Stephen Stopenski, Louis Perkins, Jarrett E Santorelli, Laura N Haines, Jeanne G Lee, Eli Strait, Todd W Costantini, Jay J Doucet, Allison E Berndtson
{"title":"无住房状态,而不是地区剥夺指数,是烧伤患者耐药感染的独立危险因素。","authors":"Stephen Stopenski, Louis Perkins, Jarrett E Santorelli, Laura N Haines, Jeanne G Lee, Eli Strait, Todd W Costantini, Jay J Doucet, Allison E Berndtson","doi":"10.1089/sur.2024.273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Patients with burn injuries are especially prone to infections; however, the influence of socioeconomic status on infection following burn injury remains poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the association between socioeconomic disadvantage and risk of infection among burn patients. We hypothesize that burn patients with more socioeconomic disadvantage have an increased risk of infections. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> The burn registry of an American Burn Association-verified burn center was queried for all admissions from 2015 to 2019. Patients admitted for <7 days or with a home address outside California were excluded. Collected data included demographics, burn characteristics, and culture results. Patient home addresses were geocoded, and correlated Area Deprivation Index (ADI) scores were classified into quintiles. Unhoused patients were classified as a separate category. Groups were then compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. The primary outcome was any infection. Resistant infections were analyzed as a secondary outcome. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 788 patients were included for analysis. The median ADI state decile was 6 (interquartile range = 5-8); 4.6% (n = 36) of patients were unhoused. 16.6% (n = 131) of patients had an infection during admission, whereas 6.3% (n = 50) had an infection with a resistant organism. Risk factors for having an infection included age (p < 0.001), percent total body surface area burned (p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (0.004). ADI quintile was not associated with infection. The unhoused state was an independent risk factor for resistant infection (odds ratio = 3.37, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-9.31, p = 0.027). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> ADI was not associated with an increased risk of infection, but unhoused patients are at increased risk of developing an infection with a resistant organism during admission for a burn injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":22109,"journal":{"name":"Surgical infections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Unhoused State, Not Area Deprivation Index, Is an Independent Risk Factor for Resistant Infections in Burn Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Stopenski, Louis Perkins, Jarrett E Santorelli, Laura N Haines, Jeanne G Lee, Eli Strait, Todd W Costantini, Jay J Doucet, Allison E Berndtson\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/sur.2024.273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Patients with burn injuries are especially prone to infections; however, the influence of socioeconomic status on infection following burn injury remains poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the association between socioeconomic disadvantage and risk of infection among burn patients. We hypothesize that burn patients with more socioeconomic disadvantage have an increased risk of infections. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> The burn registry of an American Burn Association-verified burn center was queried for all admissions from 2015 to 2019. Patients admitted for <7 days or with a home address outside California were excluded. Collected data included demographics, burn characteristics, and culture results. Patient home addresses were geocoded, and correlated Area Deprivation Index (ADI) scores were classified into quintiles. Unhoused patients were classified as a separate category. Groups were then compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. The primary outcome was any infection. Resistant infections were analyzed as a secondary outcome. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 788 patients were included for analysis. The median ADI state decile was 6 (interquartile range = 5-8); 4.6% (n = 36) of patients were unhoused. 16.6% (n = 131) of patients had an infection during admission, whereas 6.3% (n = 50) had an infection with a resistant organism. Risk factors for having an infection included age (p < 0.001), percent total body surface area burned (p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (0.004). ADI quintile was not associated with infection. The unhoused state was an independent risk factor for resistant infection (odds ratio = 3.37, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-9.31, p = 0.027). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> ADI was not associated with an increased risk of infection, but unhoused patients are at increased risk of developing an infection with a resistant organism during admission for a burn injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical infections\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.273\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Unhoused State, Not Area Deprivation Index, Is an Independent Risk Factor for Resistant Infections in Burn Patients.
Background: Patients with burn injuries are especially prone to infections; however, the influence of socioeconomic status on infection following burn injury remains poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the association between socioeconomic disadvantage and risk of infection among burn patients. We hypothesize that burn patients with more socioeconomic disadvantage have an increased risk of infections. Patients and Methods: The burn registry of an American Burn Association-verified burn center was queried for all admissions from 2015 to 2019. Patients admitted for <7 days or with a home address outside California were excluded. Collected data included demographics, burn characteristics, and culture results. Patient home addresses were geocoded, and correlated Area Deprivation Index (ADI) scores were classified into quintiles. Unhoused patients were classified as a separate category. Groups were then compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. The primary outcome was any infection. Resistant infections were analyzed as a secondary outcome. Results: Overall, 788 patients were included for analysis. The median ADI state decile was 6 (interquartile range = 5-8); 4.6% (n = 36) of patients were unhoused. 16.6% (n = 131) of patients had an infection during admission, whereas 6.3% (n = 50) had an infection with a resistant organism. Risk factors for having an infection included age (p < 0.001), percent total body surface area burned (p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (0.004). ADI quintile was not associated with infection. The unhoused state was an independent risk factor for resistant infection (odds ratio = 3.37, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-9.31, p = 0.027). Conclusions: ADI was not associated with an increased risk of infection, but unhoused patients are at increased risk of developing an infection with a resistant organism during admission for a burn injury.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Infections provides comprehensive and authoritative information on the biology, prevention, and management of post-operative infections. Original articles cover the latest advancements, new therapeutic management strategies, and translational research that is being applied to improve clinical outcomes and successfully treat post-operative infections.
Surgical Infections coverage includes:
-Peritonitis and intra-abdominal infections-
Surgical site infections-
Pneumonia and other nosocomial infections-
Cellular and humoral immunity-
Biology of the host response-
Organ dysfunction syndromes-
Antibiotic use-
Resistant and opportunistic pathogens-
Epidemiology and prevention-
The operating room environment-
Diagnostic studies