老年人内皮糖萼厚度的性别差异和对糖萼靶向治疗的反应。

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Colin J Gimblet, Anthony J Donato, Diana I Jalal, Gary L Pierce
{"title":"老年人内皮糖萼厚度的性别差异和对糖萼靶向治疗的反应。","authors":"Colin J Gimblet, Anthony J Donato, Diana I Jalal, Gary L Pierce","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endothelial glycocalyx thickness declines with age, potentially increasing cardiovascular disease risk. However, sex differences in glycocalyx thickness and responses to glycocalyx-targeted therapies remain unclear. This post hoc analysis examined sex differences in glycocalyx thickness and the effects of Endocalyx Pro supplementation in older adults. We analyzed data from 22 participants in a prior clinical trial (NCT06071728) that assessed 12-week Endocalyx Pro (3712 mg/day) supplementation on vascular function. Glycocalyx thickness was estimated as the perfused boundary region (PBR) using the GlycoCheck, with higher PBR indicating smaller glycocalyx thickness. Postmenopausal females had higher PBR 4-25 than older males (2.11 ± 0.14 vs. 1.97 ± 0.13 μm; p = 0.02), particularly in microvessels 9-17 μm in diameter. Male sex (B [95% CI], -0.14 [-0.26, -0.02]; p = 0.02) and body mass index (BMI) (B [95% CI], -0.02 [-0.04, -0.01]; p = 0.01) were associated with lower PBR 4-25 in univariate analyses; however, when included in a multivariate model, the association with sex was attenuated (p = 0.15), while BMI remained significant (p = 0.04). After 12 weeks of Endocalyx Pro, PBR 4-25 increased in older males (+0.087 ± 0.148 μm) but decreased in postmenopausal females (-0.178 ± 0.148 μm; p = 0.009). In conclusion, we observed that postmenopausal females had smaller glycocalyx thickness, partially explained by BMI, and demonstrated a greater improvement with Endocalyx Pro, suggesting sex-specific therapy effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 12","pages":"e70428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in endothelial glycocalyx thickness and the response to glycocalyx-targeted therapy among older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Colin J Gimblet, Anthony J Donato, Diana I Jalal, Gary L Pierce\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.70428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Endothelial glycocalyx thickness declines with age, potentially increasing cardiovascular disease risk. However, sex differences in glycocalyx thickness and responses to glycocalyx-targeted therapies remain unclear. This post hoc analysis examined sex differences in glycocalyx thickness and the effects of Endocalyx Pro supplementation in older adults. We analyzed data from 22 participants in a prior clinical trial (NCT06071728) that assessed 12-week Endocalyx Pro (3712 mg/day) supplementation on vascular function. Glycocalyx thickness was estimated as the perfused boundary region (PBR) using the GlycoCheck, with higher PBR indicating smaller glycocalyx thickness. Postmenopausal females had higher PBR 4-25 than older males (2.11 ± 0.14 vs. 1.97 ± 0.13 μm; p = 0.02), particularly in microvessels 9-17 μm in diameter. Male sex (B [95% CI], -0.14 [-0.26, -0.02]; p = 0.02) and body mass index (BMI) (B [95% CI], -0.02 [-0.04, -0.01]; p = 0.01) were associated with lower PBR 4-25 in univariate analyses; however, when included in a multivariate model, the association with sex was attenuated (p = 0.15), while BMI remained significant (p = 0.04). After 12 weeks of Endocalyx Pro, PBR 4-25 increased in older males (+0.087 ± 0.148 μm) but decreased in postmenopausal females (-0.178 ± 0.148 μm; p = 0.009). In conclusion, we observed that postmenopausal females had smaller glycocalyx thickness, partially explained by BMI, and demonstrated a greater improvement with Endocalyx Pro, suggesting sex-specific therapy effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"13 12\",\"pages\":\"e70428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内皮糖萼厚度随着年龄的增长而下降,可能增加心血管疾病的风险。然而,糖萼厚度的性别差异和对糖萼靶向治疗的反应尚不清楚。这个事后分析检查了糖萼厚度的性别差异和Endocalyx Pro补充对老年人的影响。我们分析了之前一项临床试验(NCT06071728)中22名参与者的数据,该试验评估了补充12周Endocalyx Pro (3712 mg/天)对血管功能的影响。糖萼厚度用糖检查法估计为灌注边界区(PBR), PBR越大说明糖萼厚度越小。绝经后女性的PBR 4-25高于老年男性(2.11±0.14∶1.97±0.13 μm;P = 0.02),特别是在直径9-17 μm的微血管中。男性(B [95% CI], -0.14 [-0.26, -0.02];p = 0.02)和身体质量指数(BMI) (B(95%置信区间),-0.02 (-0.04,-0.01);单因素分析中p = 0.01)与较低的PBR 4-25相关;然而,当纳入多变量模型时,与性别的关联减弱(p = 0.15),而BMI仍然显著(p = 0.04)。用药12周后,老年男性PBR 4-25升高(+0.087±0.148 μm),绝经后女性PBR 4-25降低(-0.178±0.148 μm);p = 0.009)。总之,我们观察到绝经后女性的糖萼厚度较小,部分由BMI解释,并且Endocalyx Pro显示出更大的改善,提示性别特异性治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex differences in endothelial glycocalyx thickness and the response to glycocalyx-targeted therapy among older adults.

Endothelial glycocalyx thickness declines with age, potentially increasing cardiovascular disease risk. However, sex differences in glycocalyx thickness and responses to glycocalyx-targeted therapies remain unclear. This post hoc analysis examined sex differences in glycocalyx thickness and the effects of Endocalyx Pro supplementation in older adults. We analyzed data from 22 participants in a prior clinical trial (NCT06071728) that assessed 12-week Endocalyx Pro (3712 mg/day) supplementation on vascular function. Glycocalyx thickness was estimated as the perfused boundary region (PBR) using the GlycoCheck, with higher PBR indicating smaller glycocalyx thickness. Postmenopausal females had higher PBR 4-25 than older males (2.11 ± 0.14 vs. 1.97 ± 0.13 μm; p = 0.02), particularly in microvessels 9-17 μm in diameter. Male sex (B [95% CI], -0.14 [-0.26, -0.02]; p = 0.02) and body mass index (BMI) (B [95% CI], -0.02 [-0.04, -0.01]; p = 0.01) were associated with lower PBR 4-25 in univariate analyses; however, when included in a multivariate model, the association with sex was attenuated (p = 0.15), while BMI remained significant (p = 0.04). After 12 weeks of Endocalyx Pro, PBR 4-25 increased in older males (+0.087 ± 0.148 μm) but decreased in postmenopausal females (-0.178 ± 0.148 μm; p = 0.009). In conclusion, we observed that postmenopausal females had smaller glycocalyx thickness, partially explained by BMI, and demonstrated a greater improvement with Endocalyx Pro, suggesting sex-specific therapy effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信