 5 to 10 mm. Further RCTs are necessary to establish its potential role in ureterolithiasis management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"14 5\",\"pages\":\"1253-1260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170219/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2025-112\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2025-112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mirabegron efficacy as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review of the literature, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
Background: Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is recommended for distal ureteral stones measuring 5 to 10 mm. Mirabegron, a β3-adrenergic agonist, has been proposed as a potential agent to improve stone expulsion rate (SER) and stone expulsion time (SET). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of mirabegron compared to placebo for MET in distal ureteral stones.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until December 2023. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the analysis.
Results: Five RCTs including 419 patients were analyzed. No significant differences were observed between mirabegron and placebo for SER [risk ratio (RR): 1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-2.45, P=0.08, I2=53%], SET [mean difference (MD): -1.92, 95% CI: -5.38-1.54, P=0.28, I2=95%], or analgesic use (MD: -1.03, 95% CI: -2.16-0.09, P=0.07, I2=89%). Trial sequential analysis indicated that the current evidence remains insufficient to conclusively determine mirabegron's effect, though the accumulated data are approaching the futility boundary, suggesting that one additional RCT may be sufficient for a definitive conclusion.
Conclusions: Mirabegron does not provide a significant benefit as a MET for distal ureteral stones measuring 5 to 10 mm. Further RCTs are necessary to establish its potential role in ureterolithiasis management.
期刊介绍:
ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.