在聚类随机试验中检测治疗效果异质性的排列检验。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lara Maleyeff, Fan Li, Sebastien Haneuse, Rui Wang
{"title":"在聚类随机试验中检测治疗效果异质性的排列检验。","authors":"Lara Maleyeff, Fan Li, Sebastien Haneuse, Rui Wang","doi":"10.1177/09622802251348999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cluster randomized trials are widely used in healthcare research for the evaluation of intervention strategies. Beyond estimating the average treatment effect, it is often of interest to assess whether the treatment effect varies across subgroups. While conventional methods based on tests of interaction terms between treatment and covariates can be used to detect treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials, they typically rely on parametric assumptions that may not hold in practice. Adapting existing permutation tests from individually randomized trials, however, requires conceptual clarification and modification due to the multiple possible interpretations of treatment effect heterogeneity in the cluster randomized trial context. In this work, we develop variations of permutation tests and clarify key causal definitions in order to assess treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials. Our procedure enables investigators to simultaneously test for effect modification across a large number of covariates, while maintaining nominal type I error rates and reasonable power in simulation studies. In the Pain Program for Active Coping and Training (PPACT) study, the proposed methods are able to detect treatment effect heterogeneity that was not identified by conventional methods assessing treatment-covariate interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22038,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":"9622802251348999"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Permutation tests for detecting treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials.\",\"authors\":\"Lara Maleyeff, Fan Li, Sebastien Haneuse, Rui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09622802251348999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cluster randomized trials are widely used in healthcare research for the evaluation of intervention strategies. Beyond estimating the average treatment effect, it is often of interest to assess whether the treatment effect varies across subgroups. While conventional methods based on tests of interaction terms between treatment and covariates can be used to detect treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials, they typically rely on parametric assumptions that may not hold in practice. Adapting existing permutation tests from individually randomized trials, however, requires conceptual clarification and modification due to the multiple possible interpretations of treatment effect heterogeneity in the cluster randomized trial context. In this work, we develop variations of permutation tests and clarify key causal definitions in order to assess treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials. Our procedure enables investigators to simultaneously test for effect modification across a large number of covariates, while maintaining nominal type I error rates and reasonable power in simulation studies. In the Pain Program for Active Coping and Training (PPACT) study, the proposed methods are able to detect treatment effect heterogeneity that was not identified by conventional methods assessing treatment-covariate interactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Methods in Medical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9622802251348999\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Methods in Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802251348999\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802251348999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

聚类随机试验在医疗保健研究中被广泛用于评估干预策略。除了估计平均治疗效果之外,评估治疗效果在不同亚组之间是否存在差异也很有意义。虽然基于治疗和协变量之间相互作用项检验的传统方法可用于检测聚类随机试验中治疗效果的异质性,但它们通常依赖于在实践中可能不成立的参数假设。然而,从单个随机试验中调整现有的排列试验需要澄清概念和修改,因为在集群随机试验背景下对治疗效果异质性的多种可能解释。在这项工作中,我们开发了排列测试的变体,并澄清了关键的因果定义,以评估聚类随机试验中的治疗效果异质性。我们的程序使研究人员能够同时测试大量协变量的影响修改,同时在模拟研究中保持名义I型错误率和合理的功率。在积极应对和训练疼痛计划(PPACT)研究中,提出的方法能够检测治疗效果的异质性,这是传统方法评估治疗-协变量相互作用所不能识别的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Permutation tests for detecting treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials.

Cluster randomized trials are widely used in healthcare research for the evaluation of intervention strategies. Beyond estimating the average treatment effect, it is often of interest to assess whether the treatment effect varies across subgroups. While conventional methods based on tests of interaction terms between treatment and covariates can be used to detect treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials, they typically rely on parametric assumptions that may not hold in practice. Adapting existing permutation tests from individually randomized trials, however, requires conceptual clarification and modification due to the multiple possible interpretations of treatment effect heterogeneity in the cluster randomized trial context. In this work, we develop variations of permutation tests and clarify key causal definitions in order to assess treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials. Our procedure enables investigators to simultaneously test for effect modification across a large number of covariates, while maintaining nominal type I error rates and reasonable power in simulation studies. In the Pain Program for Active Coping and Training (PPACT) study, the proposed methods are able to detect treatment effect heterogeneity that was not identified by conventional methods assessing treatment-covariate interactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Statistical Methods in Medical Research 医学-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
127
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical Methods in Medical Research is a peer reviewed scholarly journal and is the leading vehicle for articles in all the main areas of medical statistics and an essential reference for all medical statisticians. This unique journal is devoted solely to statistics and medicine and aims to keep professionals abreast of the many powerful statistical techniques now available to the medical profession. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信