无住房状态,而不是地区剥夺指数,是烧伤患者耐药感染的独立危险因素。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Stephen Stopenski, Louis Perkins, Jarrett E Santorelli, Laura N Haines, Jeanne G Lee, Eli Strait, Todd W Costantini, Jay J Doucet, Allison E Berndtson
{"title":"无住房状态,而不是地区剥夺指数,是烧伤患者耐药感染的独立危险因素。","authors":"Stephen Stopenski, Louis Perkins, Jarrett E Santorelli, Laura N Haines, Jeanne G Lee, Eli Strait, Todd W Costantini, Jay J Doucet, Allison E Berndtson","doi":"10.1089/sur.2024.273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Patients with burn injuries are especially prone to infections; however, the influence of socioeconomic status on infection following burn injury remains poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the association between socioeconomic disadvantage and risk of infection among burn patients. We hypothesize that burn patients with more socioeconomic disadvantage have an increased risk of infections. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> The burn registry of an American Burn Association-verified burn center was queried for all admissions from 2015 to 2019. Patients admitted for <7 days or with a home address outside California were excluded. Collected data included demographics, burn characteristics, and culture results. Patient home addresses were geocoded, and correlated Area Deprivation Index (ADI) scores were classified into quintiles. Unhoused patients were classified as a separate category. Groups were then compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. The primary outcome was any infection. Resistant infections were analyzed as a secondary outcome. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 788 patients were included for analysis. The median ADI state decile was 6 (interquartile range = 5-8); 4.6% (n = 36) of patients were unhoused. 16.6% (n = 131) of patients had an infection during admission, whereas 6.3% (n = 50) had an infection with a resistant organism. Risk factors for having an infection included age (p < 0.001), percent total body surface area burned (p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (0.004). ADI quintile was not associated with infection. The unhoused state was an independent risk factor for resistant infection (odds ratio = 3.37, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-9.31, p = 0.027). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> ADI was not associated with an increased risk of infection, but unhoused patients are at increased risk of developing an infection with a resistant organism during admission for a burn injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":22109,"journal":{"name":"Surgical infections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Unhoused State, Not Area Deprivation Index, Is an Independent Risk Factor for Resistant Infections in Burn Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Stopenski, Louis Perkins, Jarrett E Santorelli, Laura N Haines, Jeanne G Lee, Eli Strait, Todd W Costantini, Jay J Doucet, Allison E Berndtson\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/sur.2024.273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Patients with burn injuries are especially prone to infections; however, the influence of socioeconomic status on infection following burn injury remains poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the association between socioeconomic disadvantage and risk of infection among burn patients. We hypothesize that burn patients with more socioeconomic disadvantage have an increased risk of infections. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> The burn registry of an American Burn Association-verified burn center was queried for all admissions from 2015 to 2019. Patients admitted for <7 days or with a home address outside California were excluded. Collected data included demographics, burn characteristics, and culture results. Patient home addresses were geocoded, and correlated Area Deprivation Index (ADI) scores were classified into quintiles. Unhoused patients were classified as a separate category. Groups were then compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. The primary outcome was any infection. Resistant infections were analyzed as a secondary outcome. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 788 patients were included for analysis. The median ADI state decile was 6 (interquartile range = 5-8); 4.6% (n = 36) of patients were unhoused. 16.6% (n = 131) of patients had an infection during admission, whereas 6.3% (n = 50) had an infection with a resistant organism. Risk factors for having an infection included age (p < 0.001), percent total body surface area burned (p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (0.004). ADI quintile was not associated with infection. The unhoused state was an independent risk factor for resistant infection (odds ratio = 3.37, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-9.31, p = 0.027). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> ADI was not associated with an increased risk of infection, but unhoused patients are at increased risk of developing an infection with a resistant organism during admission for a burn injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical infections\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.273\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:烧伤患者特别容易发生感染;然而,社会经济地位对烧伤后感染的影响仍然知之甚少。本研究旨在评估社会经济劣势与烧伤患者感染风险之间的关系。我们假设社会经济条件越差的烧伤患者感染的风险越高。患者和方法:查询2015年至2019年美国烧伤协会认证的烧伤中心的烧伤登记处的所有入院患者。入院患者的结果:总的来说,788例患者被纳入分析。ADI状态十分位数中位数为6(四分位数间距= 5-8);4.6% (n = 36)的患者没有住房。16.6% (n = 131)的患者在入院时发生感染,6.3% (n = 50)的患者发生耐药菌感染。发生感染的危险因素包括年龄(p < 0.001)、烧伤总面积百分比(p < 0.001)和糖尿病(0.004)。ADI五分位数与感染无关。未饲养状态是耐药感染的独立危险因素(优势比= 3.37,95%可信区间= 1.05 ~ 9.31,p = 0.027)。结论:ADI与感染风险增加无关,但未入住的患者在因烧伤入院期间发生耐药菌感染的风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Unhoused State, Not Area Deprivation Index, Is an Independent Risk Factor for Resistant Infections in Burn Patients.

Background: Patients with burn injuries are especially prone to infections; however, the influence of socioeconomic status on infection following burn injury remains poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the association between socioeconomic disadvantage and risk of infection among burn patients. We hypothesize that burn patients with more socioeconomic disadvantage have an increased risk of infections. Patients and Methods: The burn registry of an American Burn Association-verified burn center was queried for all admissions from 2015 to 2019. Patients admitted for <7 days or with a home address outside California were excluded. Collected data included demographics, burn characteristics, and culture results. Patient home addresses were geocoded, and correlated Area Deprivation Index (ADI) scores were classified into quintiles. Unhoused patients were classified as a separate category. Groups were then compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. The primary outcome was any infection. Resistant infections were analyzed as a secondary outcome. Results: Overall, 788 patients were included for analysis. The median ADI state decile was 6 (interquartile range = 5-8); 4.6% (n = 36) of patients were unhoused. 16.6% (n = 131) of patients had an infection during admission, whereas 6.3% (n = 50) had an infection with a resistant organism. Risk factors for having an infection included age (p < 0.001), percent total body surface area burned (p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (0.004). ADI quintile was not associated with infection. The unhoused state was an independent risk factor for resistant infection (odds ratio = 3.37, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-9.31, p = 0.027). Conclusions: ADI was not associated with an increased risk of infection, but unhoused patients are at increased risk of developing an infection with a resistant organism during admission for a burn injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical infections
Surgical infections INFECTIOUS DISEASES-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Infections provides comprehensive and authoritative information on the biology, prevention, and management of post-operative infections. Original articles cover the latest advancements, new therapeutic management strategies, and translational research that is being applied to improve clinical outcomes and successfully treat post-operative infections. Surgical Infections coverage includes: -Peritonitis and intra-abdominal infections- Surgical site infections- Pneumonia and other nosocomial infections- Cellular and humoral immunity- Biology of the host response- Organ dysfunction syndromes- Antibiotic use- Resistant and opportunistic pathogens- Epidemiology and prevention- The operating room environment- Diagnostic studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信